| Literature DB >> 32328081 |
Qien Li1,2, Xiao Guo2, Junfeng Niu1, Dongzhu Duojie3, Xianjia Li2, Lars Opgenoorth4,5, Jiabin Zou1,2.
Abstract
In response to past climatic changes, the species with different habits or adaptive traits likely have experienced very different evolutionary histories, especially for species that restricted to high mountain areas. In order to trace how Quaternary climatic oscillations affected range distributions and intraspecific divergence of such alpine plants on the Tibetan Plateau, here, we investigated maternally inherited chloroplast DNA (cpDNA) markers and biparentally inherited nuclear ribosomal internal transcribed spacer (ITS) DNA variations and aimed to explore the phylogeographic history of the endemic alpine species Corydalis hendersonii Hemsl. (Papaveraceae). We sequenced four cpDNA fragments (trnS-trnG, trnT-trnL, atpH-atpI, and psbE-petL) and also the nuclear (ITS) region in 368 individuals from 30 populations across the species' range. The network and phylogenetic analysis based on cpDNA variations identified 15 chlorotypes that cluster into three distinct clades. However, our nuclear DNA results demonstrated that there were four genetic/geographical groups within C. hendersonii. Some common and highly divergent cpDNA and ITS haplotypes were distributed in the populations of central and northeastern Tibetan Plateau, and the highest nucleotide diversity and genetic differentiation were detected in the central region. Demographic tests further indicated that the populations of southwestern and western Tibet may have experienced recent range expansion, which most likely occurred during the last glacial maximum (LGM) and continued its expansion after the beginning of the Holocene. These two different groups of this species may have derived from potential refugia that existed in the central and/or northeastern regions of Tibet during recent interglacial periods. In addition, our AMOVA analyses detected high genetic differentiation along with the whole sampling range. Also, distinct phylogeographic structures were detected among populations of C. hendersonii based on both of cpDNA and ITS variation. These findings shed new light on the importance of climatic oscillations during Quaternary and complex local topography as causes of intraspecific diversification and demographic changes within cold-tolerant herbs in the Tibetan Plateau biodiversity hotspot.Entities:
Keywords: Corydalis hendersonii Hemsl.; genetic variation; intraspecific diversification; phylogeography; quaternary climatic oscillations; refugium
Year: 2020 PMID: 32328081 PMCID: PMC7160248 DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2020.00436
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Plant Sci ISSN: 1664-462X Impact factor: 5.753
Sampling sites, sample size (N), chlorotypes distribution, estimates of haplotype diversity (H E), and nucleotide diversity (π) in 30 populations of C. hendersonii.
| Population code | Sample location | Latitude | Longitude | Altitude | Chlorotypes |
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (°N) | (°E) | (m) | ||||||
| Northeastern populations | ||||||||
| 1 | Chamdo | 31.56 | 97.67 | 4,704 | C1(12), C2(2), C3(1) | 0.362 | 0.15 | 15 |
| 2 | Dengqen | 31.21 | 95.60 | 4,830 | C4(10) | 0.000 | 0.00 | 10 |
| 3 | Sog | 31.88 | 94.49 | 4,925 | C3(2) | 0.000 | 0.00 | 2 |
| 4 | Biru | 31.48 | 93.68 | 4,800 | C3(17), C5(1) | 0.111 | 0.03 | 18 |
| 5 | Amdo | 32.87 | 91.93 | 5,623 | C9(11) | 0.000 | 0.00 | 11 |
| Average | 0.036 | |||||||
| Central populations | ||||||||
