Literature DB >> 32306074

Prognostic value of serum inflammatory markers in colorectal cancer.

Sung Chul Lee1, Jung Wook Huh2, Woo Yong Lee3, Seong Hyeon Yun3, Hee Cheol Kim3, Yong Beom Cho3, Yoon Ah Park3, Jung Kyong Shin3.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To date, there have been many studies on postoperative complications and oncologic outcomes, but the findings remain controversial. The purpose of the study was to determine the prognostic value of serum inflammatory markers as pretreatment in curatively resected colorectal cancer. The effects of serum inflammatory marker levels on postoperative morbidity were also examined.
METHODS: Prospectively collected data from 1590 patients with primary sporadic colorectal adenocarcinoma who underwent curative resection between September 2012 and December 2013 at our institution were retrospectively analyzed. White blood cell count (× 103/mcl), neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio, C-reactive protein, erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), and Glasgow prognostic score (GPS) were evaluated. GPS was determined as follows: GPS of 2, elevated CRP level (> 1.0 mg/dl) and hypoalbuminemia (< 3.5 g/dl); GPS of 1, elevated CRP or hypoalbuminemia; and GPS of 0, neither elevated CRP nor hypoalbuminemia.
RESULTS: The median follow-up period for the 1590 patients was 59 months. The overall postoperative morbidity rate was 24.8%. In multivariate analysis, female sex (P = 0.006), rectal cancer other than colon cancer (P < 0.001), CEA level > 5 ng/ml (P < 0.001), ESR > 27 mm/h (P = 0.014), and a GPS of 1 or 2 (P < 0.001) were independent risk predictors for morbidity. A GPS of 1 or 2 (P < 0.001) and postoperative morbidity (P < 0.001) significantly affected both overall survival and disease-free survival in multivariate analyses.
CONCLUSIONS: A GPS of 1 or 2 is a significant risk factor for postoperative morbidity and a prognostic factor for long-term survival.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Colorectal cancer; Glasgow prognostic score; Inflammatory marker; Long-term outcome; Morbidity

Year:  2020        PMID: 32306074     DOI: 10.1007/s00384-020-03591-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis        ISSN: 0179-1958            Impact factor:   2.571


  19 in total

Review 1.  Immunity, inflammation, and cancer.

Authors:  Sergei I Grivennikov; Florian R Greten; Michael Karin
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2010-03-19       Impact factor: 41.582

Review 2.  Microenvironmental regulation of tumor progression and metastasis.

Authors:  Daniela F Quail; Johanna A Joyce
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 53.440

3.  Relationship between nutritional status and the Glasgow Prognostic Score in patients with colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Sílvia Fernandes Maurício; Jacqueline Braga da Silva; Tatiana Bering; Maria Isabel Toulson Davisson Correia
Journal:  Nutrition       Date:  2013-01-05       Impact factor: 4.008

4.  Comparison of Preoperative Inflammation-based Prognostic Scores in Patients With Colorectal Cancer.

Authors:  Yoshiyuki Suzuki; Koji Okabayashi; Hirotoshi Hasegawa; Masashi Tsuruta; Kohei Shigeta; Takayuki Kondo; Yuko Kitagawa
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2018-03       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 5.  The microcirculation and inflammation: modulation of leukocyte-endothelial cell adhesion.

Authors:  D N Granger; P Kubes
Journal:  J Leukoc Biol       Date:  1994-05       Impact factor: 4.962

Review 6.  The Modified Glasgow Prognostic Score and Survival in Colorectal Cancer: A Pooled Analysis of the Literature.

Authors:  Fausto Petrelli; Sandro Barni; Andrea Coinu; Paola Bertocchi; Karen Borgonovo; Mary Cabiddu; Mara Ghilardi; Alberto Zaniboni
Journal:  Rev Recent Clin Trials       Date:  2015

7.  Development of an American College of Surgeons National Surgery Quality Improvement Program: morbidity and mortality risk calculator for colorectal surgery.

Authors:  Mark E Cohen; Karl Y Bilimoria; Clifford Y Ko; Bruce Lee Hall
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2009-04-17       Impact factor: 6.113

8.  A high preoperative neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio is associated with poor survival in patients with colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Masatsune Shibutani; Kiyoshi Maeda; Hisashi Nagahara; Eiji Noda; Hiroshi Ohtani; Yukio Nishiguchi; Kosei Hirakawa
Journal:  Anticancer Res       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 2.480

Review 9.  Cancer-related inflammation.

Authors:  Alberto Mantovani; Paola Allavena; Antonio Sica; Frances Balkwill
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2008-07-24       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 10.  Hallmarks of cancer: the next generation.

Authors:  Douglas Hanahan; Robert A Weinberg
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2011-03-04       Impact factor: 41.582

View more
  4 in total

1.  A Ten-N6-Methyladenosine (m6A)-Modified Gene Signature Based on a Risk Score System Predicts Patient Prognosis in Rectum Adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Wei Huang; Gen Li; Zihang Wang; Lin Zhou; Xin Yin; Tianshu Yang; Pei Wang; Xu Teng; Yajuan Feng; Hefen Yu
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-02-17       Impact factor: 6.244

2.  Novel Model to Predict the Prognosis of Patients with Stage II-III Colon Cancer.

Authors:  Yansong Xu; Fangfang Liang; Yi Chen; Zhen Wang; Huage Zhong; Weizhong Tang
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2020-11-22       Impact factor: 3.411

3.  Machine Learning-based Model for Predicting Postoperative Complications among Patients with Colonic Perforation: A Retrospective study.

Authors:  Hiroka Hosaka; Masashi Takeuchi; Tomohiro Imoto; Haruka Yagishita; Ayaka Yu; Yusuke Maeda; Yosuke Kobayashi; Yoshie Kadota; Masanori Odaira; Fumiki Toriumi; Takashi Endo; Hirohisa Harada
Journal:  J Anus Rectum Colon       Date:  2021-07-29

4.  Glasgow prognostic score and combined positive score for locally advanced rectal cancer.

Authors:  Yanru Feng; Jialin Luo; Peng Liu; Luying Liu; Yuan Zhu; Guoping Cheng; Linfeng Zheng
Journal:  Ann Surg Treat Res       Date:  2022-03-04       Impact factor: 1.859

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.