| Literature DB >> 32326892 |
Bo Wang1,2, Xiaofei Liang3, Mark L Gleason4, Tom Hsiang5, Rong Zhang1, Guangyu Sun6.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The wide variation in the size of fungal genomes is well known, but the reasons for this size variation are less certain. Here, we present a chromosome-scale assembly of ectophytic Peltaster fructicola, a surface-dwelling extremophile, based on long-read DNA sequencing technology, to assess possible mechanisms associated with genome compaction.Entities:
Keywords: Compact genome; Ectophytic; Extreme environment fungi; Genome architecture; Oxford Nanopore sequencing; Retroelement
Year: 2020 PMID: 32326892 PMCID: PMC7181583 DOI: 10.1186/s12864-020-6732-8
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Genomics ISSN: 1471-2164 Impact factor: 3.969
Fig. 1Chromosome level assembly of P. fructicola genome and syntenic blocks of the five chromosomes. a. Dot plot illustrating the comparative analysis of the chromosome level assembly genome and previous draft genome [12]. Scaffolds were grouped into chromosomes. The blue circles highlight major linker regions in chromosome level genome version. b. Circos plot displaying five collinearity blocks among five chromosomes of P. fructicola. From outside to inside, it represents the distribution of chromosome display, GC contents and syntenic regions, respectively
Fig. 2Phylogeny and genome characteristics of Peltaster fructicola and other 16 studied Dothideomycetes species. a. A maximum likelihood phylogenetic tree constructed from concatenated alignment of 1957 single-copy orthologs conserved across all species. Bootstrap values are indicated on branches. Ustilago maydis with small genome was used as the outgroup. b. Genome size compared among selected species. c. Median length of introns compared among selected species. d. Intergenic length ratio (%) compared among selected species
Fig. 3Comparison of gene density and genome sizes in selected species
Fig. 4Length of intergenic region, colinearity, transposable elements (TEs) and gene density analysis between Peltaster fructicola and Zymoseptoria tritici. a. Intergenic length density plot of P. fructicola genome and Z. tritici genome. b. Syntenic blocks between two species are shown in various color lines (BLASTN coverage > 1 kb). P. fructicola (PF) chromosomes are shown as light blue colour, Z. tritici (ZT) 21 chromosomes [22] are shown as colour. Track a-c are the distribution of chromosomes, TEs density and gene density respectively, with densities calculated in 100 kb windows
Peltaster fructicola nuclear genome statistics and comparison to other fungal species with highly compact genome
| Species | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chromosomes (count) | 5 | NAa | NAa | 16 |
| Genome size (Mb) | 18.99 | 13.3 | 8.1 | 12.07 |
| GC content (%) | 51.95 | 49.5 | 29.1 | 38.3 |
| Protein coding genes (count) | 8072 | 5735 | 3898 | 6002 |
| Exons per gene (count) | 2.32 | 2.1 | 3.7 | 1.13 |
| Introns per gene (count) | 1.36 | NAa | 4.7b | 0.06 |
| tRNA genes (count) | 44 | 169 | 71 | 275 |
| rDNA copies (count) | 9 | 1 | 5 | ~ 560b |
| Intergenic distance (median, bp) | 463 | NAa | 326 | 350 |
| Intergenic regions (%) | 31 | 36 | 29 | 26 |
| Intron distance (median, bp) | 50 | NAa | 45 | 111 |
| Telomere repeat unit | TAGGG | TTAGGG | TTAGGG | T(G)2–3(TG)1–6 |
| Repeat content (%) | 0.34 | 1.5 | 9.8 | 5.13 |
| Data source | Current study | From reference [ | From reference [ | Analysis in this study. NCBI R64 genome version was used |
aNA, not applicable or not available from the website
bThese data are obtained from reference [9]
Classified repeat contents in Peltaster fructicola, Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Zymoseptoria tritici. All annotation data were analysis using the pipeline described in method section
| Current study | NCBI R64 | NCBI IPO323 | |
| 5 | 4 | 537 | |
| Penelope | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Tad1 | 5 | 3 | 376 |
| RTE/Bov-B | 0 | 0 | 97 |
| L1/CIN4 | 0 | 0 | 63 |
| CRE | 0 | 1 | 0 |
| 92 | 558 | 1376 | |
| BEL/Pao | 0 | 0 | 37 |
| Ty1/Copia | 34 | 477 | 347 |
| Gypsy/DIRS1 | 57 | 81 | 991 |
| Ngaro | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Retroposon (Unclassified) | 1 | 0 | 348 |
| hobo-Activator | 3 | 0 | 85 |
| hAT-hATw | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| hAT-Ac | 2 | 0 | 1 |
| hAT-Restless | 0 | 0 | 84 |
| Helitron | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| TcMar-Sagan | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| TcMar-Pogo | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| TcMar-Fot1 | 2 | 1 | 88 |
| TcMar-Tc1 | 0 | 0 | 40 |
| TcMar-Ant1 | 0 | 1 | 63 |
| Novosib | 0 | 0 | 30 |
| Dada | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| En-Spm | 1 | 7 | 2 |
| DNA (Unclassified) | 1 | 4 | 44 |
| MuLE-MuDR | 0 | 0 | 63 |
| Tourist/Harbinger | 4 | 3 | 61 |
| Other (Mirage, P-element, Transib) | 1 | 1 | 0 |
| Simple repeats: | 1279 | 2828 | 6392 |
| Low complexity: | 78 | 530 | 830 |
Fig. 5Transposons length analysis of P. fructicola (PF) compared with S. cerevisiae (SC) and Z. tritici (ZT). a. Boxplots of proportion of total TE length. b. Number of full-length transposons are shown (> 90% length over family consensus)