Literature DB >> 32314976

Chinese Public's Attention to the COVID-19 Epidemic on Social Media: Observational Descriptive Study.

Yuxin Zhao1, Sixiang Cheng1, Xiaoyan Yu1, Huilan Xu1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Since the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) epidemic in China in December 2019, information and discussions about COVID-19 have spread rapidly on the internet and have quickly become the focus of worldwide attention, especially on social media.
OBJECTIVE: This study aims to investigate and analyze the public's attention to events related to COVID-19 in China at the beginning of the COVID-19 epidemic (December 31, 2019, to February 20, 2020) through the Sina Microblog hot search list.
METHODS: We collected topics related to the COVID-19 epidemic on the Sina Microblog hot search list from December 31, 2019, to February 20, 2020, and described the trend of public attention on COVID-19 epidemic-related topics. ROST Content Mining System version 6.0 was used to analyze the collected text for word segmentation, word frequency, and sentiment analysis. We further described the hot topic keywords and sentiment trends of public attention. We used VOSviewer to implement a visual cluster analysis of hot keywords and build a social network of public opinion content.
RESULTS: The study has four main findings. First, we analyzed the changing trend of the public's attention to the COVID-19 epidemic, which can be divided into three stages. Second, the hot topic keywords of public attention at each stage were slightly different. Third, the emotional tendency of the public toward the COVID-19 epidemic-related hot topics changed from negative to neutral, with negative emotions weakening and positive emotions increasing as a whole. Fourth, we divided the COVID-19 topics with the most public concern into five categories: the situation of the new cases of COVID-19 and its impact, frontline reporting of the epidemic and the measures of prevention and control, expert interpretation and discussion on the source of infection, medical services on the frontline of the epidemic, and focus on the worldwide epidemic and the search for suspected cases.
CONCLUSIONS: Our study found that social media (eg, Sina Microblog) can be used to measure public attention toward public health emergencies. During the epidemic of the novel coronavirus, a large amount of information about the COVID-19 epidemic was disseminated on Sina Microblog and received widespread public attention. We have learned about the hotspots of public concern regarding the COVID-19 epidemic. These findings can help the government and health departments better communicate with the public on health and translate public health needs into practice to create targeted measures to prevent and control the spread of COVID-19. ©Yuxin Zhao, Sixiang Cheng, Xiaoyan Yu, Huilan Xu. Originally published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research (http://www.jmir.org), 04.05.2020.

Entities:  

Keywords:  COVID-19; China; Sina Microblog; infodemic; public attention; public health emergency; social media

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32314976      PMCID: PMC7199804          DOI: 10.2196/18825

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Internet Res        ISSN: 1438-8871            Impact factor:   5.428


Introduction

The coronavirus disease (COVID-19) is a new infectious disease that is mainly transmitted by respiratory droplets and contact, and is generally infectious to human beings [1]. On January 11, 2020, after pathogenic nucleic acid testing, China reported 41 cases of pneumonia that were infected with the novel coronavirus [2]. On January 30, 2020, the World Health Organization (WHO) listed the novel coronavirus epidemic as a Public Health Emergency of International Concern [3]. As of February 20, 2020, a total of 75,465 confirmed cases and 2236 deaths have been reported in mainland China [4]. The novel coronavirus has caused great challenges and threats to public health in China and has quickly become the focus of worldwide attention. Information and discussions about COVID-19 have spread rapidly online, especially on social media. To fight against COVID-19 and promote the prevention and control of the epidemic, researchers have recently made efforts in various aspects. The research has involved topics such as epidemiological research [5-7], diagnostic methods for COVID-19 [8-11], clinical characteristics of the disease [12-16], characteristics of disease transmission [17-19], development of candidate therapies [20-22], and the identification of animal hosts [22-26]. However, there has been no research conducted on the public’s attention to COVID-19. Since public participation is required to prevent and control the epidemic spread of infectious diseases, it is extremely important to learn about the public’s attention toward COVID-19 during the current epidemic. Such knowledge is of great significance when guiding people to respond appropriately to the epidemic and helping them learn how to cope with the sudden infectious diseases such as COVID-19, and it also supports social stability [27]. Social media has developed rapidly in recent years. Increasing numbers of public health departments and individuals are using social media platforms to communicate and share information during public health emergencies. Social media has become an important channel for promoting risk communication during the crisis [28,29]. The use of social media to measure public attention has also been gradually applied to research on infectious diseases such as H7N9 [27,30,31], Ebola [28,32-36], Zika virus [29,37,38], Middle East respiratory syndrome-related coronavirus [39], and Dengue fever [40]. In addition, to help countries respond better to the spread of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), the WHO has issued operational planning guidelines, requiring countries to take specific actions around the eight pillars. Risk Communication and Community Engagement, one of the eight pillars, plays an important role in health emergencies and requires the promotion of active public communication to clear public confusion and misunderstanding [41]. Since the outbreak of the novel coronavirus, Sina Microblog, the main social media platform in China, has become increasingly important for the public to communicate about the COVID-19 epidemic. Therefore, it is of immediate importance for governments and nongovernmental organizations to study the public’s attention toward the COVID-19 epidemic on Sina Microblog. Sina Microblog (“Weibo” for short) is one of the most popular social media platforms in China and is the equivalent of Twitter in China. As of the fourth quarter of 2018, the number of monthly active users had reached 462 million, and approximately 200 million people are using Sina Microblog every day [42]. The Sina Microblog hot search list is the ranking of the most followed and hottest information on Sina Microblog, and is the most popular functional module in Sina Microblog apps [43,44]. This ranking is sorted according to the search volume of the hot topics that users searched for within a certain period. The higher the search volume is, the higher the ranking is, which directly reflects the public attention and attitude toward the topic. This paper studies the public attention given to COVID-19 on Sina Microblog by searching for and analyzing topics related to the COVID-19 epidemic on the Sina Microblog hot search list from December 31, 2019, to February 20, 2020. We use a Chinese social media platform, Sina Weibo, to study the public attention of COVID-19 [45]. In this study, we describe the trend of public attention given to topics related to the COVID-19 epidemic and the hot topic keywords of public concern, analyze the emotional tendencies and trends of hot topics related to the COVID-19 epidemic, and conduct a visual cluster analysis of the hot topic content. This approach is used to obtain timely access to public responses so that the government and the health department can better communicate with the public on health issues and take appropriate measures to prevent and control the epidemic [35,39].

