| Literature DB >> 35998408 |
Yuchang Jin1, Aoxue Yan1, Tengwei Sun1, Peixuan Zheng2, Junxiu An3.
Abstract
To explore the emotional attitudes of microblog users in the different COVID-19 stages in China, this study used data mining and machine-learning methods to crawl 112,537 Sina COVID-19- related microblogs and conduct sentiment and group difference analyses. It was found that: (1) the microblog users' emotions shifted from negative to positive from the second COVID-19 pandemic phase; (2) there were no significant differences in the microblog users' emotions in the different regions; (3) males were more optimistic than females in the early stages of the pandemic; however, females were more optimistic than males in the last three stages; and (4) females posted more microblogs and expressed more sadness and fear while males expressed more anger and disgust. This research captured online information in real-time, with the results providing a reference for future research into public opinion and emotional reactions to crises.Entities:
Keywords: Basic emotions; COVID-19; Data mining; Sentiment analysis technology; Sina microblogs
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35998408 PMCID: PMC9245366 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2022.110976
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Psychosom Res ISSN: 0022-3999 Impact factor: 4.620
Fig. 1Research flow chart.
The format of microblog data related to “novel coronavirus”.
| Posters' nickname | Sex | Region | Microblog content | Posting time |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Niushen | Male | Beijing | I'm at such a risk and anxious when novel coronavirus... | 20/1/30 12:10 |
| Gengua | Female | Mianyang | Medical incidents are rampant.... | 20/1/30 12:11 |
| Boshu biology | Male | Jiangsu | #Novel coronavirus diagnosis#1342 cases were confirmed... | 20/1/30 12:11 |
| ... | ... | ... | ... | ... |
Parameters of Ernie model.
| Parameters | Values |
|---|---|
| initializer_range | 0.02 |
| Learning_rate | 0.00002 |
| vocab_size | 18,000 |
| Epoch | 20 |
| hidden_dropout_prob | 0.1 |
| attention_probs_dropout_prob | 0.1 |
Training results of various models.
| Method | Pr (%) | Re (%) | F1 (%) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ernie | 83.9 | 83.9 | 83.9 |
| Albert | 80.9 | 79.16 | 68.72 |
| Bert | 83.5 | 83.5 | 83.5 |
Fig. 2Cloud maps of keywords in each stage of epidemic situation.
Fig. 3Proportion of bipolar emotions——time evolution.
Fig. 4Proportion of multiple emotions——time evolution diagram.
Analysis of gender * expression tendency (number of bloggers).
| Stage | Sex | Number | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Male | Female | ||
| Stage1 | 5243 | 6300 | 11,543 |
| Stage2 | 14,439 | 15,283 | 29,722 |
| Stage3 | 8974 | 9304 | 18,278 |
| Stage4 | 14,416 | 18,082 | 32,498 |
| Stage5 | 9311 | 11,186 | 20,496 |
Different emotions of microblogs.
| Stage | Fear | Sad | Happy | Disgust | Surprise | Fear | Positive value | Negative value | FLAG value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Stage1 | 1222 | 812 | 4338 | 863 | 2343 | 1965 | 0.4769 | 0.5502 | 0.912 |
| 10.60% | 7% | 37.60% | 7.50% | 21% | 17% | ||||
| Stage2 | 3763 | 1841 | 16,128 | 1127 | 3110 | 3754 | 0.6548 | 0.3747 | 1.304 |
| 12.70% | 6.20% | 54.20% | 3.80% | 10.50% | 12.60% | ||||
| Stage3 | 2145 | 814 | 8139 | 2092 | 2776 | 2312 | 0.651 | 0.3851 | 1.298 |
| 11.70% | 4.50% | 44.50% | 11.40% | 15.20% | 12.60% | N = 11,867 | |||
| Stage4 | 3518 | 1794 | 14,028 | 4871 | 4927 | 3360 | 0.6487 | 0.3856 | 1.292 |
| 10.80% | 5.50% | 43.20% | 15% | 15.20% | 10.30% | N = 20,988 | N = 11,510 | ||
| Stage5 | 2220 | 1076 | 8774 | 3606 | 3120 | 1701 | 0.6476 | 0.3857 | 1.279 |
| 10.80% | 5.20% | 42.80% | 17.60% | 15.20% | 8.30% |
Difference analysis of gender * different emotional tendencies (2 categories).
| Positive value | Negative value | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Male | Female | t value | Male | Female | t value | |||
| Stage1 | 0.488 | 0.467 | 2.601 | 0.127 | 0.548 | 0.552 | −0.624 | 0.024* |
| Stage2 | 0.670 | 0.640 | 6.062 | *** | 0.376 | 0.372 | 0.595 | 0.827 |
| Stage3 | 0.646 | 0.665 | −3.408 | 0.049* | 0.488 | 0.412 | 6.602 | *** |
| Stage4 | 0.629 | 0.675 | −0.980 | *** | 0.417 | 0.344 | 14.249 | *** |
| Stage5 | 0.623 | 0.675 | −8.317 | *** | 0.418 | 0.347 | 11.738 | *** |
Note: *p < 0.05 、**p < 0.01、***p < 0.001.
Difference analysis of gender * different emotional tendencies (6 categories).
| Stage 1 | Stage 2 | Stage 3 | Stage 4 | Stage 5 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Male | Female | Male | Female | Male | Female | Male | Female | Male | Female | |||||||||||
| Angry | 622a | 600b | 310.80 | *** | 1812a | 1951a | 455.32 | *** | 1346a | 799a | 307.40 | *** | 2077a | 1411b | 886.21 | *** | 1302a | 918b | 670.2 | *** |
| Sad | 230a | 582b | 633a | 1208b | 395a | 419b | 785a | 1009b | 414a | 662b | ||||||||||
| Happy | 1950a | 2388a | 8013a | 8115b | 4669a | 3470b | 7055a | 6973b | 4171a | 4603b | ||||||||||
| Disgust | 423a | 440b | 596a | 531b | 1548a | 544b | 3488a | 1383b | 2500a | 1106b | ||||||||||
| Surprise | 1323a | 1020b | 1884a | 1226b | 1886a | 890b | 3098a | 1829b | 1898a | 1222b | ||||||||||
| Fear | 695a | 1270b | 1501a | 2253b | 1460a | 852a | 1913a | 1447a | 901a | 800a | ||||||||||
Note: *p < 0.05 、**p < 0.01、***p < 0.001.
Each subscript letter indicates a subset of group categories whose column proportions do not differ significantly from each other at the. 05 level.
Difference analysis of regions * emotional tendency.
| regions | N | Flag value | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Stage 1 | Wuhan City | 1165 | 0.89 | −0.264 (ρ = 0.880) |
| Non Wuhan | 10,378 | 0.91 | ||
| Stage 2 | Wuhan City | 1282 | 1.28 | −0.881 (ρ = 0.881) |
| Non Wuhan | 28,441 | 1.30 | ||
| Stage 3,4,5 | Wuhan City | 2000 | 1.28 | −0.320 (ρ = 0.505) |
| Non Wuhan | 50,996 | 1.29 |
Note: *p < 0.05 、**p < 0.01、***p < 0.001.