Literature DB >> 32316869

Emissions and health risks from the use of 3D printers in an occupational setting.

Felix L Chan1,2, Chun-Yip Hon3, Susan M Tarlo1,2,4,5, Nikhil Rajaram1,2, Ronald House1,2,4,5.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to determine concentrations of particulates and volatile organic compounds (VOCs) emitted from 3D printers using polylactic acid (PLA) filaments at a university workroom to assess exposure and health risks in an occupational setting. Under typical-case (one printer) and worst-case (three printers operating simultaneously) scenarios, particulate concentration (total and respirable), VOCs and formaldehyde were measured. Air samples were collected in the printing room and adjacent hallway. Size-resolved levels of nano-diameter particles were also collected in the printing room. Total particulate levels were higher in the worst-case scenario (0.7 mg/m3) vs. typical-case scenario (0.3 mg/m3). Respirable particulate and formaldehyde concentrations were similar between the two scenarios. Size-resolved measurements showed that most particles ranged from approximately 27 to 116 nm. Total VOC levels were approximately 6-fold higher during the worst-case scenario vs. typical situation with isopropyl alcohol being the predominant VOC. Airborne concentrations in the hallway were generally lower than inside the printing room. All measurements were below their respective occupational exposure limits. In summary, emissions of particulates and VOCs increased when multiple 3D printers were operating simultaneously. Airborne levels in the adjacent hallway were similar between the two scenarios. Overall, data suggest a low risk of significant and persistent adverse health effects. Nevertheless, the health effects attributed to 3D printing are not fully known and adherence to good hygiene principles is recommended during use of this technology.

Entities:  

Keywords:  3D printing; indoor air quality; occupational assessment; particulates; volatile organic compounds (VOC)

Year:  2020        PMID: 32316869     DOI: 10.1080/15287394.2020.1751758

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Toxicol Environ Health A        ISSN: 0098-4108


  7 in total

1.  A review of 3D printing techniques for environmental applications.

Authors:  Mallikarjuna N Nadagouda; Megan Ginn; Vandita Rastogi
Journal:  Curr Opin Chem Eng       Date:  2020       Impact factor: 5.163

Review 2.  Identification of effective control technologies for additive manufacturing.

Authors:  Johan du Plessis; Sonette du Preez; Aleksandr B Stefaniak
Journal:  J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev       Date:  2022-06-26       Impact factor: 8.071

3.  Towards sustainable additive manufacturing: The need for awareness of particle and vapor releases during polymer recycling, making filament, and fused filament fabrication 3-D printing.

Authors:  Aleksandr B Stefaniak; Lauren N Bowers; Gabe Cottrell; Ergin Erdem; Alycia K Knepp; Stephen B Martin; Jack Pretty; Matthew G Duling; Elizabeth D Arnold; Zachary Wilson; Benjamin Krider; Alyson R Fortner; Ryan F LeBouf; M Abbas Virji; Arif Sirinterlikci
Journal:  Resour Conserv Recycl       Date:  2022-01       Impact factor: 13.716

4.  Development and Validation of a Novel Tool for Assessing the Environmental Impact of 3D Printing Technologies: A Pharmaceutical Perspective.

Authors:  Souha H Youssef; Sadikalmahdi Abdella; Sanjay Garg
Journal:  Pharmaceutics       Date:  2022-04-25       Impact factor: 6.525

5.  Additive Manufacturing for Occupational Hygiene: A Comprehensive Review of Processes, Emissions, & Exposures.

Authors:  A B Stefaniak; S Du Preez; J L Du Plessis
Journal:  J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev       Date:  2021-06-17       Impact factor: 6.393

6.  Prevention through design: insights from computational fluid dynamics modeling to predict exposure to ultrafine particles from 3D printing.

Authors:  Robert I MacCuspie; W Cary Hill; Daniel R Hall; Andrey Korchevskiy; Cassidy D Strode; Alan J Kennedy; Mark L Ballentine; Taylor Rycroft; Matthew S Hull
Journal:  J Toxicol Environ Health A       Date:  2021-02-28

7.  Exploring Methods for Surveillance of Occupational Exposure from Additive Manufacturing in Four Different Industrial Facilities.

Authors:  Gunilla Runström Eden; Håkan Tinnerberg; Lars Rosell; Rickie Möller; Ann-Charlotte Almstrand; Anna Bredberg
Journal:  Ann Work Expo Health       Date:  2022-02-18       Impact factor: 2.179

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.