| Literature DB >> 32317769 |
Suvendu Das1, Hyo Suk Gwon2, Muhammad Israr Khan2, Seung Tak Jeong2, Pil Joo Kim3,4.
Abstract
With the inclass="Chemical">creEntities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32317769 PMCID: PMC7174330 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-63783-1
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Effects of LD slag amendment on soil biochemical properties, photosynthetic rate, and yield attributes of Japonica and Indica rice cultivars.
| Parameters | Japonica | Indica | Statistical analysis | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control | + LD slag | Control | + LD slag | Slag | Cultivar | Slag × Cultivar | |
| Soil pH | 5.95 b | 6.06 a | 6.05 b | 6.20 a | 6.91 * | 1.18 ns | 0.09 ns |
| Soil Eh | −64.0 a | −67.0 a | −68.0 a | −72.0 a | 0.06 ns | 1.37 ns | 0.72 ns |
| SOC (g kg−1) | 27.6 b | 30.8 a | 28.1 b | 32.2 a | 8.84 * | 0.54 ns | 0.13 ns |
| MBC (mg kg−1) | 93 b | 496 a | 412 b | 537 a | 81.6 *** | 5.34 * | 0.47 ns |
| RMC (mg kg−1) | 177 b | 243 a | 192 b | 274 a | 106 *** | 11.6 * | 1.78 ns |
| NRN (mg kg−1) | 5.52 a | 4.67 b | 5.66 a | 4.71 b | 39.8*** | 0.38 ns | 0.13 ns |
| AP (mg kg−1) | 76.6 b | 102 a | 74.8 b | 99.5 a | 46.1 *** | 0.49 ns | 0.03 ns |
| aqSi (µM) | 51.8 b | 517 a | 55.7 b | 456 a | 725 *** | 53.1 *** | 8.08 * |
| aqFe (µM) | 175 b | 456 a | 121 b | 343 a | 259 *** | 48.6 *** | 7.38 * |
| K+ (cmol+ kg−1) | 1.16 a | 1.37 a | 1.13 a | 1.30 a | 2.34 ns | 0.14 ns | 0.02 ns |
| Ca2+ (cmol+ kg−1) | 6.23 b | 9.18 a | 6.27 b | 9.21 a | 123 *** | 0.04 ns | 0.003 ns |
| Mg2+ (cmol+ kg−1) | 1.33 b | 2.13 a | 1.20 b | 1.98 a | 30.7 *** | 0.14 ns | 0.02 ns |
| †Photosynthetic rate (µ mol m-2 s−1) | 20.3 b | 24.6 a | 22.3 b | 26.3 a | 16.6 ** | 1.21 ns | 0.06 ns |
| Grain yield (g pot-1) | 8.16 b | 9.40 a | 7.63 b | 8.67 a | 14.3 ** | 5.45 * | 0.12 ns |
| Straw yield (g pot−1) | 27.6 b | 33.1 a | 38.4 b | 46.8 a | 6.37 * | 19.7 ** | 0.28 ns |
| Above ground biomass (g pot−1) | 35.8 b | 42.5 a | 46.0 b | 55.5 a | 10.1 ** | 20.5 ** | 0.29 ns |
| Root biomass (g pot−1) | 7.41 b | 8.69 a | 11.4 b | 13.6 a | 5.83 * | 0.11 ns | 0.008 ns |
| Straw N content (mg g−1) | 4.63 b | 5.57 a | 4.80 b | 5.87 a | 21.4 *** | 1.16 ns | 0.09 ns |
| Straw P content (mg g−1) | 1.29 b | 1.51 a | 1.32 b | 1.56 a | 18.3 *** | 1.19 ns | 0.11 ns |
| Straw K content (mg g−1) | 12.3 a | 13.1 a | 13.9 a | 14.8 a | 2.24 ns | 0.21 ns | 0.011 ns |
| Straw Si content (mg g−1) | 32.9 b | 42.7 a | 34.8 b | 45.5 a | 135 *** | 6.23 * | 0.23 ns |
Means of three replicates per treatment are presented. Values in the same row under different cultivar followed by different letters are significantly different at P < 0.05 according to Tukey’s HSD test. In ‘Statistical analysis’ F value followed by significant label (P) are provised. ***, **, *, and ns indicates Significant at P < 0.001, at P < 0.01, at P < 0.05, and non significance, respectively. RMC, readily mineralizable carbon; NRN, ninhydrin nitrogen content; AP, available P, aq, water soluble. †Average photosynthetic rate estimated at 42, 70, and 105 DAT (Fig. S1).
