| Literature DB >> 32322716 |
Joice Camila Martins da Costa1, Karine Sayuri Lima Miki1, Amanda da Silva Ramos1, Bárbara Elisabeth Teixeira-Costa1,2.
Abstract
One of the most critical challenges for the food packaging industry to overcome is the development of biodegradable coatings from renewable sources. In this work, purple yam starch (PYS), chitosan (CS), and glycerol were blended to obtain biodegradable films for characterization as intended food coatings. The films had a homogeneous surface, and the amount of CS highly influenced the film thickness. Infrared spectroscopy indicated hydrogen bond interactions between PYS and CS in the films. Thermogram data suggested that glycerol contributed to the thermal stability of the films, due to its greater interaction with CS than to the PYS. Finally, the application of a YS/CS film on apples for 4 weeks was able to preserve the fruit quality, as weight loss from the coated apple was significantly lower than the uncoated apple (p = 0.44, Dunnet's posthoc test). YS/CS films have great prospects in the food packaging industry as a new biodegradable coating.Entities:
Keywords: Chitosan; Dioscorea trifida; Films; Food coating; Food science; Food technology; Materials science; Starch; Yam
Year: 2020 PMID: 32322716 PMCID: PMC7160431 DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e03718
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Heliyon ISSN: 2405-8440
Figure 1Digital photographs of purple yam roots (a) and its extracted starch (b).
Characterization of the purple yam flour (PYF), starch (PYS), and films based on PYS/chitosan (CS).
| Proximate composition | Flour (PYF) | Starch (PYS) |
|---|---|---|
| Moisture (g/100 g) | 67 ± 1 | 2.3 ± 0.1 |
| Protein (%) | 1.6 ± 0.7 | 0.50 ± 0.01 |
| Ash (%) | 1.5 ± 0.2 | 0.007 ± 0.003 |
| Fat (%) | 0.08 ± 0.01 | 0.12 ± 0.01 |
| Crude Fibre (%) | 2.16 ± 0.05 | 1.6 ± 0.1 |
| Carbohydrate (%) | 27.4 ± 0.4 | 95.3 ± 0.1 |
| WBC (%) | - | 174 ± 37 |
| pH | - | 4.1 ± 0.1 |
| Gel clarity (%T) | - | 39.5 ± 0.1 |
WBC, water-binding capacity. Results are expressed as mean ± SD. - Not determined. Different superscripts a, b letters in the same column indicate significantly different (p < 0.05) by Tukey's posthoc test.
Except for the moisture content, results are given on a dry basis (db).
Figure 2SEM photographs of purple yam starch (PYS) granules with magnification of 300x (a) and of 1000x (b). SEM photographs of yam starch (YS)/chitosan (CS) films: surface of YS/CS0 (c) and its cross-section (d); surface of YS/CS0.5 (e) and its cross-section (f); surface of YS/CS1.0 (g) and its cross-section (h).
Figure 3X-ray diffractogram (a) of purple yam starch (PYS) in the 2θ region of 2°–50° and FTIR spectra (b) of PYS (purple line), chitosan (red line), YS/CS0 (black line), YS/CS0.5 (blue line) and YS/CS1.0 (green line).
Figure 4TG (a) and DTG curves (b) of PYS (purple line), chitosan (red line), YS/CS0 (black line), YS/CS0.5 (blue line) and YS/CS1.0 (green line).
Figure 5Weight loss of coated apples vs time (30 days) (a) and digital photographs of the internal appearance of the apples coated with YS/CS0 (b), YS/CS0.5 (c), YS/CS1.0 (d) and without coating (WC) (e).