| Literature DB >> 30147227 |
Mariola Kozłowska1, Eliza Gruczyńska1.
Abstract
The present study was conducted to determine and compare the oxidative stability of soybean and sunflower oils using differential scanning calorimetry (DSC). These edible oils were enriched with marjoram (Origanum majorana L.), thyme (Thymus vulgaris L.), and oregano (Origanum vulgare L.) extracts at three different concentrations and synthetic antioxidant (BHA). The fatty acid composition of studied oils was determined by gas chromatography mass spectrometry to evaluate the content of unsaturated fatty acids that are sensitive to oxidation process. Oil samples were heated in the DSC at different heating rates (4.0, 7.5, 10.0, 12.5, and 15.0 °C min-1) and oxidation kinetic parameters (activation energy, pre-exponential factor, and oxidation rate constant) were calculated. The results showed that the oxidative stability of sunflower oil samples enriched with oregano extracts and soybean oil supplemented with thyme extracts was improved compared to samples without the addition of herbal plant extracts and the synthetic antioxidant.Entities:
Keywords: Differential scanning calorimetry; Herbal plant extracts; Oxidative stability; Soybean oil; Sunflower oil
Year: 2018 PMID: 30147227 PMCID: PMC6096694 DOI: 10.1007/s11696-018-0516-5
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Chem Zvesti ISSN: 0366-6352 Impact factor: 2.097
Parameters of sunflower (SFO) and soybean (SBO) oil samples
| Parameter | SFO | SBO |
|---|---|---|
| Acid value (AV/mg KOH g−1) | 0.07 ± 0.01a | 0.35 ± 0.01b |
| Peroxide value (PV/mmol O2 kg−1) | 1.98 ± 0.12a | 2.50 ± 0.09b |
| Fatty acids/% | ||
| Myristic (C14:0) | 0.1 ± 0.0a | 0.1 ± 0.0a |
| Palmitic (C16:0) | 6.7 ± 0.2a | 11.1 ± 0.3b |
| Oleopalmitic (C16:1) | 0.1 ± 0.0a | 0.1 ± 0.0a |
| Stearic (C18:0) | 3.9 ± 0.2a | 4.1 ± 0.2a |
| Oleic (C18:1) | 27.7 ± 0.4b | 25.4 ± 0.5a |
| Linoleic (C18:2) | 60.2 ± 0.7b | 53.1 ± 0.6a |
| Linolenic (C18:3) | 0.5 ± 0.1a | 5.0 ± 0.2b |
| Arachidic (C20:0) | 0.0 ± 0.0a | 0.2 ± 0.0a |
| Gadoleic (C20:1) | 0.2 ± 0.0a | 0.4 ± 0.1b |
| Dihomo-γ-linolenic (C20:3) | 0.6 ± 0.2a | 0.5 ± 0.1a |
| ∑ SFA/% | 10.7 ± 0.4a | 15.5 ± 0.6b |
| ∑ MUFA/% | 28.0 ± 0.6b | 25.9 ± 0.7a |
| ∑ PUFA/% | 61.3 ± 0.8b | 58.6 ± 0.7a |
Data represent mean ± SD (standard deviation) (n = 3). Values marked by the different lower case superscript letters within a row denote statistically significant differences (P < 0.05)
SFA sum of saturated fatty acids, MUFA sum of monounsaturated fatty acids, PUFA sum of polyunsaturated fatty acids
Fig. 1Example of DSC scan of non-isothermal oxidation of sunflower oil (SFO) and SFO samples containing BHA (0.01%), MARJORAM (0.07%), THYME (0.07%), OREGANO (0.07%), and THYME (0.005%) + BHA (0.005%) at heating rate β = 4 °C min−1
Extrapolated DSC thermoxidation onset temperatures (tON/°C) measured at different heating rates (β) for SFO oil samples
| Heating rate | SFO | BHA | MARJORAM | THYME | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0.01% | 0.01% | 0.03% | 0.07% | 0.01% | 0.03% | 0.07% | ||
| 4.0 | 145.86 ± 0.47a | 157.71 ± 0.56cd | 152.04 ± 0.54b | 156.17 ± 0.57c | 156.22 ± 0.57c | 152.82 ± 0.61b | 156.68 ± 0.62c | 156.86 ± 0.84cd |
| 7.5 | 159.37 ± 0.52a | 164.53 ± 1.00bc | 159.47 ± 0.97a | 161.90 ± 1.08a | 167.97 ± 1.12c | 162.84 ± 0.87ab | 166.17 ± 0.89c | 166.93 ± 0.90c |
| 10.0 | 167.84 ± 0,78a | 170.01 ± 0.60ab | 168.74 ± 0.59a | 170.42 ± 0.91ab | 172.30 ± 0.92b | 166.76 ± 1.13a | 168.02 ± 1.14a | 168.94 ± 1.15a |
