| Literature DB >> 32322594 |
Alberto Fragoso1, Mérida Pedraza-Jiménez1, Laura Espinoza-González1, María Luisa Ceja-Mendoza1, Hugo Sánchez-Mercado1, Gloria Robles-Pérez1, Julio Granados1,2, Emilio Medina-Rivero3.
Abstract
A complex mixture of peptides plays a key role in the regulation of the immune system; different sources as raw materials mainly from animals and vegetables have been reported to provide these extracts. The batch-to-batch product consistency depends on in-process controls established. However, when an immunomodulator is a customized product obtained from the same volunteer who will receive the product to personalize the treatment, the criteria to establish the consistency between volunteers are different. In this sense, it is expected to have the same molecular weight range although the profile of peptide abundance is different. Here, we characterized the peptide profile of three extracts of an immunomodulator obtained from the urine of different volunteers suffering from three different diseases (i.e., allergic rhinitis, rheumatoid arthritis, and chronic rhinopharyngitis), using size exclusion chromatography (SEC) and mass spectrometry (MS). The peptides contained in the immunomodulators were stable after six months, stored in a refrigerator. Our results showed a chromatographic profile with the same range of low molecular weight (less than 17 kDa) in all analyzed samples by SEC; these results were also confirmed by MS showing an exact mass spectrum from 3 to 13 kDa. The fact that the peptide profiles were conserved during a six-month period at refrigeration conditions (2 to 8°C) maintaining the quality and stability of the immunomodulator supports the notion that it might be an alternative in the treatment of chronic hypersensibility disorders.Entities:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32322594 PMCID: PMC7154977 DOI: 10.1155/2020/3683782
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Immunol Res ISSN: 2314-7156 Impact factor: 4.818
Figure 1Peptide mass distribution of the immunomodulator by size exclusion chromatography. The main figure shows the characteristic chromatographic profile of the immunomodulator (blue line), the molecular weight marker (dotted line), and matrix (black line). At the right side, it shows the consistency in the mass distribution of three immunomodulators obtained from different volunteers.
Figure 2Immunomodulator exact mass distribution spectra obtained from (a) volunteer 1 with allergic rhinitis, (b) volunteer 2 with arthritis rheumatoid, and (c) volunteer 3 with chronic rhinopharyngitis. The horizontal and vertical axes show the mass in daltons and the intensity generated by ionized peptides, respectively.
Design of the stability test of immunomodulator.
| Test | Method | Time point for sample analysis (months) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 3 | 6 | ||
| Appearance | Visual | X | X | X |
| pH | Potentiometric | X | X | X |
| Total protein | UV | X | X | X |
| Mass distribution | SEC | X | X | X |
| Sterility | Microorganisms culture | X | ND | X |
ND: not determined.
Resume of stability test of the immunomodulator at 5 ± 3°C.
| Test | Specification | Results of the analyses in each time | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 3 | 6 | ||||||||
| V1 | V2 | V3 | V1 | V2 | V3 | V1 | V2 | V3 | ||
| Appearance | Clear and colorless liquid | C | C | C | C | C | C | C | C | C |
| pH | 5 to 7 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 7 | 7 | 7 | 7 | 7 | 7 |
| Total protein | 5.5 to 7.5 mg/mL | 6.9 | 6.5 | 6.5 | 6.6 | 6.5 | 6.4 | 7.2 | 6.8 | 7.0 |
| Mass distribution | Peptide distribution < 17.0 kDa | C | C | C | C | C | C | C | C | C |
| Sterility | Sterile | C | C | C | ND | ND | ND | C | C | C |
ND: not determined; V: volunteer; C: comply.
Figure 3Size distribution profile of immunomodulator product by SEC during stability test at started time (gray line) and after six months (black line). The immunomodulator was produced from (a) volunteer 1, (b) volunteer 2, and (c) volunteer 3.