Methods

Research Overview

The research process mainly included five steps: (1) collecting topics related to the COVID-19 epidemic on the Sina Microblog hot search list; (2) segmenting the collected text into words; (3) describing the Sina Microblog search trend around the COVID-19 epidemic; (4) evaluating public opinion through word frequency and sentiment analysis; and (5) constructing a social network of public opinion through the subject analysis of the content. Each step is described in detail below.

Data Collection

We obtained information on COVID-19 in mainland China from the National Health Committee of the People’s Republic of China [46]. The Wuhan Municipal Health Committee first reported viral pneumonia of unknown causes on December 31, 2019 [47]. This study collected topics on the Sina Microblog hot search list from December 31, 2019, to February 20, 2020, using Weibo Search Rank [48] from ENLIGHTENT [49], and selected topics and their search volume related to the COVID-19 epidemic. A total of 4056 topics related to the COVID-19 epidemic were on the hot search list, and 3234 remained after excluding duplicate topics. This group was used as the data basis for further processing, analysis, and discussion.

Data Processing

The topics related to the COVID-19 epidemic on the Sina Microblog hot search list from December 31, 2019, to February 20, 2020, were summarized and classified daily in chronological order. We used the Chinese word segmentation function in ROST Content Mining System Version 6.0 (ROST CM6.0) to segment the content of hot search topics on Sina Microblog into words [50]. After word segmentation, the text was processed by merging synonyms and deleting nonsense words to provide a basis for subsequent research.

Data Analysis

Trend Analysis

We plotted the number of topics related to the COVID-19 epidemic on the Sina Microblog hot search list and the cumulative search volume by date to explore the public’s attention toward the COVID-19 epidemic over time. A Pearson correlation analysis was used to explore the relationship between the number of hot search topics related to the COVID-19 epidemic and the cumulative search volume.

Word Frequency and Sentiment Analysis

After the Chinese word segmentation and invalid word filtering, we used ROST CM6.0 software to perform word frequency statistics and sentiment analysis on the Sina Microblog hot topics related to the COVID-19 epidemic. We calculated the frequency of keywords appearing in the hot search topics on Sina Microblog, explored the sentiment tendency of each hot search topic to the COVID-19 epidemic, and calculated the emotional score.

Social Network Analysis and Visualization

The high-frequency keywords and their frequencies were extracted from the Sina Microblog hot topic text after word segmentation and invalid word filtering. We used the VOSviewer software developed by Nees Jan van Eck and Ludo Waltman of the Centre for Science and Technology Studies of Leiden University in the Netherlands to create a visual knowledge map of keyword co-occurrence analysis and cluster analysis, using the keyword co-occurrence frequency as the weight [51].

Results

Search Trend of COVID-19 Epidemic on Sina Microblog Hot Search List

Figure 1 lists the number of COVID-19 epidemic-related topics and the cumulative search volume on the Sina Microblog hot search list from December 31, 2019, to February 20, 2020. The Pearson correlation analysis shows that the number of topics related to the COVID-19 epidemic is positively correlated with the cumulative search volume of the topic per day (r=0.767, P<.001). In other words, the more topics that are listed, the greater the cumulative search volume related to the COVID-19 epidemic per day. We can see that the public’s attention to the COVID-19 epidemic on Sina Microblog can be divided into three stages. Stage A (December 31, 2019, to January 18, 2020) has low and unstable public attention, which represents the incubation period. Stage B (January 19-26, 2020) has a concentrated increase in public attention, which represents the epidemic period. Stage C (January 27 to February 20, 2020) demonstrates continued public attention to the epidemic, representing a widespread period.
Figure 1

The number of topics and the cumulative search volume of the coronavirus disease epidemic on the Sina Microblog hot search list.

The number of topics and the cumulative search volume of the coronavirus disease epidemic on the Sina Microblog hot search list.

Frequency and Distribution of Hot Search Keywords Related to the COVID-19 Epidemic on Sina Microblog

The top 15 keywords and their frequencies for the three stages of the public’s attention to the COVID-19 epidemic are shown in Table 1. “Wuhan,” “case,” and “pneumonia” always appeared in the three periods as hot keywords, and the remaining keywords in the different periods were slightly different. In stage A, “unknown cause” and “novel coronavirus” were the main keywords, indicating that in the initial stage of the epidemic, viral pneumonia had just been discovered, and the cause was unknown. After the pathogen was initially identified as a novel coronavirus, the public began to search for information on the novel coronavirus to learn relevant knowledge. Compared with stage A, stage B had new keywords such as “new,” “mask,” “first case,” and “first-level response.” The reason for this is that the COVID-19 epidemic had spread across the country during this stage. The first cases had appeared successively throughout the country, and the number of confirmed cases was increasing. The outbreak of COVID-19 made the people and the government aware of the importance of prevention. People began to buy masks, and governments at all levels initiated first-level responses to major public health emergencies. Compared with the previous two stages, the main keywords appearing in stage C were “discharged,” “national,” “materials,” and “Huoshenshan Hospital.” At this stage, the public’s attention had shifted to material donation and medical service assistance in the key epidemic areas in Wuhan. Moreover, the epidemic had spread throughout the country, and the public was more concerned about the rehabilitation of patients.
Table 1

Top 15 keywords about the COVID-19 epidemic on the Sina Microblog hot search list in the three periods.