| 12.5 | 171.98 ± 0.56a | 175.58 ± 0.57ab | 172.09 ± 0.56a | 172.42 ± 0.71a | 174.93 ± 0.72ab | 172.45 ± 1.44a | 174.37 ± 1.45ab | 175.34 ± 1.46ab |
| 15.0 | 176.08 ± 1.17a | 179.01 ± 1.24a | 176.10 ± 1.22a | 177.64 ± 1.23a | 178.14 ± 1.23a | 176.52 ± 1.22a | 177.11 ± 1.48a | 177.55 ± 1.48a |
The results are mean ± standard deviation. Values marked by the different lower case superscript letters (a–d) within a row denote statistically significant differences (P < 0.05)
Extrapolated DSC thermoxidation onset temperatures (tON/ °C) measured at different heating rates (β) for SBO oil samples
| Heating rate | SBO | BHA | MARJORAM | THYME | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0.01% | 0.01% | 0.03% | 0.07% | 0.01% | 0.03% | 0.07% | ||
| 4.0 | 157.05 ± 0.58a | 160.37 ± 0.82bc | 158.07 ± 0.74a | 161.37 ± 0.50c | 162.15 ± 0.57c | 161.67 ± 0.50c | 162.18 ± 0.78c | 162.52 ± 0.78c |
| 7.5 | 164.21 ± 0.67a | 167.31 ± 0.92ab | 166.27 ± 0.94ab | 171.67 ± 1.04c | 172.06 ± 1.12c | 169.16 ± 0.74bc | 169.33 ± 0.74bc | 171.72 ± 0.75c |
| 10.0 | 170.62 ± 0.79a | 175.26 ± 0.57b | 173.06 ± 0.63a | 174.96 ± 0.64b | 176.72 ± 0.92b | 172.78 ± 0.93a | 173.07 ± 1.08a | 176.36 ± 0.97b |
| 12.5 | 175.89 ± 0.59a | 179.53 ± 1.37b | 178.26 ± 1.26ab | 179.44 ± 1.22b | 180.37 ± 0.72b | 178.76 ± 0.91b | 179.46 ± 0.94b | 179.70 ± 0.94b |
| 15.0 | 180.06 ± 1.17a | 182.35 ± 1.44ab | 180.36 ± 1.28a | 182.59 ± 1.29ab | 183.08 ± 1.23ab | 181.59 ± 1.21ab | 181.64 ± 1.26ab | 182.13 ± 1.26ab |
The results are mean ± standard deviation. Values marked by the different lower case superscript letters within a row denote statistically significant differences (P < 0.05)
Regression analysis of DSC data (a, b, r2), activation energies (Ea, kJ mol−1), pre-exponential factors (Z, min−1), rate constants (k, min−1) and induction times (τ, min) for SFO samples
| Parameters | SFO | BHA | MARJORAM | THYME | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0.01% | 0.01% | 0.03% | 0.07% | 0.01% | 0.03% | 0.07% | ||
|
| − 3.562 | − 5.153 | − 4.407 | − 5.051 | − 5.117 | − 4.725 | − 5.446 | − 5.347 |
|
| 9.09 | 12.53 | 10.99 | 12.41 | 12.49 | 11.70 | 13.28 | 13.04 |
|
| 0.997 | 0.984 | 0.987 | 0.973 | 0.981 | 0.989 | 0.971 | 0.974 |
|
| 64.86 | 93.82 | 80.24 | 91.97 | 93.17 | 86.03 | 99.16 | 97.36 |
| log | 7.52 | 10.85 | 9.32 | 10.68 | 10.76 | 10.00 | 11.52 | 11.28 |
| 0.494 | 0.346 | 0.440 | 0.384 | 0.337 | 0.422 | 0.362 | 0.348 | |
| 2.024 | 2.890 | 2.272 | 2.604 | 2.967 | 2.369 | 2.762 | 2.873 | |
Parameters a, b, and r2 were obtained from plotting logβ vs. TON−1 for all samples
Regression analysis of DSC data (a, b, r), activation energies (Ea, kJ mol−1), pre-exponential factors (Z, min−1), rate constants (k, min−1), and induction times (τ, min) for SBO samples
| Parameters | SBO | BHA | MARJORAM | THYME | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0.01% | 0.01% | 0.03% | 0.07% | 0.01% | 0.03% | 0.07% | ||
|
| − 4.800 | − 4.941 | − 4.859 | − 5.455 | − 5.475 | − 5.641 | − 5.677 | − 5.811 |
|
| 11.79 | 12.02 | 11.88 | 13.15 | 13.17 | 13.59 | 13.67 | 13.93 |
|
| 0.985 | 0.989 | 0.995 | 0.990 | 0.996 | 0.981 | 0.978 | 0.997 |
|
| 87.40 | 89.96 | 88.47 | 99.32 | 99.69 | 102.71 | 103.36 | 105.80 |
| log | 10.08 | 10.31 | 10.17 | 11.38 | 11.40 | 11.82 | 11.89 | 12.14 |
| 0.348 | 0.286 | 0.318 | 0.255 | 0.239 | 0.271 | 0.264 | 0.240 | |
| 2.873 | 3.496 | 3.144 | 3.921 | 4.184 | 3.690 | 3.787 | 4.166 | |
Parameters a, b, and r2 were obtained from plotting logβ vs. TON−1 for all samples