Aaron J Kaat1, Amy M Shui2, Sheila S Ghods2, Cristan A Farmer3, Amy N Esler4, Audrey Thurm3, Stelios Georgiades5, Stephen M Kanne6, Catherine Lord7, Young Shin Kim2, Somer L Bishop2. 1. Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA. 2. Department of Psychiatry, UCSF Weill Institute for Neurosciences, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA. 3. Pediatrics & Developmental Neuroscience Branch, National Institute of Mental Health, Bethesda, MD, USA. 4. University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA. 5. McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada. 6. University of Missouri Thompson Center, Columbia, MO, USA. 7. University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Concerns have been raised that scores on standard measures of autism spectrum disorder (ASD) symptoms may differ as a function of sex. However, these findings are hindered by small female samples studied thus far. The current study evaluated if, after accounting for age, IQ, and language level, sex affects ASD severity estimates from diagnostic measures among children with ASD. METHODS: Data were obtained from eight sources comprising 27 sites. Linear mixed-effects models, including a random effect for site, were fit for 10 outcomes (Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule [ADOS] domain-level calibrated severity scores, Autism Diagnostic Interview-Revised [ADI-R] raw scores by age-based algorithm, and raw scores from the two indices on the Social Responsiveness Scale [SRS]). Sex was added to the models after controlling for age, NVIQ, and an indicator for language level. RESULTS: Sex significantly improved model fit for half of the outcomes, but least square mean differences were generally negligible (effect sizes [ES] < 0.20), increasing to small to moderate in adolescence (ES < 0.40). Boys received more severe RRB scores than girls on both the ADOS and ADI-R (age 4 + algorithm), and girls received more severe scores than boys on both SRS indices, which emerged in adolescence. CONCLUSIONS: This study combined several available databases to create the largest sample of girls with ASD diagnoses. We found minimal differences due to sex beyond other known influences on ASD severity indicators. This may suggest that, among children who ultimately receive a clinical ASD diagnosis, severity estimates do not systematically differ to such an extent that sex-specific scoring procedures would be necessary. However, given the limitations inherent in clinically ascertained samples, future research must address questions about systematic sex differences among children or adults who do not receive clinical diagnoses of ASD. Moreover, while the current study helps resolve questions about widely used diagnostic instruments, we could not address sex differences in phenotypic aspects outside of these scores.
BACKGROUND: Concerns have been raised that scores on standard measures of autism spectrum disorder (ASD) symptoms may differ as a function of sex. However, these findings are hindered by small female samples studied thus far. The current study evaluated if, after accounting for age, IQ, and language level, sex affects ASD severity estimates from diagnostic measures among children with ASD. METHODS: Data were obtained from eight sources comprising 27 sites. Linear mixed-effects models, including a random effect for site, were fit for 10 outcomes (Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule [ADOS] domain-level calibrated severity scores, Autism Diagnostic Interview-Revised [ADI-R] raw scores by age-based algorithm, and raw scores from the two indices on the Social Responsiveness Scale [SRS]). Sex was added to the models after controlling for age, NVIQ, and an indicator for language level. RESULTS: Sex significantly improved model fit for half of the outcomes, but least square mean differences were generally negligible (effect sizes [ES] < 0.20), increasing to small to moderate in adolescence (ES < 0.40). Boys received more severe RRB scores than girls on both the ADOS and ADI-R (age 4 + algorithm), and girls received more severe scores than boys on both SRS indices, which emerged in adolescence. CONCLUSIONS: This study combined several available databases to create the largest sample of girls with ASD diagnoses. We found minimal differences due to sex beyond other known influences on ASD severity indicators. This may suggest that, among children who ultimately receive a clinical ASD diagnosis, severity estimates do not systematically differ to such an extent that sex-specific scoring procedures would be necessary. However, given the limitations inherent in clinically ascertained samples, future research must address questions about systematic sex differences among children or adults who do not receive clinical diagnoses of ASD. Moreover, while the current study helps resolve questions about widely used diagnostic instruments, we could not address sex differences in phenotypic aspects outside of these scores.
Authors: Ahnalee Brincks; Samantha Montag; George W Howe; Shi Huang; Juned Siddique; Soyeon Ahn; Irwin N Sandler; Hilda Pantin; C Hendricks Brown Journal: Prev Sci Date: 2018-02
Authors: Sander Begeer; David Mandell; Bernadette Wijnker-Holmes; Stance Venderbosch; Dorien Rem; Fred Stekelenburg; Hans M Koot Journal: J Autism Dev Disord Date: 2013-05
Authors: Amy N Esler; Jeannette Sample; Jennifer Hall-Lande; Bryn Harris; Catherine Rice; Jenny Poynter; Russell S Kirby; Lisa Wiggins Journal: J Autism Dev Disord Date: 2022-02-25
Authors: Emily F Dillon; Stephen Kanne; Rebecca J Landa; Robert Annett; Raphael Bernier; Catherine Bradley; Laura Carpenter; So Hyun Kim; Julia Parish-Morris; Robert Schultz; Ericka L Wodka Journal: J Autism Dev Disord Date: 2021-12-02
Authors: Catherine A Burrows; James W Bodfish; Jason J Wolff; Elayne P Vollman; Melody R Altschuler; Kelly N Botteron; Stephen R Dager; Annette M Estes; Heather C Hazlett; John R Pruett; Robert T Schultz; Lonnie Zwaigenbaum; Joseph Piven; Jed T Elison Journal: Autism Res Date: 2021-05-22 Impact factor: 4.633
Authors: Blythe A Corbett; Jessica M Schwartzman; Erin J Libsack; Rachael A Muscatello; Matthew D Lerner; Grace L Simmons; Susan W White Journal: Autism Res Date: 2020-11-21 Impact factor: 5.216
Authors: Ericka L Wodka; Julia Parish-Morris; Robert D Annett; Laura Carpenter; Emily Dillon; Jacob Michaelson; So Hyun Kim; Rebecca Landa; Stephen Kanne Journal: Clin Neuropsychol Date: 2021-07-27 Impact factor: 4.373