RankingStage A (Dec 31, 2019, to Jan 18, 2020)Stage B (Jan 19-26, 2020)Stage C (Jan 27 to Feb 20, 2020)
KeywordFrequency, nKeywordFrequency, nKeywordFrequency, n
1Wuhan17COVID-19a141Wuhan316
2Pneumonia14Wuhan124COVID-19283
3Unknown cause9Confirmed diagnosis87Case212
4Novel coronavirus6Case84Confirmed diagnosis212
5Patient5Add52Add199
6Case5Masks37Epidemic190
7Thailand4Epidemic31Hubei159
8Leave hospital2Hubei29Masks149
9Death2Startup25Patient149
10Person-to-person spread2First case22Hospital98
11Add2Pneumonia20Leave hospital90
12Japan2Beijing20Nationwide83
13COVID-192Patient19Beijing72
14Epidemic disease2First-level response18Goods and materials59
15Eliminate2Novel coronavirus17Huoshenshan hospital59

aCOVID-19: coronavirus disease.

Top 15 keywords about the COVID-19 epidemic on the Sina Microblog hot search list in the three periods. aCOVID-19: coronavirus disease.

Sentiment Analysis of the Hot Search Topics Related to the COVID-19 Epidemic on Sina Microblog

After segmentation, we imported the Sina Microblog hot topic text related to the COVID-19 epidemic into the ROST CM6.0 sentiment analysis tool and obtained the sentiment and proportion of the three stages of public attention given to the topics related to the COVID-19 epidemic (Figure 2). Emotions were classified as positive, negative, and neutral emotions. Based on this, positive and negative emotions were subdivided into three categories: general, moderate, and high. Neutral emotions were not subdivided. We found that the sentiment of the hot topics of the COVID-19 epidemic on Sina Microblog in stage A tended to be negative, accounting for 58% (n=14/24), of which high and moderate negative emotions accounted for 13% (n=3) and 17% (n=4), respectively, and positive emotions accounted for the lowest proportion at 8% (n=2). In stage B, the majority of the hot search topics were neutral; however, 27.2% (n=174/639) of the hot search topics showed negative emotions, with 0.3% (n=2) being highly negative and 3.6% (n=23) being moderately negative, while positive emotions accounted for 13.3% (n=85). In stage C, 18.01% (n=470/2610) of the hot search topics showed positive emotions, of which moderate positive emotions accounted for 2.26% (n=59) and highly positive emotions accounted for 0.31% (n=8); in addition, 28.24% (n=737) of the hot search topics showed negative emotions. Based on the comprehensive analysis of the three-stage emotional tendencies, the public’s negative emotions toward the COVID-19 epidemic were weakened as a whole, and their positive emotions were generally enhanced.
Figure 2

The sentiment statistics of the Sina Microblog hot search topics related to the coronavirus disease epidemic.

Figure 3 shows the trend for the proportion of the daily emotional tendencies of the hot search topics related to the COVID-19 epidemic from December 31, 2019, to February 20, 2020. We can see that the three kinds of emotions are relatively unstable before January 9, 2020. From January 9-20, 2020, negative emotions accounted for the largest proportion, followed by neutral emotions, and positive emotions accounted for the smallest proportion.
Figure 3

The sentiment trend of hot search topics related to the coronavirus disease epidemic from December 31, 2019, to February 20, 2020.

Compared with the emotions prior to January 20, 2020, the positive emotions of the hot search topics related to the COVID-19 epidemic after January 20, 2020, were generally on the rise; the negative emotions declined on the whole, and the emotions tended to be stable, as seen in Figure 3. This outcome shows that as the COVID-19 epidemic began to spread throughout the country after January 20, 2020, the public eased their concerns and fears caused by their uncertainty toward and ignorance of the epidemic, and responded to the epidemic with a more objective attitude. The sentiment statistics of the Sina Microblog hot search topics related to the coronavirus disease epidemic. The sentiment trend of hot search topics related to the coronavirus disease epidemic from December 31, 2019, to February 20, 2020.

Social Semantic Network Analysis of Hot Search Topics Related to the COVID-19 Epidemic on Sina Microblog

To explore the themes reflected by the related topics of the COVID-19 epidemic on the Sina Microblog hot search list, this study used VOSviewer to generate clusters and co-occurrence networks of topic keywords. The results are shown in Figure 4. In the figure, the larger the size of the nodes and the font, the greater the weight of the keyword is, and it is closer to the core position. The connection between the nodes indicates that the keywords on the two nodes have appeared together. The thicker the connection is, the higher the frequency of co-occurrence and the closer the connection is between the nodes. Nodes with the same color belong to the same cluster.
Figure 4

Social network of high-frequency keywords in the Sina Microblog hot search topics related to the COVID-19 epidemic.

