Literature DB >> 32313507

The Beauty and the Dish: Brain Organoids Go Active.

Alberto Sanchez-Aguilera, Liset Menendez de la Prida.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Year:  2020        PMID: 32313507      PMCID: PMC7160880          DOI: 10.1177/1535759720901502

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Epilepsy Curr        ISSN: 1535-7511            Impact factor:   7.500


× No keyword cloud information.

Commentary

The brain is such an incredibly complex organ that any attempt at emulation seems utopian. From the diabolical Donovan’s brain to the Turing machine, the imitation game stays unsolved. It always lacks the soul. Our soul has the form of a beat, a river babbling; a cacophony of spikes nested in the electrical waves of the brain rhythms. A silent brain is nothing. Attempts of growing brain tissue started long ago.[1] In less than a dozen years, research with stem cell–derived brain organoids has faced vertiginous advances in understanding their cellular diversity and development,[2,3] yet the question remains of whether they are able to self-organize functionally. Now, a recent paper in Cell Stem Cell by Trujillo et al[4] found the beat. Oscillatory network activity perhaps similar to preterm neonatal brainwaves can emerge from brain organoids cultured over 10 months. Using single-cell RNAseq, immunohistochemistry and mass spectrometry, Trujillo et al described the growth and maturation of organoids with cortical specification. They showed the development from an initial condition with the dominance of progenitor cells (expressing Ki-67, SOX2, and Nestin) and intermediate progenitors (expressing TBR2) to a final stage with a proportion of glial cells, glutamatergic neurons, and GABAergic interneurons. Interestingly, neither the presence of GABAergic markers (GAD65, DLX1, and DLX5) nor the GABA neurotransmitter were found in organoids younger than 6 months although there were already glutamatergic neurons expressing subunits of GABAergic receptors. Another recent report with cortical organoids confirmed the appearance of inhibitory interneuron precursors and immature inhibitory interneurons in 6-month-old but not in 3-month-old organoids.[5] In the human brain, it has been described that cortical interneurons expressing DLX2, a transcription factor essential for their differentiation and migration, are present after 10 weeks of conception.[6] Possibly, brain organoids incorporating ganglionic eminence interneuron progenitors in addition to excitatory cell lineages will likely pattern similar to brains. To address the functional characterization of their cortical organoids, Trujillo et al first performed patch-clamp experiments. Individual neurons showed normal resting potential, fired sodium-dependent action potentials, and presented excitatory postsynaptic potentials that were blocked with N-methyl-d-aspartate receptor and α-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazolepropionic acid (AMPA)/Kainate receptor antagonists. Could electrical activity self-organizes at the mesoscopic level in brain organoids? Previously, correlated calcium activity from single cells was reported in sophisticated brain organoids with cortical regionalization,[2] but network-level activity was not evaluated. Trujillo et al took another chance. They plated organoids over multielectrode arrays to record from individual spikes and local field potentials (LFPs) and found an increment in the firing rate over development. Even in this reduced 2-dimensional flattened structure, organoids also increased the frequency and amplitude of LFP population events over maturation, resembling high-frequency oscillations (100-400 Hz) nested in the delta band (2-3 Hz). The oscillatory power dynamics followed an inverted-U trajectory along the organoid development that authors interpreted as an initial acquisition of sparse oscillations at early stages and an increased dispersion of the oscillatory modes in late. Others have inserted electrodes to record tridimensional LFP signals or have functionalized organoids to make them photosensitive for light stimulation.[7,8] In the real brain, cross-frequency coupling between neuronal oscillations such as θ and γ have been described both in rodents and humans.[9,10] In organoids, Trujillo et al observed that the application of the sodium channel blocker Tetrodotoxin abolished electrical activity and that glutamatergic receptor antagonists and GABAergic agonists reduced the frequency of both spikes and LFP events. Interestingly, the blockade of the GABAergic transmission abolished nested oscillatory activity but not spiking, suggesting that inhibition is critical for pacing the beat in this preparation. In their report, Trujillo et al compared their results with a public electroencephalogram (EEG) data set from preterm infants.[11] Because the biophysical properties of the scalp EEG are missing in organoids, they rely on basic EEG features such as the frequency of oscillations and duration of events. They found similar developmental trajectories. Using a regularized regression and cross-validated model of brainwaves, they were able to predict the organoid developmental time after 25 weeks of plating. Before that, the model performed suboptimal, yet it captured some trend. Cerebral organoids are no more than layers of cortex around some choroid plexus. Although they recapitulate basic developmental programs, many critical biological processes are absent. For instance, GABA plays major depolarizing roles early in development,[12] a circumstance that perhaps is missing in cortical organoids. Similarly, appropriate interhemispheric connectivity, which is essential for normal EEG patterns, follows independent developmental programs[13] and requires activity-dependent tuning.[14] In real brains, sensory inputs and feedback from fetal movements contribute to shape brain-wide oscillations and the formation and refinement of cortical connectivity.[15] Every brain needs a body. The paper by Trujillo et al is a potential game changer. The use of organoids as models for neuropsychiatric and developmental diseases opens new opportunities to evaluate the underlying physiopathology and to assay new therapeutic strategies. They can be combined with organotypic cultures of cortical surgical samples given recent advances in protocols allowing for optimized transduction of transgenes and viral vector strategies.[16-18] Together, these 2 in vitro tools may transform the study of the human brain ex vivo in a more personalized way (Figure 1). Oscillations not only represent the basic functional mode of the brain but they are essential for a proper construction. By focusing in oscillatory patterns as organizational principles of developmental physiological programs, we can take a big leap in our understanding of brain function and dysfunction.[19]
Figure 1.

