Literature DB >> 33105015

Surgeon experience influences patient characteristics and outcomes in spine deformity surgery.

Alexander J Schupper1, Sean N Neifert2, Michael L Martini2, Jonathan S Gal3, Frank J Yuk2, John M Caridi2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To characterize differences in patient demographics and outcomes by surgeon experience in a cohort of patients undergoing adult spinal deformity surgery.
METHODS: Patients undergoing degenerative spinal deformity were included. Patients whose surgeons graduated from fellowship ≤ 5 years prior to surgery versus > 5 years were compared. Multivariable linear and logistic regression, controlling for age, sex, comorbidity burden, number of segments fused, blood loss and operative time were used to evaluate differences in outcomes. Characteristics of operative invasiveness were plotted against surgeons' level of experience, and trends in these measures were assessed with univariate linear regression.
RESULTS: Three-hundred sixty-three patients were included. 147 patients' surgeons had ≤ 5 years of experience. Patient demographics were evenly matched. Patients with junior surgeons had more pre-existing medical complications, and senior surgeons were less likely to take care of patients with Medicare/Medicaid (p < 0.001). Junior surgeons were more likely to operate on non-elective patients (p < 0.001). Patients of junior surgeons received larger fusions (9.6 vs. 7.6 segments fused, p < 0.001). There were no differences in complication rates or death. Patients of junior surgeons had longer overall length of stays (p = 0.037) and higher rates of nonhome discharge (OR 2.0, p < 0.001), 30- and 90-day (p < 0.005) ED visits, and higher costs (+ $8548, 95% CI: $1596 to $15,502; p = 0.016).
CONCLUSION: Junior surgeons tend to perform more extensive deformity operations on more medically complex patients compared to senior surgeons, associated with higher costs and more resource utilization than senior surgeons.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Complications; Cost; Deformity surgery; Readmission; Surgeon experience

Year:  2020        PMID: 33105015     DOI: 10.1007/s43390-020-00227-w

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine Deform        ISSN: 2212-134X


  12 in total

1.  A modification of the Elixhauser comorbidity measures into a point system for hospital death using administrative data.

Authors:  Carl van Walraven; Peter C Austin; Alison Jennings; Hude Quan; Alan J Forster
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 2.983

2.  Comorbidity measures for use with administrative data.

Authors:  A Elixhauser; C Steiner; D R Harris; R M Coffey
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 2.983

3.  Elixhauser Comorbidity Measure is Superior to Charlson Comorbidity Index In-Predicting Hospital Complications Following Elective Posterior Cervical Decompression and Fusion.

Authors:  Samuel Z Maron; Sean N Neifert; William A Ranson; Dominic A Nistal; Robert J Rothrock; Peter Cooke; Colin D Lamb; Samuel K Cho; John M Caridi
Journal:  World Neurosurg       Date:  2020-02-14       Impact factor: 2.104

4.  Adult Lumbar Scoliosis: Nonsurgical Versus Surgical Management.

Authors:  Jonathan Falakassa; Serena S Hu
Journal:  Instr Course Lect       Date:  2017-02-15

Review 5.  Complications and outcomes after spinal deformity surgery in the elderly: review of the existing literature and future directions.

Authors:  Doniel Drazin; Ali Shirzadi; Jack Rosner; Paula Eboli; Michael Safee; Eli M Baron; John C Liu; Frank L Acosta
Journal:  Neurosurg Focus       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 4.047

Review 6.  Adult scoliosis surgery outcomes: a systematic review.

Authors:  Sanjay Yadla; Mitchell G Maltenfort; John K Ratliff; James S Harrop
Journal:  Neurosurg Focus       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 4.047

7.  Coding algorithms for defining comorbidities in ICD-9-CM and ICD-10 administrative data.

Authors:  Hude Quan; Vijaya Sundararajan; Patricia Halfon; Andrew Fong; Bernard Burnand; Jean-Christophe Luthi; L Duncan Saunders; Cynthia A Beck; Thomas E Feasby; William A Ghali
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 2.983

8.  Long-term clinical and radiographic outcomes and patient satisfaction after adult spinal deformity correction.

Authors:  K Kyrölä; H Kautiainen; L Pekkanen; P Mäkelä; I Kiviranta; A Häkkinen
Journal:  Scand J Surg       Date:  2018-11-19       Impact factor: 2.360

9.  Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion with Rigid Interspinous Process Fixation: A Learning Curve Analysis of a Surgeon Team's First 74 Cases.

Authors:  Patrick Doherty; Arthur Welch; Jason Tharpe; Camille Moore; Chris Ferry
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2017-05-30

10.  The Japanese Scoliosis Society Morbidity and Mortality Survey in 2014: The Complication Trends of Spinal Deformity Surgery from 2012 to 2014.

Authors:  Ryo Sugawara; Katsushi Takeshita; Yasushi Inomata; Yasuhisa Arai; Masashi Takaso; Jun Takahashi; Hideo Hosoe; Manabu Itou
Journal:  Spine Surg Relat Res       Date:  2018-12-01
View more
  1 in total

1.  Trends in Intraoperative Assessment of Spinal Alignment: A Survey of Spine Surgeons in the United States.

Authors:  David M Gullotti; Amir H Soltanianzadeh; Saki Fujita; Miguel Inserni; Edward Ruppel; Nicholas G Franconi; Corinna Zygourakis; Themistocles Protopsaltis; Sheng-Fu Larry Lo; Daniel M Sciubba; Nicholas Theodore
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2022-04
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.