| Literature DB >> 32326266 |
Daniela G Arakaki1,2, Vanessa Samúdio Dos Santos3, Elaine Pádua de Melo1,2, Hugo Pereira1,2, Priscila Silva Figueiredo1, Mário Rodrigues Cortês4, Carlos Alexandre Carollo3, Lincoln Carlos Silva de Oliveira4, Paula Tschinkel1,2, Francisco Reis1,2, Igor Souza1,2, Rafaela Rosa1,2, Fabiane Sanches5, Elisvânia Freitas Dos Santos1, Valter Aragão do Nascimento1,2.
Abstract
Fruits and byproducts are valuable sources of nutrients and bioactive compounds, which are associated with a decreased risk of developing several diseases, such as cancer, inflammation, cardiovascular diseases, and Alzheimer's. The fruits of canjiqueira (Byrsonima cydoniifolia) are already exploited as a food resource, while the seeds are discarded. This study aimed at showing the potential of the whole fruit of canjiqueira. Elemental characterization was performed on ICP OES, while thermal stability was assessed on thermogravimetry. The determination of the fatty acid profile was carried out on gas chromatography and bioactive compound identification using liquid chromatography and mass spectrometry. Results show that both parts of canjiqueira fruit are a source of various minerals, such as Ca, Cu, Fe, K, Mg, and Mn while the seed only is a good source for Zn. Oleic and linoleic acids are the main compounds in pulp and seed. The thermal stability of seed oil is superior to pulp oil, while piceatannol concentration is higher in seed than pulp. All parts of canjiqueira fruit may be used as a strategy to address nutrition issues and are valuable ingredients to prospective food products.Entities:
Keywords: byproducts; elemental content; fatty acid profile; secondary metabolites; thermal stability
Year: 2020 PMID: 32326266 PMCID: PMC7231018 DOI: 10.3390/foods9040521
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Foods ISSN: 2304-8158
Parameters of calibration curves obtained by external calibration, correlation coefficient (R2), the limit of detection (LOD) and limit of quantification (LOQ) by using ICP OES.
| Analyte | R2 | Equation External Calibration | LOD mg/kg | LOQ mg/kg |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Al | 0.9996 | y = 457.76x + 8.7836 | 0.056 | 0.187 |
| Ca | 0.9993 | y = 70225x + 1953.4 | 0.003 | 0.011 |
| Co | 0.9998 | y = 4161.7x + 5.8914 | 0.003 | 0.008 |
| Cu | 0.9997 | y = 13021x + 107.6 | 0.003 | 0.010 |
| Fe | 0.9996 | y = 3451.9x + 31.784 | 0.007 | 0.022 |
| K | 0.9969 | y = 290.72x + 18.667 | 0.345 | 1.149 |
| Mg | 0.9997 | y =284979x + 3438.5 | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Mo | 0.9998 | y = 2201.2x + 4.468 | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Mn | 0.9999 | y = 37724x + 281.01 | 0.0004 | 0.001 |
| Na | 0.9995 | y = 1167.7x + 7.7392 | 0.086 | 0.287 |
| Se | 0.9999 | y = 365.94x + 1.7592 | 0.011 | 0.037 |
| Zn | 0.9999 | y = 8849.5x + 74.424 | 0.0005 | 0.002 |
Calibration equations (y = ax + I), y = intensity; a = slope; x = concentration (mg/kg); I = intercept.
Addition and recovery tests to verify method precision for all analytes obtained in ICP-OES (n = 3).
| Analyte | Accuracy | Precision | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Expected Value mg/L | Obtained Value mg/L | % Recovery | % RSD | |
| Al | 1.00 | 1.09 ± 0.003 | 109.17 | 0.27 |
| Ca | 1.00 | 0.89 ± 0.139 | 88.98 | 15.61 |
| Co | 1.00 | 0.95 ± 0.000 | 94.75 | 0.00 |
| Cu | 1.00 | 1.08 ± 0.003 | 108.28 | 0.27 |
| Fe | 1.00 | 1.11 ± 0.001 | 110.98 | 0.09 |
| K | 1.00 | 1.18 ± 0.390 | 118.50 | 33.05 |
| Mg | 1.00 | 0.90 ± 0.069 | 90.13 | 7.66 |
| Mo | 1.00 | 1.01 ± 0.001 | 101.29 | 0.10 |
| Mn | 1.00 | 0.94 ± 0.016 | 94.04 | 1.70 |
| Na | 1.00 | 1.09 ± 0.036 | 109.54 | 3.30 |
| Se | 1.00 | 0.90 ± 0.002 | 89.79 | 0.22 |
| Zn | 1.00 | 0.93 ± 0.001 | 92.94 | 0.10 |
Results expressed as average ± SD.