According to the network visualization graph constructed in Figure 4, we can see that the keyword “COVID-19” is at the core node position, and the two nodes “Wuhan” and “add” are next. The core topic of public concern about the COVID-19 epidemic was COVID-19 itself, and the public was extremely concerned about the status of the epidemic in Wuhan and the new cases. We can divide the high-frequency keywords of topics into five clusters. Cluster 1 (red cluster) involved discussion related to new cases, the outbreak of COVID-19 across the country, and the impact of the epidemic on the resumption of school and work. Examples of keywords included “case,” “newly increased,” “appear,” “Hubei Province,” and “Beijing” (Figure 5).
Figure 5

Cluster 1.

Social network of high-frequency keywords in the Sina Microblog hot search topics related to the COVID-19 epidemic. Cluster 1. Cluster 2 (green cluster) involved searches for news reports on the frontline of the epidemic and related measures for prevention and control. Examples of keywords included “Wuhan,” “front-line,” “inpatient,” “quarantine,” and “living at home” (Figure 6).
Figure 6

Cluster 2.

Cluster 3 (blue cluster) involved searches for interpretations of the epidemic situation and prevention and control, and the knowledge of experts and relevant health departments, as well as the discussion on the source of the infection. The keywords in this cluster included “academician,” “WHO,” “face mask,” “epidemic prevention,” “symptom,” “virus,” and “SARS-CoV-2” (Figure 7).
Figure 7

Cluster 3.

Cluster 4 (yellow cluster) included searches for frontline medical services such as frontline hospital construction and medical team support. Examples of keywords in this cluster included “patient,” “hospital,” “Leishenshan,” “Huoshenshan,” and “first batch” (Figure 8).
Figure 8

Cluster 4.

Cluster 5 (purple cluster) included searches for the worldwide spread of the disease and searching online for fellow passengers with confirmed cases. Examples of keywords in this cluster included “passenger,” “carriage,” “cruise,” “suspend,” “infection,” and “Japan” (Figure 9).
Figure 9

Cluster 5.

Cluster 2. Cluster 3. Cluster 4. Cluster 5.

Discussion

Principal Results

In recent years, as people increasingly seek health information online, social media has played an increasingly important role in public health emergencies [29,35]. However, there have been no relevant studies that have incorporated social media analysis into the public response to the COVID-19 epidemic. We used the Sina Microblog hot search list to analyze the public’s attention toward the COVID-19 epidemic from December 31, 2019, to February 20, 2020, which was 52 days after the first disclosure of COVID-19 by the Chinese health department. There were four main findings from this study. First, we analyzed the changing trend of public attention given to the COVID-19 epidemic, which can be divided into three stages. Second, the hot topic keywords of the public’s attention at each stage were slightly different. Third, the public’s emotional tendency toward the hot search topics related to the COVID-19 epidemic changed from negative to neutral across the study period. As a whole, negative emotions weakened, and positive emotions increased. Fourth, we divided the topics of public concern about the COVID-19 epidemic into five categories through social semantic network analysis. This study analyzes the public’s response and attention given to the COVID-19 epidemic, which will help public health professionals monitor public response, identify public needs as early as possible, make timely public health prevention and control measures, and disseminate knowledge to citizens in a targeted manner to better respond to the current COVID-19 epidemic. From December 31, 2019, to February 20, 2020, the public attention given to the COVID-19 epidemic on Sina Microblog can be divided into three stages. In the beginning, there was little public attention paid to the epidemic, and then the concentration of attention increased. Next, the public attention given to the epidemic generally declined, but people continued to pay attention. In the first stage (December 31, 2019, to January 18, 2020), the Chinese public paid less attention, as COVID-19 was only reported in Wuhan, China. On January 19, 2020, suspected cases appeared in Shanghai and Shenzhen, and body temperatures began to be measured at the Wuhan Airport and Railway Station. People began to notice the severity of the epidemic, and the level of attention paid to the COVID-19 epidemic began to increase until January 26, 2020. We can see that when the epidemic began to spread across the country, the public responded quickly to news about the COVID-19 outbreak on Sina Microblog [39]. This is because COVID-19 is a new infectious disease, which means that no effective treatment has been found and no corresponding vaccine has been developed. When the outbreak began, the public was eager to search for relevant knowledge and information online to meet their own protection needs [27,30]. In the third stage (January 27 to February 20, 2020), although the number of cases of COVID-19 were still increasing, the number of Sina Microblog topics and their search volume were decreasing. The reason for this may be because the epidemic information was relatively saturated, and it was difficult for people to acquire more new knowledge through a Sina Microblog search [27]. It may also be that people were no longer paying close attention to the epidemic dynamic to gain a sense of security as time went on, and the public’s consciousness tends to be rational [52]. The keywords for the three different stages of the public’s attention to the COVID-19 epidemic were slightly different. From the hot search keywords of each stage, we found that the public did not know much about the virus and its causes in the first stage. The main keywords of the search to seek relevant knowledge were “unknown cause” and “novel coronavirus.” During the second stage, the epidemic began to spread throughout the country, the first cases were reported in different areas successively, and the number of confirmed cases continued to increase, thereby making the public and government aware of the importance of prevention. During the third stage, the epidemic spread widely throughout the country; Wuhan was the most seriously affected area, and the city was locked down. The public’s attention was mainly shifted to material donation and medical assistance in Wuhan. Compared with qualitative research, it is more accurate to obtain the hot spots of public attention through keyword frequency analysis, as this process has a higher accuracy and more credibility in the research of hot spots and their development trends [40]. Based on our high-frequency keyword analysis of the Sina Microblog topics related to the COVID-19 epidemic, we can obtain information about the concerns and opinions of Sina Microblog users at different stages [53]. Studies have found that people’s interest in infectious diseases on social media was linked to the latest news and major events. Studies have also shown that people will pay attention to and search for disease-related words as the spread of infectious diseases change [30]. According to the sentiment tendencies of the hot search topics related to the COVID-19 epidemic on Sina Microblog, the first stage of emotion was negative, and the second and third stages were neutral. On the whole, negative emotions weakened, and positive emotions increased. Previous studies have pointed out that there is also an important relationship between emotions and content on social media [54]. The content analysis of social networks has identified people’s attitudes or reactions to specific health hazard events [30,39]. In the first stage, there was less public attention given to the Sina Microblog hot search list. Most of the topics related to the COVID-19 epidemic were about the notification of pneumonia and the virus, and the emotions tended to be negative. At that time, the public had a strong demand for information on public health emergencies such as infectious diseases. When the information demand could not be fully satisfied, the users’ emotions were negative [40]. As the epidemic progressed to the second and third stages, the public sentiment tended to be neutral because increasingly more news was being reported at this stage, and objective events became the mainstream information on the Sina Microblog hot search list. The public reduced their previous levels of worries and fears about the epidemic; their negative feelings weakened, and their positive emotions increased. More hot search topics mentioned information about prevention or protection, which is conducive to public health communication and promotion. We divided the COVID-19 topics with the highest levels of public concern into five categories: the situation of new cases of COVID-19 and its impact, frontline reporting of the epidemic and the measures of prevention and control, expert interpretation and discussion on the source of infection, medical services on the frontline of the epidemic, and focus on the worldwide epidemic and looking for suspected cases. From the search of the subject content, we can see that during the outbreak of the novel coronavirus, the public, the news media, and the health department all actively used Sina Microblog as a platform for disseminating information related to COVID-19 [29], indicating that Sina Microblog is a communication channel for both individuals and organizations to publicize COVID-19 symptoms, preventive measures, and related policies [37]. In addition, as a real time and extensive online platform, Sina Microblog provides a channel for information dissemination. For example, in this emergency outbreak, the public has made good use of the platform to find fellow passengers with confirmed cases, thereby playing an important role in preventing and controlling the disease transmission.