Organoid and organotypic preparations of the human brain are revolutionizing biomedical research. Stem cell–derived organoids plated over multielectrode arrays allow studying physiopathological aspects of many neurological conditions. Whenever possible, they can be combined with organotypic cultures of human brain surgical samples, such as in cases of epilepsy or brain tumors. Both preparations can be functionalized with novel cell-type-specific opto- and chemogenetic approaches to test the physiological impact of novel genetic and pharmacological therapeutic approaches in a more personalized way. Illustrated by Andrea Navas-Olive.

Organoid and organotypic preparations of the human brain are revolutionizing biomedical research. Stem cell–derived organoids plated over multielectrode arrays allow studying physiopathological aspects of many neurological conditions. Whenever possible, they can be combined with organotypic cultures of human brain surgical samples, such as in cases of epilepsy or brain tumors. Both preparations can be functionalized with novel cell-type-specific opto- and chemogenetic approaches to test the physiological impact of novel genetic and pharmacological therapeutic approaches in a more personalized way. Illustrated by Andrea Navas-Olive.
  17 in total

1.  Cux1 Enables Interhemispheric Connections of Layer II/III Neurons by Regulating Kv1-Dependent Firing.

Authors:  Fernanda M Rodríguez-Tornos; Carlos G Briz; Linnea A Weiss; Alvaro Sebastián-Serrano; Saúl Ares; Marta Navarrete; Laura Frangeul; Maria Galazo; Denis Jabaudon; José A Esteban; Marta Nieto
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2016-01-21       Impact factor: 17.173

Review 2.  Inhibition and oscillations in the human brain tissue in vitro.

Authors:  Liset Menendez de la Prida; Gilles Huberfeld
Journal:  Neurobiol Dis       Date:  2019-02-08       Impact factor: 5.996

3.  Complex Oscillatory Waves Emerging from Cortical Organoids Model Early Human Brain Network Development.

Authors:  Cleber A Trujillo; Richard Gao; Priscilla D Negraes; Jing Gu; Justin Buchanan; Sebastian Preissl; Allen Wang; Wei Wu; Gabriel G Haddad; Isaac A Chaim; Alain Domissy; Matthieu Vandenberghe; Anna Devor; Gene W Yeo; Bradley Voytek; Alysson R Muotri
Journal:  Cell Stem Cell       Date:  2019-08-29       Impact factor: 24.633

Review 4.  Development, specification, and diversity of callosal projection neurons.

Authors:  Ryann M Fame; Jessica L MacDonald; Jeffrey D Macklis
Journal:  Trends Neurosci       Date:  2010-12-02       Impact factor: 13.837

Review 5.  The functional role of cross-frequency coupling.

Authors:  Ryan T Canolty; Robert T Knight
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 20.229

Review 6.  Excitatory actions of gaba during development: the nature of the nurture.

Authors:  Yehezkel Ben-Ari
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 34.870

7.  Cross-frequency coupling between neuronal oscillations.

Authors:  Ole Jensen; Laura L Colgin
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2007-06-04       Impact factor: 20.229

8.  Imaging pathological activities of human brain tissue in organotypic culture.

Authors:  Caroline Le Duigou; Etienne Savary; Mélanie Morin-Brureau; Daniel Gomez-Dominguez; André Sobczyk; Farah Chali; Giampaolo Milior; Larissa Kraus; Jochen C Meier; Dimitri M Kullmann; Bertrand Mathon; Liset Menendez de la Prida; Georg Dorfmuller; Johan Pallud; Emmanuel Eugène; Stéphane Clemenceau; Richard Miles
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2018-02-07       Impact factor: 2.390

9.  Cerebral organoids model human brain development and microcephaly.

Authors:  Madeline A Lancaster; Magdalena Renner; Carol-Anne Martin; Daniel Wenzel; Louise S Bicknell; Matthew E Hurles; Tessa Homfray; Josef M Penninger; Andrew P Jackson; Juergen A Knoblich
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2013-08-28       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  Individual brain organoids reproducibly form cell diversity of the human cerebral cortex.

Authors:  Silvia Velasco; Amanda J Kedaigle; Sean K Simmons; Allison Nash; Marina Rocha; Giorgia Quadrato; Bruna Paulsen; Lan Nguyen; Xian Adiconis; Aviv Regev; Joshua Z Levin; Paola Arlotta
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2019-06-05       Impact factor: 49.962

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.