Literature DB >> 7717312

Analysis of 3,294 cases of upper gastrointestinal bleeding in military medical facilities.

R T Yavorski1, R K Wong, C Maydonovitch, L S Battin, A Furnia, D E Amundson.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB) remains a commonly encountered medical emergency with significant morbidity and mortality. Most large studies detailing the specific incidence, demographic, and mortality data were performed more than a decade ago. This study analyzes 3,294 cases of UGIB from 139 military medical treatment facilities over a 12-month period.
METHODS: A retrospective chart review of Department of Defense military medical treatment facilities for UGIB was performed from October 1990 through September 1991. Core data such as demographic information were analyzed, as well as specific data relating to UGIB.
RESULTS: The incidence of UGIB was 36 per 100,000 population with a male-to-female ratio of 2.18 and a mean age of 52 +/- 19.65 yr. The number of cases increased with age; 44.5% of all patients were > or = 60 yr old. The overall mortality was 7.0% (231 of 3294), and death rates were similar among males and females (7.1% vs. 6.8%) with an odds ratio of 1.03 (CI: 0.77-1.402). Mortality increased with age in both genders; 73.2% of deaths occurred in patients more than 60 yr old. Comorbid illness was noted in 50.9% (1675 of 3294) of patients, with similar occurrence in males (48.7%) and females (55.4%). One or more comorbid illnesses were noted in 98.3% of the patients who died, and in 72.3% of cases, they were the primary cause of death. Bleeding was the primary cause of death in 18.6% of patients. Upper endoscopy was performed in 68.8% of cases, therapeutic endoscopy in 12.6%, repeat endoscopy in 10.7%, and surgery in 4.4%. Blood transfusions were administered in 47.3% of cases, with most patients receiving < 5 units of blood. Rebleeding after initial hemostasis was noted in 7.1% of cases. Factors related to increased mortality include age > 60 (p < 0.001), transfusion requirement > 5 U (p < 0.001), presence of comorbid illness (p < 0.001), rebleeding after initial hemostasis (p < 0.005), surgery (p < 0.001), and UGIB occurring during hospitalization (p = 0.027).
CONCLUSIONS: We conclude: 1) The incidence of UGIB is 2-fold greater in males than in females, in all age groups; however, the death rate is similar in both sexes. 2) The mortality rate in this study is slightly lower than in most previous studies and may be more reflective of the average mortality in the community at large. 3) In UGIB patients, comorbid illness and not actual bleeding is the major cause of death. 4) Upper endoscopy was performed less often in this study than in other studies, and there were fewer blood transfusions; however, rebleeding and mortality rates remained similar.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7717312

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol        ISSN: 0002-9270            Impact factor:   10.864


  45 in total

1.  The efficacy of high- and low-dose intravenous omeprazole in preventing rebleeding for patients with bleeding peptic ulcers and comorbid illnesses.

Authors:  Hsiu-Chi Cheng; Ai-Wen Kao; Chiao-Hsiung Chuang; Bor-Shyang Sheu
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 3.199

2.  Validation of the Rockall scoring system for outcomes from non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding in a Canadian setting.

Authors:  Robert-A Enns; Yves-M Gagnon; Alan-N Barkun; David Armstrong; Jamie-C Gregor; Richard-N Fedorak
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2006-12-28       Impact factor: 5.742

3.  Achievement of endoscopic hemostasis.

Authors:  Sandy H Pang; Francis K L Chan
Journal:  Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 46.802

4.  Dieulafoy-like lesion bleeding: in the loop.

Authors:  Pragnesh Patel; Martin Tobi
Journal:  Gastroenterol Hepatol (N Y)       Date:  2011-04

Review 5.  Endoscopic hemostasis for peptic ulcer bleeding: systematic review and meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Felipe Baracat; Eduardo Moura; Wanderley Bernardo; Leonardo Zorron Pu; Ernesto Mendonça; Diogo Moura; Renato Baracat; Edson Ide
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-10-20       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Validation of a Machine Learning Model That Outperforms Clinical Risk Scoring Systems for Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding.

Authors:  Dennis L Shung; Benjamin Au; Richard Andrew Taylor; J Kenneth Tay; Stig B Laursen; Adrian J Stanley; Harry R Dalton; Jeffrey Ngu; Michael Schultz; Loren Laine
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2019-09-25       Impact factor: 22.682

7.  Association between weekend admission and mortality for upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage: an observational study and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Erin Renae Weeda; Brandon Scott Nicoll; Craig Ian Coleman; Anna Sharovetskaya; William Leslie Baker
Journal:  Intern Emerg Med       Date:  2016-08-17       Impact factor: 3.397

Review 8.  Diagnosis of gastrointestinal bleeding: A practical guide for clinicians.

Authors:  Bong Sik Matthew Kim; Bob T Li; Alexander Engel; Jaswinder S Samra; Stephen Clarke; Ian D Norton; Angela E Li
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Pathophysiol       Date:  2014-11-15

9.  Risk factors for mortality in severe upper gastrointestinal bleeding.

Authors:  Frank Klebl; Nicole Bregenzer; Lars Schöfer; Wolfgang Tamme; Julia Langgartner; Jürgen Schölmerich; Helmut Messmann
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2004-08-19       Impact factor: 2.571

10.  Predictors of poor outcome in gastrointestinal bleeding in emergency department.

Authors:  Ender Kaya; Mehmet Ali Karaca; Deniz Aldemir; M Mahir Ozmen
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-04-28       Impact factor: 5.742

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.