Limitations

There are some limitations to this study. First, our study was limited to the period 52 days after COVID-19 was first disclosed by the Chinese health department. Thus, the situation after February 20, 2020, was not included in this study. Second, we only used Sina Microblog as the social media platform in this study, the data source for this study is relatively narrow. Considering that China is seriously aging and that the majority of internet users are young people, the age of Sina Microblog users is mainly concentrated in those 18-41 years [42], which cannot represent the population of all ages in China. Therefore, selection bias is inevitable in this study. On the other hand, the study excludes other popular social media data sources such as WeChat and ByteDance and is limited to the publicly available data on the Sina Microblog hot search list. Moreover, due to the lack of detailed information about the users who contributed to the search volume of the Sina Microblog hot search list, we could not describe the social demographic information of the Sina Microblog users, and we failed to obtain the geospatial distribution of Sina Microblog active users. Thus, we could not calculate the average attention of the public in different regions of China.

Future Work

Social media has played a vital role during the spread of the COVID-19 epidemic and has become the main way for the public to obtain epidemic information. However, the excessive amount of information about the novel coronavirus (some right, some wrong) on social media may make it difficult for people to find reliable sources and guidance when needed, and may even be harmful to people’s health, leading to the outbreak of an infodemic [55]. Therefore, misinformation can be easily propagated and spread on social media. Apart from traditional “top-down” public health communication, provider-managed communication platforms such as WebMD (America), AskDr (Singapore), and HaoDF (China) can be used as an additional countermeasure available to develop a ground-up response to this issue. HaoDF [56], one of the largest doctor-patient communication platforms in China, launched an online free consultation service for COVID-19 during this epidemic. Doctors answered questions online for free 24 hours a day to help the public make a preliminary judgment about the disease and avoid blind medical treatment caused by panic. In addition, HaoDF summarized the common questions and answers of COVID-19 to let the public know more about the epidemic. These are the forms of responses, as potential solutions to avoid an infodemic, that governments can engage with, researchers can study, and innovators can develop in the future.

Conclusions

Our study found that social media platforms such as Sina Microblog can be used to measure public attention given to public health emergencies. Our study shows that a large amount of information about the COVID-19 epidemic was disseminated and received widespread public attention on Sina Microblog during the novel coronavirus epidemic. We have learned about the hotspots of public concern regarding the COVID-19 epidemic on Sina Microblog. These findings can help the government and health departments better communicate with the public about public health and then translate public health needs into practice to create targeted measures to prevent and control the spread of COVID-19.
  31 in total

Review 1.  Public sentiment and discourse about Zika virus on Instagram.

Authors:  E K Seltzer; E Horst-Martz; M Lu; R M Merchant
Journal:  Public Health       Date:  2017-08-12       Impact factor: 2.427

2.  Geospatial Distribution of Local Health Department Tweets and Online Searches About Ebola During the 2014 Ebola Outbreak.

Authors:  Roger Wong; Jenine K Harris
Journal:  Disaster Med Public Health Prep       Date:  2017-08-24       Impact factor: 1.385

3.  Quantifying Network Dynamics and Information Flow Across Chinese Social Media During the African Ebola Outbreak.

Authors:  Shihui Feng; Liaquat Hossain; John W Crawford; Terry Bossomaier
Journal:  Disaster Med Public Health Prep       Date:  2017-08-01       Impact factor: 1.385

4.  Communicating Ebola through social media and electronic news media outlets: A cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Mowafa Househ
Journal:  Health Informatics J       Date:  2015-02-05       Impact factor: 2.681

5.  Chinese social media reaction to the MERS-CoV and avian influenza A(H7N9) outbreaks.

Authors:  Isaac Chun-Hai Fung; King-Wa Fu; Yuchen Ying; Braydon Schaible; Yi Hao; Chung-Hong Chan; Zion Tsz-Ho Tse
Journal:  Infect Dis Poverty       Date:  2013-12-20       Impact factor: 4.520

6.  Clinical findings in a group of patients infected with the 2019 novel coronavirus (SARS-Cov-2) outside of Wuhan, China: retrospective case series.