The LD slag amendment effects on nutrient uptake of rice straw.
| Japonica | Indica | Indica/Japonica | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control | + LD slag | Control | + LD slag | IN CONTROL | |
| Straw yield (g pot−1) | 27.6 | 33.1 | 38.4 | 46.8 | |
| N content (mg g−1) straw | 4.63 | 5.57 | 4.8 | 5.87 | |
| N uptake (mg, straw only) | 128 | 184 | 184 | 275 | 44% |
| Si content (mg g−1) straw | 32.9 | 42.7 | 34.8 | 45.5 | |
| Si uptake (mg, straw only) | 908 | 1414 | 1339 | 2132 | |
| Si uptake (g, straw only) | 0.91 | 1.41 | 1.34 | 2.13 | 47% |
| P content (mg g−1) straw | 1.29 | 1.51 | 1.32 | 1.56 | |
| P uptake (mg, straw only) | 36 | 50 | 51 | 73 | 42% |
| K content (mg g−1) straw | 12.3 | 13.1 | 13.9 | 14.8 | |
| K uptake (mg, straw only) | 340 | 434 | 532 | 694 | |
| K uptake (g, straw only) | 0.34 | 0.43 | 0.53 | 0.69 | 56% |
Figure 1(a) Enzymatic profiles of soil based on the hydrolytic activities assessed by the APIZYM system. Values are the mean of triplicate observations, (b) Heatmap depicting significant differences in soil enzyme activities among the treatments. The relative abundance of soil enzyme activities is depicted by color intensity. The relative abundance of soil enzyme activities in different samples is colored in shades of yellow (low relative abundance) to red (high relative abundance) through orange. CJ, Japonica without slag; LDJ, Japonica with slag; CI, Indica without slag; LDI, Indica with slag.
Figure 2The relative abundance of major (≥1.0%) phylogenetic groups (a) and genera (b) in the rice rhizosphere as influenced by the LD slag amendment. The relative abundance is presented in terms of percentage in total bacterial sequences per sample. Significantly altered phylogenetic groups and genera were presented in term of response ratio at 95% confidence interval (CI). CJ, Japonica without slag; LDJ, Japonica with slag; CI, Indica without slag; LDI, Indica with slag.
The LD slag amendment impacts on bacterial α-diversity indices.
| Japonica | Indica | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control | + LD slag | Control | + LD slag | |
| Margalef’s richness | 736 b | 771 a | 744 b | 788 a |
| Pielou’s evenness | 0.87 a | 0.82 b | 0.85 a | 0.80 b |
| Shannon Diversity | 8.19 b | 8.46 a | 8.25 b | 8.52 a |
Means of three replicates per treatment are presented. In a row under different rice cultivars means followed by a common letter are not significantly different at P < 0.05.
Correlation coefficient (r) between soil variables and bacterial community determined by Mantel test†.
| Soil variables | Overall | Slag | Control |
|---|---|---|---|
| Soil pH | 0.38* | 0.56** | 0.16 ns |
| Soil Eh | 0.06 ns | 0.03 ns | 0.11 ns |
| SOC | 0.44* | 0.46* | 0.24 ns |
| MBC | 0.49* | 0.54** | 0.34* |
| RMC | 0.62** | 0.65** | 0.36* |
| NRN | −0.38 * | −0.39* | 0.11 ns |
| AP | 0.34* | 0.36* | 0.08 ns |
| aqSi | 0.59** | 0.67** | 0.38* |
| aqFe | 0.43* | 0.51** | 0.35* |
| K+ | 0.11 ns | 0.18 ns | 0.06 ns |
| Ca2+ | 0.24 ns | 0.26 ns | 0.13 ns |
| Mg2+ | 0.13 ns | 0.15 ns | 0.11 ns |
| Photosynthetic rate | 0.54** | 0.42 * | 0.23 ns |
| Above ground biomass | 0.37* | 0.36* | 0.22 ns |
| Belowground (Root) biomass | 0.34* | 0.39* | 0.43* |
| Straw N uptake | 0.43* | 0.44* | 0.39* |
| Straw P uptake | 0.33* | 0.34* | 0.31* |
| Straw K uptake | 0.19 ns | 0.11 ns | 0.24 ns |
| Straw Si uptake | 0.56** | 0.68** | 0.35* |
†Permutations, 9,999 (using the relative abundances of OTU as input in the analysis).
**Significant at P < 0.01, *Significant at P < 0.05, ns not significant. Abbreviations for soil variables are given in Table 1.
Figure 3Canonical correspondence analysis (CCA) relating selected soil and plant variables to major phylogenetic groups (a) and genera (b). The resulting ordination biplot approximated the weighted average of each group/taxa with regard to each of the measured variables, which are represented as arrows. The lengths of these arrows indicate the relative importance of measured variables, whereas the angle between the arrows and the axis reflects the degree to which they are correlated. To statistically evaluate the significance (P < 0.01) of the first canonical axis and of all canonical axes together, the Monte Carlo permutation full model test with 999 unrestricted permutations was performed. MBC, Microbial biomass C; SOC, soil organic C; RMC, readily mineralizable C; NRN, ninhydrin nitrogen content; AP, available P, aq, water soluble; Pho, photosynthesis; AgM, Aboveground biomass; BgM, Belowground biomass; and P-N, P-P, P-K, and P-Si are straw N, P, K, and Si uptake, respectively.
Figure 4Variation partitioning analysis (VPA) of rhizosphere bacterial communities among important plant parameters, soil nutrient status, soil pH, and their interactions. The values in parentheses are P-values. Abbreviations for the measured variables are provided in Fig. 3.