Literature DB >> 33641630

Prevention through design: insights from computational fluid dynamics modeling to predict exposure to ultrafine particles from 3D printing.

Robert I MacCuspie1, W Cary Hill1, Daniel R Hall2, Andrey Korchevskiy2, Cassidy D Strode2, Alan J Kennedy3, Mark L Ballentine3, Taylor Rycroft3, Matthew S Hull1,4.   

Abstract

Fused filament fabrication (FFF) 3D printers are increasingly used in industrial, academic, military, and residential sectors, yet their emissions and associated user exposure scenarios are not fully described. Characterization of potential user exposure and environmental releases requires robust investigation. During operation, common FFF 3D printers emit varying amounts of ultrafine particles (UFPs) depending upon feedstock material and operation procedures. Volatile organic compounds associated with these emissions exhibit distinct odors; however, the UFP portion is largely imperceptible by humans. This investigation presents straightforward computational modeling as well as experimental validation to provide actionable insights for the proactive design of lower exposure spaces where 3D printers may be used. Specifically, data suggest that forced clean airflows may create lower exposure spaces, and that computational modeling might be employed to predict these spaces with reasonable accuracy to assist with room design. The configuration and positioning of room air ventilation diffusers may be a key factor in identifying lower exposure spaces. A workflow of measuring emissions during a printing process in an ANSI/CAN/UL 2904 environmental chamber was used to provide data for computational fluid dynamics (CFD) modeling of a 6 m2 room. Measurements of the particle concentrations in a Class 1000 clean room of identical geometry were found to pass the Hanna test for agreement between model and experimental data, validating the findings.

Entities:  

Keywords:  3D printer emissions; additive manufacturing; computational fluid dynamics; exposure; indoor air quality; ultrafine particles

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33641630      PMCID: PMC8044021          DOI: 10.1080/15287394.2021.1886210

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Toxicol Environ Health A        ISSN: 0098-4108


  38 in total

1.  Characterization of chemical contaminants generated by a desktop fused deposition modeling 3-dimensional Printer.

Authors:  Aleksandr B Stefaniak; Ryan F LeBouf; Jinghai Yi; Jason Ham; Timothy Nurkewicz; Diane E Schwegler-Berry; Bean T Chen; J Raymond Wells; Matthew G Duling; Robert B Lawrence; Stephen B Martin; Alyson R Johnson; M Abbas Virji
Journal:  J Occup Environ Hyg       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 2.155

2.  Moving beyond mass: the unmet need to consider dose metrics in environmental nanotoxicology studies.

Authors:  M Hull; A J Kennedy; C Detzel; P Vikesland; M A Chappell
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2012-10-03       Impact factor: 9.028

Review 3.  Understanding Nanoparticle Toxicity Mechanisms To Inform Redesign Strategies To Reduce Environmental Impact.

Authors:  Joseph T Buchman; Natalie V Hudson-Smith; Kaitlin M Landy; Christy L Haynes
Journal:  Acc Chem Res       Date:  2019-06-03       Impact factor: 22.384

4.  Perspectives on the design of safer nanomaterials and manufacturing processes.

Authors:  Charles Geraci; Donna Heidel; Christie Sayes; Laura Hodson; Paul Schulte; Adrienne Eastlake; Sara Brenner
Journal:  J Nanopart Res       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 2.253

5.  Health survey of employees regularly using 3D printers.

Authors:  F L Chan; R House; I Kudla; J C Lipszyc; N Rajaram; S M Tarlo
Journal:  Occup Med (Lond)       Date:  2018-05-17       Impact factor: 1.611

6.  Characterization and Control of Nanoparticle Emission during 3D Printing.

Authors:  Ohhun Kwon; Chungsik Yoon; Seunghon Ham; Jihoon Park; Jinho Lee; Danbi Yoo; Yoojin Kim
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2017-08-30       Impact factor: 9.028

7.  Association Between Personal Protective Equipment Use and Injury Occurrence Among the Republic of Korea Armed Forces.

Authors:  Tae Kyung Kim; Byung-Chan Jeon; Eunkyoung Bae; Kyoung Ki Bae; Kyu-Tae Han; Eun-Cheol Park
Journal:  Mil Med       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 1.437

Review 8.  The carcinogenic potential of nanomaterials, their release from products and options for regulating them.

Authors:  Heidi Becker; Frank Herzberg; Agnes Schulte; Marike Kolossa-Gehring
Journal:  Int J Hyg Environ Health       Date:  2010-12-17       Impact factor: 5.840

9.  Particle distribution in lung and lymph node tissues of rats and dogs and the migration of particle-containing alveolar cells in vitro.

Authors:  H L Mueller; B Robinson; B A Muggenburg; N A Gillett; R A Guilmette
Journal:  J Toxicol Environ Health       Date:  1990-07

10.  Emissions of Ultrafine Particles and Volatile Organic Compounds from Commercially Available Desktop Three-Dimensional Printers with Multiple Filaments.

Authors:  Parham Azimi; Dan Zhao; Claire Pouzet; Neil E Crain; Brent Stephens
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2016-01-15       Impact factor: 9.028

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Human exposure to metals in consumer-focused fused filament fabrication (FFF)/ 3D printing processes.

Authors:  Getachew Tedla; Annie M Jarabek; Peter Byrley; William Boyes; Kim Rogers
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2021-12-25       Impact factor: 7.963

Review 2.  Identification of effective control technologies for additive manufacturing.

Authors:  Johan du Plessis; Sonette du Preez; Aleksandr B Stefaniak
Journal:  J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev       Date:  2022-06-26       Impact factor: 8.071

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.