Authors:  Xiao-Wei Xu; Xiao-Xin Wu; Xian-Gao Jiang; Kai-Jin Xu; Ling-Jun Ying; Chun-Lian Ma; Shi-Bo Li; Hua-Ying Wang; Sheng Zhang; Hai-Nv Gao; Ji-Fang Sheng; Hong-Liu Cai; Yun-Qing Qiu; Lan-Juan Li
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2020-02-19

7.  Early epidemiological analysis of the coronavirus disease 2019 outbreak based on crowdsourced data: a population-level observational study.

Authors:  Kaiyuan Sun; Jenny Chen; Cécile Viboud
Journal:  Lancet Digit Health       Date:  2020-02-20

8.  How to fight an infodemic.

Authors:  John Zarocostas
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2020-02-29       Impact factor: 79.321

9.  First imported case of 2019 novel coronavirus in Canada, presenting as mild pneumonia.

Authors:  William Kyle Silverstein; Lynfa Stroud; Graham Edward Cleghorn; Jerome Allen Leis
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2020-02-13       Impact factor: 79.321

10.  Cancer patients in SARS-CoV-2 infection: a nationwide analysis in China.

Authors:  Wenhua Liang; Weijie Guan; Ruchong Chen; Wei Wang; Jianfu Li; Ke Xu; Caichen Li; Qing Ai; Weixiang Lu; Hengrui Liang; Shiyue Li; Jianxing He
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2020-02-14       Impact factor: 41.316

View more
  66 in total

Review 1.  Impact of Social Media and Virtual Learning on Cardiology During the COVID-19 Pandemic Era and Beyond.

Authors:  Alpana Senapati; Najah Khan; L Bindu Chebrolu
Journal:  Methodist Debakey Cardiovasc J       Date:  2020 Jul-Sep

2.  Microblog data analysis of emotional reactions to COVID-19 in China.

Authors:  Yuchang Jin; Aoxue Yan; Tengwei Sun; Peixuan Zheng; Junxiu An
Journal:  J Psychosom Res       Date:  2022-06-30       Impact factor: 4.620

3.  Social Network Analysis of COVID-19 Sentiments: 10 Metropolitan Cities in Italy.

Authors:  Gabriela Fernandez; Carol Maione; Harrison Yang; Karenina Zaballa; Norbert Bonnici; Jarai Carter; Brian H Spitzberg; Chanwoo Jin; Ming-Hsiang Tsou
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-06-23       Impact factor: 4.614

4.  Exploring the Relationship among Human Activities, COVID-19 Morbidity, and At-Risk Areas Using Location-Based Social Media Data: Knowledge about the Early Pandemic Stage in Wuhan.

Authors:  Mengyue Yuan; Tong Liu; Chao Yang
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-05-27       Impact factor: 4.614

5.  The deployment of social media by political authorities and health experts to enhance public information during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Authors:  Maud Reveilhac
Journal:  SSM Popul Health       Date:  2022-07-08

6.  Well-Being Reduces COVID-19 Anxiety: A Three-Wave Longitudinal Study in China.

Authors:  Zhuojun Wang; Shuyi Luo; Jianjie Xu; Yanwei Wang; Hanqi Yun; Zihao Zhao; Haocheng Zhan; Yinan Wang
Journal:  J Happiness Stud       Date:  2021-03-27

7.  Social Media Insights During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Infodemiology Study Using Big Data.

Authors:  Huyen Thi Thanh Tran; Shih-Hao Lu; Ha Thi Thu Tran; Bien Van Nguyen
Journal:  JMIR Med Inform       Date:  2021-07-16