| 6 | Lhari | 30.75 | 93.09 | 5,335 | C3(10), C6(1), C7(1) | 0.318 | 0.24 | 12 |
| 7 | Sangri | 29.66 | 92.45 | 4,864 | C6(11) | 0.000 | 0.00 | 11 |
| 8 | Maldrogongkar | 29.83 | 92.35 | 4,927 | C3(2), C6(9), C8(1) | 0.439 | 0.22 | 12 |
| 9 | Maldrogongkar | 30.42 | 92.21 | 4,969 | C7(12) | 0.000 | 0.00 | 12 |
| 10 | Nagchu | 30.61 | 91.93 | 4,850 | C7(13) | 0.000 | 0.00 | 13 |
| 11 | Damxung | 30.69 | 91.11 | 5,050 | C7(11) | 0.000 | 0.00 | 11 |
| 12 | Lhunzhub | 30.12 | 91.27 | 4,785 | C3(17) | 0.000 | 0.00 | 17 |
| 13 | Lhasa | 29.75 | 91.21 | 4,912 | C11(15) | 0.000 | 0.00 | 15 |
| Average | 0.058 | |||||||
| Southwestern populations | ||||||||
| 14 | Zhanang | 28.97 | 91.32 | 5,135 | C3(16) | 0.000 | 0.00 | 16 |
| 15 | Comai | 28.80 | 91.77 | 4,961 | C3(13), C10(1) | 0.143 | 0.04 | 14 |
| 16 | Comai | 28.71 | 91.80 | 5,164 | C3(4), C6(5) | 0.556 | 0.34 | 9 |
| 17 | Comai | 28.35 | 91.77 | 5,213 | C3(16) | 0.000 | 0.00 | 16 |
| 18 | Gonggar | 28.99 | 91.09 | 5,128 | C3(8) | 0.000 | 0.00 | 8 |
| 19 | Rinbung | 29.17 | 90.23 | 5,266 | C3(8) | 0.000 | 0.00 | 8 |
| 20 | Gyangze | 28.89 | 90.19 | 5,224 | C3(8) | 0.000 | 0.00 | 8 |
| 21 | Nagarze | 28.63 | 91.19 | 5,422 | C3(8) | 0.000 | 0.00 | 8 |
| 22 | Namling | 29.63 | 89.47 | 5,326 | C3(10) | 0.000 | 0.00 | 10 |
| 23 | Shigatse | 29.46 | 89.04 | 4,884 | C3(12) | 0.000 | 0.00 | 12 |
| 24 | Xaitongmoin | 29.46 | 88.40 | 5,706 | C3(10) | 0.000 | 0.00 | 10 |
| 25 | Ngamring | 29.05 | 86.59 | 5,774 | C3(11) | 0.000 | 0.00 | 11 |
| 26 | Nyima | 32.75 | 87.65 | 5,396 | C3(22), C12(4), C13(1) | 0.325 | 0.10 | 27 |
| Average | 0.037 | |||||||
| Western populations | ||||||||
| 27 | Gerze | 31.77 | 84.94 | 5,580 | C3(10) | 0.000 | 0.00 | 10 |
| 28 | Gegyai | 32.38 | 82.32 | 5,947 | C3(11) | 0.000 | 0.00 | 11 |
| 29 | Burang | 31.03 | 81.29 | 5,543 | C3(12), C14(3) | 0.343 | 0.10 | 15 |
| 30 | Gar | 31.66 | 80.12 | 5,460 | C15(16) | 0.000 | 0.00 | 16 |
| Average | 0.025 | |||||||
| Total | 0.596 | 0.38 | 368 |
Figure 1(A) Bayesian consensus tree based on 15 chlorotypes (C1–C15) identified in C. hendersonii. Numbers next to nodes indicated posterior probabilities and bootstrap values (only the values >50% are shown) based on Bayesian and maximum-likelihood (ML) analysis respectively. (B) Network of 15 chlorotypes for C. hendersonii. Each circle means a single haplotype sized in proportion to its frequency. Different colors denote different haplotypes. (C) Geographic distribution of all 15 chlorotypes detected in C. hendersonii (see for population codes); (D) Geographic distribution of six haplotypes of clade 2 and clade 3 relative to all of clade 1.
Estimates of average gene diversity within populations (H s), total gene diversity (H T), between-population differentiation (G ST), and number of substitution types (N ST) overall populations and within four different population groups.
| Population groups | cpDNA | ITS | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
| Northeastern populations (1–5) | 0.095 | 0.811 | 0.883 | 0.932 | 0.525 | 0.726 | 0.277 | 0.242 | |
| Central populations (6–13) | 0.095 | 0.893 | 0.894 | 0.899 | 0.829* | 0.959* | 0.136* | 0.212 (NC) | |
| Southwestern populations (14–26) | 0.079 | 0.123 | 0.390 (NC) | 0.419 (NC) | 0.725* | 0.802 | 0.096* | 0.109 | |
| Western populations (27–30) | 0.086 | 0.567 | 0.849 | 0.857 | 0.793* | 0.895 | 0.114* | 0.324 | |
| All populations | 0.087 | 0.594 | 0.854 | 0.894* | 0.729* | 0.933* | 0.219* | 0.359* | |
Population numbers are shown in the parentheses. *P < 0.05; NC, not calculated.
