Literature DB >> 21849549

The phase of ongoing oscillations mediates the causal relation between brain excitation and visual perception.

Laura Dugué1, Philippe Marque, Rufin VanRullen.   

Abstract

Why does neuronal activity in sensory brain areas sometimes give rise to perception, and sometimes not? Although neuronal noise is often invoked as the key factor, a portion of this variability could also be due to the history and current state of the brain affecting cortical excitability. Here we directly test this idea by examining whether the phase of prestimulus oscillatory activity is causally linked with modulations of cortical excitability and with visual perception. Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) was applied over human visual cortex to induce illusory perceptions (phosphenes) while electroencephalograms (EEGs) were simultaneously recorded. Subjects reported the presence or absence of an induced phosphene following a single pulse of TMS at perceptual threshold. The phase of ongoing alpha (∼10 Hz) oscillations within 400 ms before the pulse significantly covaried with the perceptual outcome. This effect was observed in occipital regions around the site of TMS, as well as in a distant frontocentral region. In both regions, we found a systematic relationship between prepulse EEG phase and perceptual performance: phosphene probability changed by ∼15% between opposite phases. In summary, we provide direct evidence for a chain of causal relations between the phase of ongoing oscillations, neuronal excitability, and visual perception: ongoing oscillations create periodic "windows of excitability," with sensory perception being more likely to occur at specific phases.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21849549      PMCID: PMC6623205          DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1161-11.2011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  115 in total

1.  Phase reset affects auditory-visual simultaneity judgment.

Authors:  Jun Kambe; Yuta Kakimoto; Osamu Araki
Journal:  Cogn Neurodyn       Date:  2015-05-01       Impact factor: 5.082

2.  Cortical localization of phase and amplitude dynamics predicting access to somatosensory awareness.

Authors:  Jonni Hirvonen; Satu Palva
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2015-10-20       Impact factor: 5.038

3.  Beta oscillations define discrete perceptual cycles in the somatosensory domain.

Authors:  Thomas J Baumgarten; Alfons Schnitzler; Joachim Lange
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-08-31       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Pre-cue fronto-occipital alpha phase and distributed cortical oscillations predict failures of cognitive control.

Authors:  Jordan P Hamm; Kara A Dyckman; Jennifer E McDowell; Brett A Clementz
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2012-05-16       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Flexible frequency control of cortical oscillations enables computations required for working memory.

Authors:  Mario Dipoppa; Boris S Gutkin
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-07-15       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 6.  Improving N1 classification by grouping EEG trials with phases of pre-stimulus EEG oscillations.

Authors:  Li Han; Zhang Liang; Zhang Jiacai; Wang Changming; Yao Li; Wu Xia; Guo Xiaojuan
Journal:  Cogn Neurodyn       Date:  2014-11-19       Impact factor: 5.082

7.  Attention Periodically Binds Visual Features As Single Events Depending on Neural Oscillations Phase-Locked to Action.

Authors:  Ryohei Nakayama; Isamu Motoyoshi
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2019-03-18       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Reward makes the rhythmic sampling of spatial attention emerge earlier.

Authors:  Zhongbin Su; Lihui Wang; Guanlan Kang; Xiaolin Zhou
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2021-01-13       Impact factor: 2.199

9.  Pre-stimulus theta power is correlated with variation of motor evoked potential latency: a single-pulse TMS study.

Authors:  Zafer İşcan; Aaron Schurger; Marine Vernet; Jacobo D Sitt; Antoni Valero-Cabré
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2018-08-16       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 10.  The θ-γ neural code.

Authors:  John E Lisman; Ole Jensen
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2013-03-20       Impact factor: 17.173

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.