8.  A multi-country test of brief reappraisal interventions on emotions during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Authors:  Ke Wang; Amit Goldenberg; Charles A Dorison; Jeremy K Miller; Andero Uusberg; Jennifer S Lerner; James J Gross; Bamikole Bamikole Agesin; Márcia Bernardo; Olatz Campos; Luis Eudave; Karolina Grzech; Daphna Hausman Ozery; Emily A Jackson; Elkin Oswaldo Luis Garcia; Shira Meir Drexler; Anita Penić Jurković; Kafeel Rana; John Paul Wilson; Maria Antoniadi; Kermeka Desai; Zoi Gialitaki; Elizaveta Kushnir; Khaoula Nadif; Olalla Niño Bravo; Rafia Nauman; Marlies Oosterlinck; Myrto Pantazi; Natalia Pilecka; Anna Szabelska; I M M van Steenkiste; Katarzyna Filip; Andreea Ioana Bozdoc; Gabriela Mariana Marcu; Elena Agadullina; Matúš Adamkovič; Marta Roczniewska; Cecilia Reyna; Angelos P Kassianos; Minja Westerlund; Lina Ahlgren; Sara Pöntinen; Gabriel Agboola Adetula; Pinar Dursun; Azuka Ikechukwu Arinze; Nwadiogo Chisom Arinze; Chisom Esther Ogbonnaya; Izuchukwu L G Ndukaihe; Ilker Dalgar; Handan Akkas; Paulo Manuel Macapagal; Savannah Lewis; Irem Metin-Orta; Francesco Foroni; Megan Willis; Anabela Caetano Santos; Aviv Mokady; Niv Reggev; Merve A Kurfali; Martin R Vasilev; Nora L Nock; Michal Parzuchowski; Mauricio F Espinoza Barría; Marek Vranka; Markéta Braun Kohlová; Ivan Ropovik; Mikayel Harutyunyan; Chunhui Wang; Elvin Yao; Maja Becker; Efisio Manunta; Gwenael Kaminski; Jordane Boudesseu; Dafne Marko; Kortnee Evans; David M G Lewis; Andrej Findor; Anais Thibault Landry; John Jamir Benzon Aruta; Manuel S Ortiz; Zahir Vally; Ekaterina Pronizius; Martin Voracek; Claus Lamm; Maurice Grinberg; Ranran Li; Jaroslava Varella Valentova; Giovanna Mioni; Nicola Cellini; Sau-Chin Chen; Janis Zickfeld; Karis Moon; Habiba Azab; Neil Levy; Alper Karababa; Jennifer L Beaudry; Leanne Boucher; W Matthew Collins; Anna Louise Todsen; Kevin van Schie; Jáchym Vintr; Jozef Bavolar; Lada Kaliska; Valerija Križanić; Lara Samojlenko; Razieh Pourafshari; Sandra J Geiger; Julia Beitner; Lara Warmelink; Robert M Ross; Ian D Stephen; Thomas J Hostler; Soufian Azouaghe; Randy McCarthy; Anna Szala; Caterina Grano; Claudio Singh Solorzano; Gulnaz Anjum; William Jimenez-Leal; Maria Bradford; Laura Calderón Pérez; Julio E Cruz Vásquez; Oscar J Galindo-Caballero; Juan Camilo Vargas-Nieto; Ondřej Kácha; Alexios Arvanitis; Qinyu Xiao; Rodrigo Cárcamo; Saša Zorjan; Zuzanna Tajchman; Iris Vilares; Jeffrey M Pavlacic; Jonas R Kunst; Christian K Tamnes; Claudia C von Bastian; Mohammad Atari; MohammadHasan Sharifian; Monika Hricova; Pavol Kačmár; Jana Schrötter; Rima-Maria Rahal; Noga Cohen; Saeideh FatahModares; Miha Zrimsek; Ilya Zakharov; Monica A Koehn; Celia Esteban-Serna; Robert J Calin-Jageman; Anthony J Krafnick; Eva Štrukelj; Peder Mortvedt Isager; Jan Urban; Jaime R Silva; Marcel Martončik; Sanja Batić Očovaj; Dušana Šakan; Anna O Kuzminska; Jasna Milosevic Djordjevic; Inês A T Almeida; Ana Ferreira; Ljiljana B Lazarevic; Harry Manley; Danilo Zambrano Ricaurte; Renan P Monteiro; Zahra Etabari; Erica Musser; Daniel Dunleavy; Weilun Chou; Hendrik Godbersen; Susana Ruiz-Fernández; Crystal Reeck; Carlota Batres; Komila Kirgizova; Abdumalik Muminov; Flavio Azevedo; Daniela Serrato Alvarez; Muhammad Mussaffa Butt; Jeong Min Lee; Zhang Chen; Frederick Verbruggen; Ignazio Ziano; Murat Tümer; Abdelilah C A Charyate; Dmitrii Dubrov; María Del Carmen M C Tejada Rivera; Christopher Aberson; Bence Pálfi; Mónica Alarcón Maldonado; Barbora Hubena; Asli Sacakli; Chris D Ceary; Karley L Richard; Gage Singer; Jennifer T Perillo; Tonia Ballantyne; Wilson Cyrus-Lai; Maksim Fedotov; Hongfei Du; Magdalena Wielgus; Ilse L Pit; Matej Hruška; Daniela Sousa; Balazs Aczel; Nandor Hajdu; Barnabas Szaszi; Sylwia Adamus; Krystian Barzykowski; Leticia Micheli; Nadya-Daniela Schmidt; Andras N Zsido; Mariola Paruzel-Czachura; Rafał Muda; Michal Bialek; Marta Kowal; Agnieszka Sorokowska; Michal Misiak; Débora Mola; María Victoria Ortiz; Pablo Sebastián Correa; Anabel Belaus; Fany Muchembled; Rafael R Ribeiro; Patricia Arriaga; Raquel Oliveira; Leigh Ann Vaughn; Paulina Szwed; Małgorzata Kossowska; Gabriela Czarnek; Julita Kielińska; Benedict Antazo; Ruben Betlehem; Stefan Stieger; Gustav Nilsonne; Nicolle Simonovic; Jennifer Taber; Amélie Gourdon-Kanhukamwe; Artur Domurat; Keiko Ihaya; Yuki Yamada; Anum Urooj; Tripat Gill; Martin Čadek; Lisa Bylinina; Johanna Messerschmidt; Murathan