Literature DB >> 35982992

Towards sustainable additive manufacturing: The need for awareness of particle and vapor releases during polymer recycling, making filament, and fused filament fabrication 3-D printing.

Aleksandr B Stefaniak1, Lauren N Bowers1, Gabe Cottrell2, Ergin Erdem2, Alycia K Knepp1, Stephen B Martin1, Jack Pretty3, Matthew G Duling1, Elizabeth D Arnold1, Zachary Wilson2, Benjamin Krider2, Alyson R Fortner1, Ryan F LeBouf1, M Abbas Virji1, Arif Sirinterlikci2.   

Abstract

Fused filament fabrication three-dimensional (FFF 3-D) printing is thought to be environmentally sustainable; however, significant amounts of waste can be generated from this technology. One way to improve its sustainability is via distributed recycling of plastics in homes, schools, and libraries to create feedstock filament for printing. Risks from exposures incurred during recycling and reuse of plastics has not been incorporated into life cycle assessments. This study characterized contaminant releases from virgin (unextruded) and recycled plastics from filament production through FFF 3-D printing. Waste polylactic acid (PLA) and acrylonitrile butadiene styrene (ABS) plastics were recycled to create filament; virgin PLA, ABS, high and low density polyethylenes, high impact polystyrene, and polypropylene pellets were also extruded into filament. The release of particles and chemicals into school classrooms was evaluated using standard industrial hygiene methodologies. All tasks released particles that contained hazardous metals (e.g., manganese) and with size capable of depositing in the gas exchange region of the lung, i.e., granulation of waste PLA and ABS (667 to 714 nm) and filament making (608 to 711 nm) and FFF 3-D printing (616 to 731 nm) with waste and virgin plastics. All tasks released vapors, including respiratory irritants and potential carcinogens (benzene and formaldehyde), mucus membrane irritants (acetone, xylenes, ethylbenzene, and methyl methacrylate), and asthmagens (styrene, multiple carbonyl compounds). These data are useful for incorporating risks of exposure to hazardous contaminants in future life cycle evaluations to demonstrate the sustainability and circular economy potential of FFF 3-D printing in distributed spaces.

Entities:  

Keywords:  3-D printing; Circular economy; Health; Libraries; Plastics; Schools

Year:  2022        PMID: 35982992      PMCID: PMC9380603          DOI: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2021.105911

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Resour Conserv Recycl        ISSN: 0921-3449            Impact factor:   13.716


  21 in total

1.  Characterization of particulate and gaseous pollutants emitted during operation of a desktop 3D printer.

Authors:  Jianwei Gu; Michael Wensing; Erik Uhde; Tunga Salthammer
Journal:  Environ Int       Date:  2019-01-05       Impact factor: 9.621

2.  Ventilation rates in recently constructed U.S. school classrooms.

Authors:  S Batterman; F-C Su; A Wald; F Watkins; C Godwin; G Thun
Journal:  Indoor Air       Date:  2017-05-03       Impact factor: 5.770

Review 3.  Non-malignant respiratory disease among workers in industries using styrene-A review of the evidence.

Authors:  Randall J Nett; Jean M Cox-Ganser; Ann F Hubbs; Avima M Ruder; Kristin J Cummings; Yuh-Chin T Huang; Kathleen Kreiss
Journal:  Am J Ind Med       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 2.214

4.  Airborne particle emission of a commercial 3D printer: the effect of filament material and printing temperature.

Authors:  L Stabile; M Scungio; G Buonanno; F Arpino; G Ficco
Journal:  Indoor Air       Date:  2016-06-29       Impact factor: 5.770

5.  Technical control of nanoparticle emissions from desktop 3D printing.

Authors:  Anna-Kaisa Viitanen; Kimmo Kallonen; Kirsi Kukko; Tomi Kanerva; Erkka Saukko; Tareq Hussein; Kaarle Hämeri; Arto Säämänen
Journal:  Indoor Air       Date:  2021-03-01       Impact factor: 5.770

6.  The characteristics and formation mechanisms of emissions from thermal decomposition of 3D printer polymer filaments.

Authors:  Shirun Ding; Bing Feng Ng; Xiaopeng Shang; Hu Liu; Xuehong Lu; Man Pun Wan
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2019-07-17       Impact factor: 7.963

7.  Particle emissions from fused deposition modeling 3D printers: Evaluation and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Peter Byrley; Barbara Jane George; William K Boyes; Kim Rogers
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2018-11-12       Impact factor: 7.963

8.  Emissions and health risks from the use of 3D printers in an occupational setting.

Authors:  Felix L Chan; Chun-Yip Hon; Susan M Tarlo; Nikhil Rajaram; Ronald House
Journal:  J Toxicol Environ Health A       Date:  2020-04-21

9.  A chamber study of alkyl nitrate production formed by terpene ozonolysis in the presence of NO and alkanes.

Authors:  Stephen R Jackson; Joel C Harrison; Jason E Ham; J R Wells
Journal:  Atmos Environ (1994)       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 4.798

10.  Costs, Benefits, and Adoption of Additive Manufacturing: A Supply Chain Perspective.

Authors:  Douglas Thomas
Journal:  Int J Adv Manuf Technol       Date:  2015-11-14       Impact factor: 3.226

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Identification of effective control technologies for additive manufacturing.

Authors:  Johan du Plessis; Sonette du Preez; Aleksandr B Stefaniak
Journal:  J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev       Date:  2022-06-26       Impact factor: 8.071

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.