| Literature DB >> 34721994 |
Lu Gong1,2,3, Danchun Zhang1,2, Xiaoxia Ding1, Juan Huang1,2,3, Wan Guan1, Xiaohui Qiu1,2,3, Zhihai Huang1,2,3.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Amomum villosum Lour. is the plant that produces the famous traditional Chinese medicine Amomi Fructus. Frequent habitat destruction seriously threatens A. villosum germplasm resources. Genetic diversity is very important to the optimization of germplasm resources and population protection, but the range of inherited traits within A. villosum is unclear. In this study, we analyzed the genetic diversity and genetic structures of A. villosum populations in Guangdong and constructed a local reference DNA barcode library as a resource for conservation efforts.Entities:
Keywords: Amomum villosum; DNA barcode; Genetic diversity; Genetic structure; ISSR
Year: 2021 PMID: 34721994 PMCID: PMC8541303 DOI: 10.7717/peerj.12325
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PeerJ ISSN: 2167-8359 Impact factor: 2.984
Sampling information of A. villosum populations in Guangdong Province.
| No. | Pop. | Serial No. | Longitude /N | Latitude /E | Samples size |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ZhongjiaoDong | ZJD | 112°04′01″ | 22°24′16″ | 33 |
| 2 | Tankui Village | TK | 112°04′30″ | 22°24′22″ | 16 |
| 3 | G325 National Roadside | ZY | 112°03′59″ | 22°24′26″ | 25 |
| 4 | XingfuVillage | XFC | 112°00′41″ | 22°21′54″ | 18 |
| 5 | National Geopark | GY | 111°49′51″ | 22°35′19″ | 19 |
| 6 | Dianbai District, Maoming | MM | 111°12′21″ | 21°45′52″ | 10 |
| 7 | Datong Village | YC | 111°58′48″ | 22°23′25″ | 20 |
Figure 1Geographical distribution of collected A. villosum populations.
Populations in the small red box are enlarged in the large red box.
Efficiency of PCR and sequence characterization of DNA barcodes.
| Numbers of sequences | PCR amplification success rate (%) | Sequencing success rate (%) | Average sequence length (bp) | GC content (%) | Conservative sites | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ITS2 | 134 | 95.74 | 95.04 | 229 | 59.83 | 229 |
|
| 76 | 57.45 | 53.90 | 667 | 28.49 | 667 |
| ITS | 139 | 99.29 | 98.58 | 653 | 56.20 | 653 |
|
| 41 | 29.08 | 29.08 | 787 | 29.22 | 787 |
|
| 141 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 729 | 41.84 | 729 |
ISSR banding patterns of seven A. villosum populations.
| Primers | Sequences | Tm(°C) | Amplification bands | Polymorphic bands | PPB(%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UBC808 | (AG)8C | 52.00 | 11 | 11 | 100.00 |
| UBC817 | (CA)8A | 49.24 | 11 | 10 | 90.91 |
| UBC825 | (AC)8T | 52.00 | 12 | 12 | 100.00 |
| UBC840 | (GA)8YT | 52.74 | 12 | 10 | 83.33 |
| UBC866 | (CTC)6 | 56.60 | 6 | 4 | 66.67 |
| UBC889 | DBD-(AC)7 | 46.83 | 14 | 9 | 64.29 |
| sum | — | — | 66 | 56 | 84.85 |
| mean | — | — | 11 | 9.33 | 84.82 |
Genetic diversity of A. villosum populations based on ISSR.
| NO. | Na | Ne | H | I | PPB(%) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ZJD | 9 | 1.5303 | 1.3492 | 0.1998 | 0.2954 | 53.03 |
| TK | 4 | 1.2879 | 1.1848 | 0.1117 | 0.1658 | 28.79 |
| ZY | 7 | 1.7121 | 1.4240 | 0.2536 | 0.3816 | 71.21 |
| XFC | 5 | 1.4394 | 1.2685 | 0.1624 | 0.2434 | 43.94 |
| GY | 5 | 1.4848 | 1.3516 | 0.1998 | 0.2897 | 48.48 |
| MM | 3 | 1.4901 | 1.3273 | 0.1818 | 0.2604 | 40.91 |
| YC | 5 | 1.4394 | 1.2753 | 0.1648 | 0.2460 | 43.94 |
| mean | 7 | 1.4834 | 1.3115 | 0.1820 | 0.2689 | 47.19 |
| At species level | 38 | 1.9394 | 1.5662 | 0.3281 | 0.4895 |
Notes.
number of alleles
effective number of alleles
Nei’s gene diversity index
Shannon’s polymorphism information index
percentage of polymorphic sites
Figure 2DNA barcode sequences of A. villosum.
(A) ITS2, (B) psbA-trnH, (C) ITS, (D) matK, (E) rbcL.
Genetic structure of A. villosum populations based on ISSR.
| Samples size | Genetic diversity of the total populations (Ht) | Genetic diversity within populations (Hs) | Gene differentiation coefficient (Gst) | Gene flow (Nm) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 38 | 0.3299 | 0.1819 | 0.4487 | 0.6143 |
| Standard deviation | ±0.0272 | ±0.0102 | — | — |
AMOVA analysis of A. villosum populations based on ISSR.
| Source of variation | Degree of freedom /df | Mean square deviation /SS | Mean square value /MS | Variance component | Variance component percentage (%) |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Among populations | 6 | 167.835 | 27.972 | 3.718 | 31.26 | 0.001 |
| Within populations | 37 | 253.455 | 8.176 | 8.176 | 68.74 | 0.001 |
| Sum | 43 | 421.289 | — | 11.894 | 100 | — |
Nei’s genetic distance of A. villosum populations.
| ZJD | TK | ZY | XFC | GY | MM | YC | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ZJD | 0.0000 | ||||||
| TK | 0.0844 | 0.0000 | |||||
| ZY | 0.0973 | 0.1247 | 0.0000 | ||||
| XFC | 0.2347 | 0.3317 | 0.1957 | 0.0000 | |||
| GY | 0.2260 | 0.2697 | 0.1946 | 0.1463 | 0.0000 | ||
| MM | 0.2785 | 0.2827 | 0.2218 | 0.2342 | 0.1132 | 0.0000 | |
| YC | 0.2697 | 0.2719 | 0.2176 | 0.3347 | 0.2003 | 0.1382 | 0.0000 |
Figure 3Correlation of geographic distance and genetic distance.
Figure 4UPGMA clustering map of A. villosum populaitons.
Figure 5PCoA map of A. villosum populations (coord. 1 = 48.04% and coord. 2 = 26.74%).