Analyses of molecular variance (AMOVA) based on cpDNA and ITS dataset from C. hendersonii.
| Grouping | Source of variation | cpDNA | ITS | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PV (%) | Fixation index | PV (%) | Fixation index | ||
| Total populations | Among populations | 87.70 |
| 28.30 |
|
| Within populations | 12.30 | 71.70 | |||
| SAMOVA groups | Among groups | 76.76 |
| 36.93 |
|
| Among populations | 15.23 |
| 5.60 |
| |
| Within populations | 8.01 |
| 57.47 |
| |
PV, percentage of variation; * represent P < 0.0001, 1000 permutations; FCT, correlation of haplotypes within groups relative to total; FSC, correlation within populations relative to groups; FST, correlation within populations relative to total.
Pairwise comparisons of F ST within and between four different population regions of C. hendersonii based on cpDNA and ITS dataset.
| Regions | cpDNA | ITS | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Northeast | Center | Southwest | West | Northeast | Center | Southwest | West | ||
| Northeast | 0.1487* | 0.1039* | |||||||
| Center | 0.2969* | 0.1890* | 0.4655* | 0.1813* | |||||
| Southwest | 0.3129* | 0.4654* | 0.0598* | 0.4652* | 0.3029* | 0.1996* | |||
| West | 0.2222* | 0.3985* | 0.2305* | 0.0990* | 0.2766* | 0.3518* | 0.2848* | 0.2199* | |
*Represent P < 0.0001.
Figure 2(A) Network of 49 ITS haplotypes for C. hendersonii. Each circle means a single haplotype sized in proportion to its frequency. Different colors denote different haplotypes. (B) Geographic distribution of all 49 ITS haplotypes detected in C. hendersonii (see for population codes).
Figure 3Bayesian clustering results of the structure analysis for ITS sequence data of 368 individuals (30 populations) of C. hendersonii form the Tibetan Plateau. (A) Histogram of the structure analysis for the model with K = 3; (B) Geographic origin of the 30 C. hendersonii populations and their color-coded grouping according to the structure analysis for the model with K = 3. NE, northeastern Tibet; C, central Tibet; SW, southwestern Tibet; W, western Tibet.
Figure 4(A) Distribution of the number of pairwise nucleotide differences for cpDNA sequence data in all populations and in each genetic group of C. hendersonii. The solid line shows observed distributions of differences among chlorotypes, whereas the dashed line represents simulated distributions under a model of sudden (stepwise) demographic population expansion. (B) Extended Bayesian skyline plots (EBSP) for effective populations sizes (assuming generation time of 5 years) in all populations and in each genetic group of C. hendersonii. Dotted lines are the median values and the gray areas represent the boundary of the 95% central posterior density (CPD) intervals.
Estimates of neutrality tests and mismatch distribution analysis for pooled populations of C. hendersonii based on cpDNA sequence data.
| Regions | Parameter ( |
|
|
|
| Fu's | Tajima's |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Northeast | 0.014 (0.000–5.549) | NC | NC | 0.041 | 0.079 | 2.759 | 1.573 |
| Center | 3.191 (0.000–46.691) | NC | NC | 0.018 | 0.069 | 2.416 | 1.973 |
| Southwest | 3.000 (0.000–3.500) | 14.890 (0.000–217.871) | 122.693 (0.000–1,795.255) | 0.005 | 0.653 | −3.166** | −1.273* |
| West | 0.703 (0.004–1.232) | 3.280 (0.019–5.749) | 27.030 (0.154–47.370) | 0.023 | 0.192 | −0.585* | −1.281* |
| Overall | 0.000 (0.000–0.438) | NC | NC | 0.443 | 0.065 | −3.906 | −0.602 |
SSD, sum of squared deviations; HRag, Harpending's raggedness index; τ, time in number of generations elapsed since the sudden expansion episode; t, expansion time; Upper and lower 95% confidence limits around estimates of τ and associated ranges of t are in parentheses; NC, not calculated. **P < 0.05; *P < 0.1.
Figure 5Potential distributions as probability of occurrence for C. hendersonii on the Tibetan Plateau. (A) At the Last Inter-Glacial (LIG; ~ 120 000–140 000 years before present); (B) At the Last Glacial Maximum (LGM; ~ 21 000 years before present); (C) Under current conditions (1950–2000).