Mineral content in pulp and seed of canjiqueira mg/100 g (dry weight).
| Canjiqueira mg/100 g | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Element | Pulp | % Regarding DRIs | Seed | % Regarding DRIs | DRI (RDA/AI *) |
|
| Al | <LOD | NA | <LOD | NA | NA | NA |
| Ca | 295.56 ± 3.92 | 24.63–29.56 | 381.36 ± 3.92 | 31.78–38.14 | 1000–1200 | 0.6667 † |
| Co | <LOD | NA | <LOD | NA | NA | NA |
| Cu | 0.30 ± 0.02 | 33.33 | 0.78 ± 0.05 | 86.66 | 0.9 | 0.0057 |
| Fe | 1.89 ± 0.09 | 10.50–23.63 | 4.24 ± 0.79 | 23.56–53 | 8–18 | 0.0527 |
| K * | 1507.15 ± 100.70 | 44.33–57.97 | 891.16 ± 128.67 | 26.21–34.28 | 2600–3400 * | 0.0334 |
| Mg | 143.24 ± 0.40 | 34.10–46.21 | 151.90 ± 32.44 | 36.17–49 | 310–420 | >0.9999 † |
| Mo | <LOD | NA | <LOD | NA | NA | NA |
| Mn | 0.63 ± 0.04 | 27.39–35.00 | 0.90 ± 0.09 | 39.13–50 | 1.8–2.3 | 0.0575 |
| Na * | 1.08 ± 0.13 | 0.07 | 0.74 ± 0.19 | 0.05 | 1500 * | 0.3333 † |
| Se | 0.16 ± 0.03 | NA | 0.18 ± 0.01 | NA | NA | 0.3349 |
| Zn | 0.48 ± 0.04 | 4.36–6 | 1.28 ± 0.31 | 11.64–16 | 8–11 | 0.3333 † |
LOD—elemental contents were below the limits of detection. NA—not applicable (no DRI available or amount detected not significant for DRI). * p values determined by the Student t-test represent a difference between pulp and seed means when lower than <0.05. † Mann–Whitney test.
Fatty acid distribution (%) in pulp and seed of B. cydoniifolia.
| Fatty Acid | Pulp | Seed |
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||
| C10:0 –Capric acid | 0.2 ± 0.02 | 0.1 ± 0.01 | 0.0015 |
| C12:0 –Lauric acid | 0.4 ± 0.03 | 0.3 ± 0.02 | 0.0086 |
| C14:0 –Miristic acid | 0.6 ± 0.02 | 0.4 ± 0.02 | 0.0001 |
| C16:0 –Palmitic acid | 30.8 ± 0.31 | 18.2 ± 0.34 | <0.0001 |
| C18:0 –Estearic acid | 4.2 ± 0.04 | 4.9 ± 0.10 | 0.0004 |
| C20:0 –Araquidonic acid | 0.8 ± 0.03 | 0.5 ± 0.04 | 0.0005 |
| C22:0 –Behenic acid | 0.2 ± 0.01 | 0.1 ± 0.02 | 0.0015 |
| Total (%) | 37.1 | 24.5 | |
|
| |||
| C16:1 –Palmitoleic acid | 1.4 ± 0.06 | 0.65 ± 0.02 | <0.0001 |
| C18:1 –Oleic acid | 47.6 ± 0.35 | 39.3 ± 0.30 | <0.0001 |
| C20:1 - Cis-11-Eicosenoic acid | 0.2 ± 0.01 | 0.3 ± 0.01 | 0.0003 |
| Total (%) | 49.2 | 40.3 | |
|
| |||
| C18:2 –Linoleic acid | 8.5 ± 0.00 | 31.7 ± 0.11 | <0.0001 |
| C18:3n3 –Linolenic acid | 0.5 ± 0.01 | 0.2 ± 0.01 | <0.0001 |
| Total (%) | 9.0 | 31.9 |
Results expressed as average ± SD. * p values determined by the Student t-test represent a difference between pulp and seed when lower than <0.05.
Figure 1Thermal stability canjiqueira pulp and seed oils.
Figure 2Thermal decomposition of canjiqueira pulp oil.
Figure 3Thermal decomposition of canjiqueira seed oil.
Figure 4Chromatography profile of Byrsonima cydoniifolia seed and pulp extracts.