Abolfazl Firouzian1, Hadi Darvishi Khezri2. 1. Department of Anesthesiology Faculty of Medicine Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences Sari Iran. 2. Thalassemia Research Center Hemoglobinopathy Institute Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences Sari Iran.
Gastric mucosal injury has been reported to occur during the first 24 h of hospital admission in 75–100% of intensive‐care unit (ICU) patients.1 Upper gastrointestinal tract bleeding (UGIB) resulting from stress‐ulceration is a common outcome of such injury.2 The estimated incidence of UGIB ranges from 1.5% to 6% of all ICU patients.Although stress‐ulcer prophylaxis is indicated for critical patients at high risk for UGIB, the use of these drugs can increase the likelihood of ventilator‐associated pneumonia (VAP) because of the increase in gastric bacterial colonisation, gastric reflux and subsequent micro‐aspiration into the lower respiratory tract.2, 3 Despite progress in this area, the majority of issues relating to the management of VAP and its risk factors remain unresolved in clinical practice.Stress‐ulcer prophylaxis for the prevention of UGIB can include the use of anti‐reflux agents (such as sucralfate), proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) (such as pantoprazole) and histamine‐2‐receptor antagonists (H2RA) (such as ranitidine).4 Sucralfate covers the gastric mucosa and prevents the movement of bacteria towards the pharynx and lungs. Considering that gastric acid production is not inhibited with the use of sucralfate, patients receiving sucralfate therapy are less likely to experience aspiration pneumonia relative to other agents.4 Although the risk of aspiration and VAP is reduced following the use of sucralfate, the development of UGIB is relatively higher.5, 6Moderate to high quality evidence supports the use of acid‐inhibiting agents over sucralfate in the prevention of UGIB.5 However, the administration of PPIs and H2RAs as acid inhibitors can facilitate the colonisation of bacteria in the stomach by inhibiting the secretion of gastric acid. This can create a source for bacterial micro‐aspiration into the lungs, which increases the risk of VAP.4Given the increased risk of pneumonia and/or UGIB with these aforementioned medications, there is a need for appropriate adjuvant agents that can reduce the risk of VAP and UGIB concomitantly and with minimal complication. Glycyrrhiza glabra L. (licorice) maybe one such agent.Glycyrrhiza glabra is a traditional medicinal herb that grows in many parts of the world.7 Glycyrrhizin (glycyrrhizinic acid), glabridin, glabrene, glabrol, licoflavonol, glycyrol and licoricone are some of the compounds isolated from G. glabra.7 In medicine, G. glabra root has commonly been used to treat gastric and duodenal ulceration as an alternative to bismuth. The root has been shown to have a protective role against acid and pepsin secretion by covering the site of the lesion and promoting mucous secretion.8, 9Szweda et al. evaluated the muco‐protective effects of G. glabra (i.e. liquid alcohol extract) on caninecolonic mucosa following the administration of NSAIDs at an oral dose of 50 mg every 24 h in dogs weighing up to 10 kg.10 Their results showed a reduction in the severity of NSAID‐induced mucosal damage after prophylactic treatment with G. glabra. Sancar et al. achieved the same results.11 Moreover, Ligha et al. demonstrated that G. glabra had protective effects against alcohol‐induced gastric mucosa damage by increasing mucus production, preventing mucus depletion and/or inhibiting lipid peroxidation.12
Glycyrrhiza glabra thus offers a natural approach for the management of gastro‐oesophageal reflux disease and related disorders.13To the best of our knowledge, there are few preclinical and clinical studies that have evaluated the anti‐reflux properties of G. glabra extract. The antibacterial activity of G. glabra is well known, however. Several in vitro studies have shown that many compounds isolated from the extract of G. glabra have antibacterial effects against methicillin sensitive Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA), methicillin resistant S. aureus (MRSA), Mycobacterium tuberculosis and Helicobacter pylori.7, 14, 15 Animal studies also reveal a decrease in mortality and viral activity after using G. glabra against Herpes simplex, HIV‐1, severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS)‐related coronavirus (SARS‐CoV), respiratory syncytial virus (RSV), arboviruses, vesicular stomatitis virus (VSV) and influenza A virus pneumonia.16 Considering that selective digestive tract decontamination (SDD) is an important measure for VAP prevention in the ICU patient,17 the antimicrobial properties of G. glabra might be beneficial in reducing the risk of VAP in critically illpatients.Recently, an in‐vitro study demonstrated that G. glabra provides a high grade of protection against alpha‐haemolysin‐mediated alveolar epithelial cell injury and can relieve the pulmonary inflammatory reaction caused by S. aureus‐induced pneumonia in a murine model. The authors proposed that G. glabra may potentially be useful for the treatment of S. aureus‐induced pneumonia when used in combination with beta‐lactam antibiotics.18In summary, it seems that G. glabra might reduce the risk of UGIB and also prevent the development of VAP through antibacterial, anti‐reflux, anti‐peptic ulceration and anti‐inflammatory effects in ICU intubated patients. Furthermore, G. glabra has a low‐cost, high tolerability and minimal side‐effects. We recommend further in‐vitro research in this field. Also, with respect to the efficacy of G. glabra, and its related compounds as an adjuvant therapy in clinical medicine, this has yet to be proven; thus, we suggest that double‐blind, randomised controlled studies of G. glabra, with the appropriate dosage and duration of treatment, be conducted in patients undergoing mechanical ventilation in the ICU with close monitoring of VAP and UGIB occurrence.
Authors: Vivek K Gupta; Atiya Fatima; Uzma Faridi; Arvind S Negi; Karuna Shanker; J K Kumar; Neha Rahuja; Suaib Luqman; Brijesh S Sisodia; Dharmendra Saikia; M P Darokar; Suman P S Khanuja Journal: J Ethnopharmacol Date: 2007-12-04 Impact factor: 4.360
Authors: A M G A de Smet; J A J W Kluytmans; B S Cooper; E M Mascini; R F J Benus; T S van der Werf; J G van der Hoeven; P Pickkers; D Bogaers-Hofman; N J M van der Meer; A T Bernards; E J Kuijper; J C A Joore; M A Leverstein-van Hall; A J G H Bindels; A R Jansz; R M J Wesselink; B M de Jongh; P J W Dennesen; G J van Asselt; L F te Velde; I H M E Frenay; K Kaasjager; F H Bosch; M van Iterson; S F T Thijsen; G H Kluge; W Pauw; J W de Vries; J A Kaan; J P Arends; L P H J Aarts; P D J Sturm; H I J Harinck; A Voss; E V Uijtendaal; H E M Blok; E S Thieme Groen; M E Pouw; C J Kalkman; M J M Bonten Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2009-01-01 Impact factor: 91.245