| Literature DB >> 32313462 |
Kendall Bicknell1, Christopher Helpert1, Kourtney Dwyer1,2, Brett McKnight3, Sonali Singh1, Samuel Fulcher1, Derrick Fung1,2.
Abstract
This study examined how different methods of biometric measurement, types of intraocular lens calculation, and levels of surgeon experience affected predicted postoperative astigmatism with toric intraocular lens implantation. The error in predicted residual astigmatism was determined using the IOL Master 500 and Lenstar LS 900 devices and was calculated by the Alcon toric calculator, Alcon toric calculator with Baylor nomogram, and Barrett toric calculator. Results were reviewed from 147 eyes of 125 patients. Of the three calculations, the Barrett toric calculator had the lowest mean absolute error in predicted residual astigmatism (P < 0.0001). The mean absolute errors of the IOL Master 500 and the Lenstar LS 900 were not significantly different when compared using three different calculation methods (P = 0.54). The mean absolute error was significantly lower (P = 0.049) for ophthalmology staff than for ophthalmology residents when calculation methods were considered. In conclusion, the calculation method used for IOL selection in cataract surgery significantly affects the accuracy of both staff and residents.Entities:
Keywords: astigmatism; toric intraocular lens
Year: 2020 PMID: 32313462 PMCID: PMC7155977 DOI: 10.1080/08998280.2020.1724846
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent) ISSN: 0899-8280