Literature DB >> 32313766

Outcomes of Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding Based on Time to Endoscopy: A Retrospective Study.

Sheikh A Saleem1, Pujitha Kudaravalli2, Sana Riaz2, Venkata Satish Pendela3, Dongliang Wang4, Dhruv Lowe1, Divey Manocha1.   

Abstract

Introduction Non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB) is a major burden on the health care system. The timing of endoscopy has been an ongoing debate and data on the association of early endoscopy with a better or worse clinical outcome are conflicting. In our study, we aimed to identify the benefits versus the risks of performing an urgent endoscopy in regards to the number of endoscopic interventions, length of hospital stay, number of packed red blood cells (PRBCs) transfused, and mortality.  Methodology This is a retrospective record-based study. A total of 806 charts were reviewed and 251 patients with the signs and symptoms of UGIB on presentation were included in the study. Patients with variceal bleeding, lower gastrointestinal bleeding, insignificant bleeds with no drop in H/H, GI bleed not being the presenting complaint on admission, and patients on anticoagulation were excluded. Results Out of the patients who underwent an urgent esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD), 26.2% needed a second-look EGD 48 hours after the first EGD when compared to 4% and 2% in the early (12-24 hours) and late (>24 hours) endoscopy groups, respectively. In patients who underwent urgent EGD, 23% had active bleeding and it was statistically significant when compared to the other groups. The active bleeding limited the visualization during the endoscopy, which led to a repeat EGD in the urgent EGD group. If an endoscopic intervention was received, patients having EGD >24 hours received a smaller number of interventions. There was no statistical difference in the Blatchford scores between the three groups, indicating that the groups were similar in morbidity. No difference in mortality, hospital length of stay, or number of blood transfusions received, surgical or interventional radiology-guided interventions was found between the three groups. Conclusion Patients who underwent urgent endoscopy had more procedures, with no difference in mortality, number of units of blood transfused, or length of hospitalization when compared to the early or late endoscopy groups.
Copyright © 2020, Saleem et al.

Entities:  

Keywords:  endoscopy; interventions; mortality; timing; upper gastrointestinal bleeding

Year:  2020        PMID: 32313766      PMCID: PMC7164718          DOI: 10.7759/cureus.7325

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cureus        ISSN: 2168-8184


  28 in total

1.  Early or delayed endoscopy for patients with peptic ulcer bleeding. A prospective randomized study.

Authors:  H J Lin; K Wang; C L Perng; R T Chua; F Y Lee; C H Lee; S D Lee
Journal:  J Clin Gastroenterol       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 3.062

2.  Risk assessment after acute upper gastrointestinal haemorrhage.

Authors:  T A Rockall; R F Logan; H B Devlin; T C Northfield
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 23.059

Review 3.  Optimizing proton pump inhibitor therapy for treatment of nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding.

Authors:  Jarett C Worden; Kirollos S Hanna
Journal:  Am J Health Syst Pharm       Date:  2017-02-01       Impact factor: 2.637

Review 4.  Endoscopy for upper gastrointestinal bleeding: how urgent is it?

Authors:  Kelvin K F Tsoi; Terry K W Ma; Joseph J Y Sung
Journal:  Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2009-07-14       Impact factor: 46.802

5.  Analysis of 3,294 cases of upper gastrointestinal bleeding in military medical facilities.

Authors:  R T Yavorski; R K Wong; C Maydonovitch; L S Battin; A Furnia; D E Amundson
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 10.864

Review 6.  Intermittent vs continuous proton pump inhibitor therapy for high-risk bleeding ulcers: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Hamita Sachar; Keta Vaidya; Loren Laine
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 21.873

7.  The economics of upper gastrointestinal bleeding in a US managed-care setting: a retrospective, claims-based analysis.

Authors:  B L Cryer; C M Wilcox; H J Henk; G Zlateva; L Chen; V Zarotsky
Journal:  J Med Econ       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 2.448

8.  Limited value of early endoscopy in the management of acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding. Prospective controlled trial.

Authors:  D Y Graham
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1980-08       Impact factor: 2.565

9.  Erythromycin infusion prior to endoscopy for acute nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding: a pilot randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Hee Kyong Na; Hwoon-Yong Jung; Dong Woo Seo; Hyun Lim; Ji Yong Ahn; Jeong Hoon Lee; Do Hoon Kim; Kee Don Choi; Ho June Song; Gin Hyug Lee; Jin-Ho Kim
Journal:  Korean J Intern Med       Date:  2017-03-28       Impact factor: 2.884

10.  Early esophagogastroduodenoscopy is associated with better Outcomes in upper gastrointestinal bleeding: a nationwide study.

Authors:  Sushil K Garg; Chimaobi Anugwom; James Campbell; Vaibhav Wadhwa; Nancy Gupta; Rocio Lopez; Sukhman Shergill; Madhusudhan R Sanaka
Journal:  Endosc Int Open       Date:  2017-05
View more
  2 in total

1.  Timing of endoscopy for acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding: a territory-wide cohort study.

Authors:  Cosmos L T Guo; Sunny H Wong; Louis H S Lau; Rashid N S Lui; Joyce W Y Mak; Raymond S Y Tang; Terry C F Yip; William K K Wu; Grace L H Wong; Francis K L Chan; James Y W Lau; Joseph J Y Sung
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2021-09-21       Impact factor: 31.793

2.  Effect of holiday admission on clinical outcome of patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding: A real-world report from Thailand.

Authors:  Arunchai Chang; Chokethawee Ouejiaraphant; Nuttanit Pungpipattrakul; Keerati Akarapatima; Attapon Rattanasupar; Varayu Prachayakul
Journal:  Heliyon       Date:  2022-08-24
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.