OBJECTIVE: Growing awareness that symptoms of autism spectrum disorder (ASD) transcend multiple diagnostic categories, and major advances in the identification of genetic syndromes associated with ASD, have led to widespread use of ASD symptom measures in etiologic studies of neurodevelopmental disorders. Insufficient consideration of potentially confounding factors such as cognitive ability or behavior problems can have important negative consequences in interpretation of findings, including erroneous estimation of associations between ASD and etiologic factors. METHOD: Participants were 388 children 2 to 13 years old with diagnoses of ASD or another neurodevelopmental disorder without ASD. Receiver operating characteristics methods were used to assess the influence of IQ and emotional and behavioral problems on the discriminative ability of 3 widely used ASD symptom measures: the Social Responsiveness Scale (SRS), the Autism Diagnostic Interview-Revised (ADI-R), and the Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule (ADOS). RESULTS: IQ influenced the discriminative thresholds of the SRS and ADI-R, and emotional and behavioral problems affected the discriminative thresholds of the SRS, ADI-R, and ADOS. This resulted in low specificity of ASD cutoffs on the SRS and ADI-R for children with intellectual disability without ASD (27-42%) and low specificity across all 3 instruments for children without ASD with increased emotional and behavioral problems (36-59%). Adjustment for these characteristics resulted in improved discriminative ability for all of the ASD measures. CONCLUSION: The findings indicate that scores on ASD symptom measures reflect far more than ASD symptoms. Valid interpretation of scores on these measures requires steps to account for the influences of IQ and emotional and behavioral problems.
OBJECTIVE: Growing awareness that symptoms of autism spectrum disorder (ASD) transcend multiple diagnostic categories, and major advances in the identification of genetic syndromes associated with ASD, have led to widespread use of ASD symptom measures in etiologic studies of neurodevelopmental disorders. Insufficient consideration of potentially confounding factors such as cognitive ability or behavior problems can have important negative consequences in interpretation of findings, including erroneous estimation of associations between ASD and etiologic factors. METHOD:Participants were 388 children 2 to 13 years old with diagnoses of ASD or another neurodevelopmental disorder without ASD. Receiver operating characteristics methods were used to assess the influence of IQ and emotional and behavioral problems on the discriminative ability of 3 widely used ASD symptom measures: the Social Responsiveness Scale (SRS), the Autism Diagnostic Interview-Revised (ADI-R), and the Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule (ADOS). RESULTS: IQ influenced the discriminative thresholds of the SRS and ADI-R, and emotional and behavioral problems affected the discriminative thresholds of the SRS, ADI-R, and ADOS. This resulted in low specificity of ASD cutoffs on the SRS and ADI-R for children with intellectual disability without ASD (27-42%) and low specificity across all 3 instruments for children without ASD with increased emotional and behavioral problems (36-59%). Adjustment for these characteristics resulted in improved discriminative ability for all of the ASD measures. CONCLUSION: The findings indicate that scores on ASD symptom measures reflect far more than ASD symptoms. Valid interpretation of scores on these measures requires steps to account for the influences of IQ and emotional and behavioral problems.
Authors: Jacqueline A Duvall; Ake Lu; Rita M Cantor; Richard D Todd; John N Constantino; Daniel H Geschwind Journal: Am J Psychiatry Date: 2007-04 Impact factor: 18.112
Authors: Thomas W Frazier; Eric A Youngstrom; Rebecca Embacher; Antonio Y Hardan; John N Constantino; Paul Law; Robert L Findling; Charis Eng Journal: Autism Date: 2013-10-08
Authors: Krupa Sheth; Joanna Moss; Sarah Hyland; Chris Stinton; Trevor Cole; Chris Oliver Journal: Am J Med Genet A Date: 2015-09-29 Impact factor: 2.802
Authors: Fred Volkmar; Matthew Siegel; Marc Woodbury-Smith; Bryan King; James McCracken; Matthew State Journal: J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry Date: 2014-02 Impact factor: 8.829
Authors: Linda Sprenger; Eva Bühler; Luise Poustka; Christiane Bach; Monika Heinzel-Gutenbrunner; Inge Kamp-Becker; Christian Bachmann Journal: Res Dev Disabil Date: 2013-08-22
Authors: Somer L Bishop; Cristan Farmer; Vanessa Bal; Elise B Robinson; A Jeremy Willsey; Donna M Werling; Karoline Alexandra Havdahl; Stephan J Sanders; Audrey Thurm Journal: Am J Psychiatry Date: 2017-03-03 Impact factor: 18.112
Authors: Steven J Korzeniewski; Robert M Joseph; So Hyun Kim; Elizabeth N Allred; T Michael OʼShea; Alan Leviton; Karl C K Kuban Journal: J Dev Behav Pediatr Date: 2017 Nov/Dec Impact factor: 2.225
Authors: Carolyn E B McCormick; Brian C Kavanaugh; Danielle Sipsock; Giulia Righi; Lindsay M Oberman; Daniel Moreno De Luca; Ece D Gamsiz Uzun; Carrie R Best; Beth A Jerskey; Joanne G Quinn; Susan B Jewel; Pei-Chi Wu; Rebecca L McLean; Todd P Levine; Hasmik Tokadjian; Kayla A Perkins; Elaine B Clarke; Brittany Dunn; Alan H Gerber; Elena J Tenenbaum; Thomas F Anders; Stephen J Sheinkopf; Eric M Morrow Journal: Autism Res Date: 2020-01-20 Impact factor: 5.216
Authors: Charlotte DiStefano; Rujuta B Wilson; Carly Hyde; Edwin H Cook; Ronald L Thibert; Lawrence T Reiter; Vanessa Vogel-Farley; Joerg Hipp; Shafali Jeste Journal: Am J Med Genet A Date: 2019-10-26 Impact factor: 2.802