Kurfalı; Adeyemi Adetula; Ekaterina Baklanova; Nihan Albayrak-Aydemir; Heather B Kappes; Biljana Gjoneska; Thea House; Marc V Jones; Jana B Berkessel; William J Chopik; Sami Çoksan; Martin Seehuus; Ahmed Khaoudi; Ahmed Bokkour; Kanza Ait El Arabi; Ikhlas Djamai; Aishwarya Iyer; Neha Parashar; Arca Adiguzel; Halil Emre Kocalar; Carsten Bundt; James O Norton; Marietta Papadatou-Pastou; Anabel De la Rosa-Gomez; Vladislav Ankushev; Natalia Bogatyreva; Dmitry Grigoryev; Aleksandr Ivanov; Irina Prusova; Marina Romanova; Irena Sarieva; Maria Terskova; Evgeniya Hristova; Veselina Hristova Kadreva; Allison Janak; Vidar Schei; Therese E Sverdrup; Adrian Dahl Askelund; Lina Maria Sanabria Pineda; Dajana Krupić; Carmel A Levitan; Niklas Johannes; Nihal Ouherrou; Nicolas Say; Sladjana Sinkolova; Kristina Janjić; Marija Stojanovska; Dragana Stojanovska; Meetu Khosla; Andrew G Thomas; Franki Y H Kung; Gijsbert Bijlstra; Farnaz Mosannenzadeh; Busra Bahar Balci; Ulf-Dietrich Reips; Ernest Baskin; Byurakn Ishkhanyan; Johanna Czamanski-Cohen; Barnaby James Wyld Dixson; David Moreau; Clare A M Sutherland; Hu Chuan-Peng; Chris Noone; Heather Flowe; Michele Anne; Steve M J Janssen; Marta Topor; Nadyanna M Majeed; Yoshihiko Kunisato; Karen Yu; Shimrit Daches; Andree Hartanto; Milica Vdovic; Lisa Anton-Boicuk; Paul A G Forbes; Julia Kamburidis; Evelina Marinova; Mina Nedelcheva-Datsova; Nikolay R Rachev; Alina Stoyanova; Kathleen Schmidt; Jordan W Suchow; Maria Koptjevskaja-Tamm; Teodor Jernsäther; Jonas K Olofsson; Olga Bialobrzeska; Magdalena Marszalek; Srinivasan Tatachari; Reza Afhami; Wilbert Law; Jan Antfolk; Barbara Žuro; Natalia Van Doren; Jose A Soto; Rachel Searston; Jacob Miranda; Kaja Damnjanović; Siu Kit Yeung; Dino Krupić; Karlijn Hoyer; Bastian Jaeger; Dongning Ren; Gerit Pfuhl; Kristoffer Klevjer; Nadia S Corral-Frías; Martha Frias-Armenta; Marc Y Lucas; Adriana Olaya Torres; Mónica Toro; Lady Grey Javela Delgado; Diego Vega; Sara Álvarez Solas; Roosevelt Vilar; Sébastien Massoni; Thomas Frizzo; Alexandre Bran; David C Vaidis; Luc Vieira; Bastien Paris; Mariagrazia Capizzi; Gabriel Lins de Holanda Coelho; Anna Greenburgh; Cassie M Whitt; Alexa M Tullett; Xinkai Du; Leonhard Volz; Minke Jasmijn Bosma; Cemre Karaarslan; Eylül Sarıoğuz; Tara Bulut Allred; Max Korbmacher; Melissa F Colloff; Tiago J S Lima; Matheus Fernando Felix Ribeiro; Jeroen P H Verharen; Maria Karekla; Christiana Karashiali; Naoyuki Sunami; Lisa M Jaremka; Daniel Storage; Sumaiya Habib; Anna Studzinska; Paul H P Hanel; Dawn Liu Holford; Miroslav Sirota; Kelly Wolfe; Faith Chiu; Andriana Theodoropoulou; El Rim Ahn; Yijun Lin; Erin C Westgate; Hilmar Brohmer; Gabriela Hofer; Olivier Dujols; Kevin Vezirian; Gilad Feldman; Giovanni A Travaglino; Afroja Ahmed; Manyu Li; Jasmijn Bosch; Nathan Torunsky; Hui Bai; Mathi Manavalan; Xin Song; Radoslaw B Walczak; Przemysław Zdybek; Maja Friedemann; Anna Dalla Rosa; Luca Kozma; Sara G Alves; Samuel Lins; Isabel R Pinto; Rita C Correia; Peter Babinčák; Gabriel Banik; Luis Miguel Rojas-Berscia; Marco A C Varella; Jim Uttley; Julie E Beshears; Katrine Krabbe Thommesen; Behzad Behzadnia; Shawn N Geniole; Miguel A Silan; Princess Lovella G Maturan; Johannes K Vilsmeier; Ulrich S Tran; Sara Morales Izquierdo; Michael C Mensink; Piotr Sorokowski; Agata Groyecka-Bernard; Theda Radtke; Vera Cubela Adoric; Joelle Carpentier; Asil Ali Özdoğru; Jennifer A Joy-Gaba; Mattie V Hedgebeth; Tatsunori Ishii; Aaron L Wichman; Jan Philipp Röer; Thomas Ostermann; William E Davis; Lilian Suter; Konstantinos Papachristopoulos; Chelsea Zabel; Sandersan Onie; Charles R Ebersole; Christopher R Chartier; Peter R Mallik; Heather L Urry; Erin M Buchanan; Nicholas A Coles; Maximilian A Primbs; Dana M Basnight-Brown; Hans IJzerman; Patrick S Forscher; Hannah Moshontz
Journal:  Nat Hum Behav       Date:  2021-08-02

9.  Capturing the Interplay between Risk Perception and Social Media Posting to Support Risk Response and Decision Making.

Authors:  Huiyun Zhu; Kecheng Liu
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-05-14       Impact factor: 3.390

10.  Latent Profiles and Influencing Factors of Posttraumatic Stress Symptoms Among Adults During the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Authors:  Wenjie Duan; Qiujie Guan; Qiuping Jin
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2021-06-24
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.