Literature DB >> 27566874

How people react to Zika virus outbreaks on Twitter? A computational content analysis.

King-Wa Fu1, Hai Liang1, Nitin Saroha2, Zion Tsz Ho Tse3, Patrick Ip4, Isaac Chun-Hai Fung5.   

Abstract

Zika-related Twitter incidence peaked after the World Health Organization declared an emergency. Five themes were identified from Zika-related Twitter content: (1) societal impact of the outbreak; (2) government, public and private sector, and general public responses to the outbreak; (3) pregnancy and microcephaly: negative health consequences related to pregnant women and babies; (4) transmission routes; and (5) case reports. User-generated contents sites were preferred direct information channels rather than those of the government authorities. Copyright Â
© 2016 Association for Professionals in Infection Control and Epidemiology, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Health communication; Zika virus disease; pregnancy complications; public response; social media

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27566874     DOI: 10.1016/j.ajic.2016.04.253

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Infect Control        ISSN: 0196-6553            Impact factor:   2.918


  36 in total

1.  Engaging Community and Faith-Based Organizations in the Zika Response, United States, 2016.

Authors:  Scott Santibañez; Jonathan Lynch; Y Peter Paye; Haley McCalla; Joanna Gaines; Kimberly Konkel; Luis J Ocasio Torres; Wayne A North; Anna Likos; Katherine Lyon Daniel
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  2017-06-06       Impact factor: 2.792

2.  Twitter Conversations and English News Media Reports on Poliomyelitis in Five Different Countries, January 2014 to April 2015.

Authors:  Braydon J Schaible; Kassandra R Snook; Jingjing Yin; Ashley M Jackson; Jennifer O Ahweyevu; Muhling Chong; Zion Tsz Ho Tse; Hai Liang; King-Wa Fu; Isaac Chun-Hai Fung
Journal:  Perm J       Date:  2019-07-08

3.  Microblog data analysis of emotional reactions to COVID-19 in China.

Authors:  Yuchang Jin; Aoxue Yan; Tengwei Sun; Peixuan Zheng; Junxiu An
Journal:  J Psychosom Res       Date:  2022-06-30       Impact factor: 4.620

4.  The Utility of Social Media in Providing Information on Zika Virus.

Authors:  Neeraja Chandrasekaran; Kimberly Gressick; Vivek Singh; Jaclyn Kwal; Natalia Cap; Tulay Koru-Sengul; Christine L Curry
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2017-10-23

5.  Global reaction to the recent outbreaks of Zika virus: Insights from a Big Data analysis.

Authors:  Nicola Luigi Bragazzi; Cristiano Alicino; Cecilia Trucchi; Chiara Paganino; Ilaria Barberis; Mariano Martini; Laura Sticchi; Eugen Trinka; Francesco Brigo; Filippo Ansaldi; Giancarlo Icardi; Andrea Orsi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-09-21       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Local chatter or international buzz? Language differences on posts about Zika research on Twitter and Facebook.

Authors:  Germana Barata; Kenneth Shores; Juan Pablo Alperin
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-01-05       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  What Are People Tweeting About Zika? An Exploratory Study Concerning Its Symptoms, Treatment, Transmission, and Prevention.

Authors:  Michele Miller; Tanvi Banerjee; Roopteja Muppalla; William Romine; Amit Sheth
Journal:  JMIR Public Health Surveill       Date:  2017-06-19

8.  Zika Virus on YouTube: An Analysis of English-language Video Content by Source.

Authors:  Corey H Basch; Isaac Chun-Hai Fung; Rodney N Hammond; Elizabeth B Blankenship; Zion Tsz Ho Tse; King-Wa Fu; Patrick Ip; Charles E Basch
Journal:  J Prev Med Public Health       Date:  2017-01-26

9.  Public Discussion of Anthrax on Twitter: Using Machine Learning to Identify Relevant Topics and Events.

Authors:  Michele Miller; William Romine; Terry Oroszi
Journal:  JMIR Public Health Surveill       Date:  2021-06-18

10.  Early detection of perceived risk among users of a UK travel health website compared with internet search activity and media coverage during the 2015-2016 Zika virus outbreak: an observational study.

Authors:  Jakob Petersen; Hilary Simons; Dipti Patel; Joanne Freedman
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2017-08-31       Impact factor: 2.692

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.