Literature DB >> 21030160

FDG-PET assessment of the effect of head and neck radiotherapy on parotid gland glucose metabolism.

Michael C Roach1, Timothy G Turkington, Kristin A Higgins, Thomas C Hawk, Jenny K Hoang, David M Brizel.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Functional imaging with [F-18]-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) provides the opportunity to define the physiology of the major salivary glands before and after radiation therapy. The goal of this retrospective study was to identify the radiation dose-response relationship of parotid gland glucose metabolism in patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC).
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty-nine adults with HNSCC were identified who had curative intent intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) and FDG-PET imaging before and after treatment. Using a graphical user interface, contours were delineated for the parotid glands on axial CT slices while all authors were blinded to paired PET slices. Average and maximal standard uptake values (SUV) were measured within these anatomic regions. Changes in SUV and volume after radiation therapy were correlated with parotid gland dose-volume histograms from IMRT plans.
RESULTS: The average parotid gland volume was 30.7 mL and contracted 3.9 ± 1.9% with every increase of 10 Gy in mean dose (p = 0.04). However, within the first 3 months after treatment, there was a uniform reduction of 16.5% ± 7.3% regardless of dose. The average SUV(mean) of the glands was 1.63 ± 0.48 pretreatment and declined by 5.2% ± 2.5% for every increase of 10 Gy in mean dose (p = 0.04). The average SUV(max) was 4.07 ± 2.85 pretreatment and decreased in a sigmoid manner with mean dose. A threshold of 32 Gy for mean dose existed, after which SUV(max) declined rapidly.
CONCLUSION: Radiation dose responses of the parotid glands can be measured by integrated CT/FDG-PET scans. Retrospective analysis showed sigmoidal declines in the maximum metabolism but linear declines in the average metabolism of the glands with dose. Future studies should correlate this decline in FDG uptake with saliva production to improve treatment planning.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21030160     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2010.08.055

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys        ISSN: 0360-3016            Impact factor:   7.038


  6 in total

1.  Pattern and predictors of volumetric change of parotid glands during intensity modulated radiotherapy.

Authors:  G Sanguineti; F Ricchetti; O Thomas; B Wu; T McNutt
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2013-09-12       Impact factor: 3.039

2.  Evaluating Positron Emission Tomography-Based Functional Imaging Changes in the Heart After Chemo-Radiation for Patients With Lung Cancer.

Authors:  Yevgeniy Vinogradskiy; Quentin Diot; Bernard Jones; Richard Castillo; Edward Castillo; Jennifer Kwak; Daniel Bowles; Inga Grills; Nicholas Myziuk; Thomas Guerrero; Craig Stevens; Tracey Schefter; Laurie E Gaspar; Brian Kavanagh; Moyed Miften; Chad Rusthoven
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2020-01-23       Impact factor: 7.038

3.  Metabolic imaging biomarkers of postradiotherapy xerostomia.

Authors:  Blake Cannon; David L Schwartz; Lei Dong
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2012-05-30       Impact factor: 7.038

4.  Predicting late radiation-induced xerostomia with parotid gland PET biomarkers and dose metrics.

Authors:  Joel R Wilkie; Michelle L Mierzwa; Keith A Casper; Charles S Mayo; Matthew J Schipper; Avraham Eisbruch; Francis P Worden; Issam El Naqa; Benjamin L Viglianti; Benjamin S Rosen
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  2020-04-06       Impact factor: 6.280

5.  The rationale for HPV-related oropharyngeal cancer de-escalation treatment strategies.

Authors:  Małgorzata Wierzbicka; Krzysztof Szyfter; Piotr Milecki; Krzysztof Składowski; Rodryg Ramlau
Journal:  Contemp Oncol (Pozn)       Date:  2015-09-28

Review 6.  The increasing potential of nuclear medicine imaging for the evaluation and reduction of normal tissue toxicity from radiation treatments.

Authors:  V Mohan; N M Bruin; J B van de Kamer; J-J Sonke; Wouter V Vogel
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2021-03-09       Impact factor: 10.057

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.