Literature DB >> 27984214

Comparison of Preoperative Inflammation-based Prognostic Scores in Patients With Colorectal Cancer.

Yoshiyuki Suzuki1, Koji Okabayashi, Hirotoshi Hasegawa, Masashi Tsuruta, Kohei Shigeta, Takayuki Kondo, Yuko Kitagawa.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the prognostic impact of the systemic inflammation score (SIS) in colorectal cancer (CRC) patients in comparison with a conventional inflammation-based score, the modified Glasgow Prognostic Score (mGPS). SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: The SIS, which is calculated based on the preoperative serum albumin level and lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio, is a reported prognostic marker in clear-cell renal cell carcinoma. However, the utility of the SIS in CRC remains unclear.
METHODS: The study involved 727 CRC patients who underwent curative resection between September 2005 and December 2011. The prognostic impact of SIS and mGPS was evaluated using survival analyses. The prognostic impact of each score was compared visually by means of time-dependent receiver operating characteristics analysis.
RESULTS: The median age of the patients was 67 (interquartile range: 58-75) years. The TNM stage distribution was stage I, 29.8%; stage II, 33.6%; stage III, 30.3%; and stage IV, 6.3%. The median follow-up period was 5.61 years (interquartile range: 4.24-7.06). Multivariate analysis revealed that an increased SIS and mGPS were independent prognostic factors (SIS: P = 0.018; mGPS: P = 0.005, respectively). The time-dependent receiver operating characteristics curve of the SIS was superior to that of the mGPS throughout the observation period. The estimated area under the curve (AUC) of the SIS was significantly higher than that of the mGPS (7-yr survival: SIS 0.673, mGPS 0.605, P = 0.030).
CONCLUSIONS: The SIS is a novel prognostic factor in CRC patients. Additionally, the SIS is an alternative inflammation-based biomarker, which may improve the prediction of clinical outcomes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 27984214     DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000002115

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg        ISSN: 0003-4932            Impact factor:   12.969


  42 in total

1.  Prognostic impact of the combination of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio and Glasgow prognostic score in colorectal cancer: a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Susumu Inamoto; Kenji Kawada; Ryosuke Okamura; Koya Hida; Yoshiharu Sakai
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2019-06-08       Impact factor: 2.571

2.  Clinical significance of the C-reactive protein-to-albumin ratio for the prognosis of patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Masaki Kunizaki; Tetsuro Tominaga; Kouki Wakata; Takuro Miyazaki; Keitaro Matsumoto; Yorihisa Sumida; Shigekazu Hidaka; Takuya Yamasaki; Toru Yasutake; Terumitu Sawai; Ryuji Hamamoto; Atsushi Nanashima; Takeshi Nagayasu
Journal:  Mol Clin Oncol       Date:  2017-12-08

3.  The prognostic value of the systemic inflammatory score in patients with unresectable metastatic colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Masatsune Shibutani; Kiyoshi Maeda; Hisashi Nagahara; Tatsunari Fukuoka; Shinji Matsutani; Kenjiro Kimura; Ryosuke Amano; Kosei Hirakawa; Masaichi Ohira
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2018-05-04       Impact factor: 2.967

4.  Prognostic value of the preoperative prognostic nutritional index in oldest-old patients with colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Tetsuro Tominaga; Takashi Nonaka; Makoto Hisanaga; Akiko Fukuda; Yukinori Tanoue; Takafumi Yoshimoto; Shigekazu Hidaka; Terumitsu Sawai; Takeshi Nagayasu
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2019-11-12       Impact factor: 2.549

5.  The inflammation-nutrition score supports the prognostic prediction of the TNM stage for colorectal cancer patients after curative resection.

Authors:  Shiki Fujino; Norikatsu Myoshi; Kazuhiro Saso; Msaru Sasaki; Satoshi Ishikawa; Yusuke Takahashi; Masayoshi Yasui; Masayuki Ohue; Taishi Hata; Chu Matsuda; Tsunekazu Mizushima; Masaki Mori; Yuichiro Doki
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2019-08-14       Impact factor: 2.549

6.  Significance of Preoperative Systemic Inflammation Score in Short-Term and Long-Term Outcomes of Patients with Pathological T2-4 Gastric Cancer After Radical Gastrectomy.

Authors:  Bin Sato; Mitsuro Kanda; Chie Tanaka; Daisuke Kobayashi; Naoki Iwata; Norifumi Hattori; Masaya Suenaga; Masamichi Hayashi; Suguru Yamada; Kenta Murotani; Michitaka Fujiwara; Yasuhiro Kodera
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 3.352

7.  Prognostic significance of systemic inflammation score in patients who undergo hepatic resection for hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Shoichi Inokuchi; Shinji Itoh; Tomoharu Yoshizumi; Akinari Morinaga; Takeo Toshima; Kazuki Takeishi; Yoshihiro Nagao; Noboru Harada; Toru Ikegami; Mototsugu Shimokawa; Masaki Mori
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2021-02-17       Impact factor: 3.445

8.  Prognostic Value and Association of Sarcopenia and Systemic Inflammation for Patients with Gastric Cancer Following Radical Gastrectomy.

Authors:  Jian-Xian Lin; Jun-Peng Lin; Jian-Wei Xie; Jia-Bin Wang; Jun Lu; Qi-Yue Chen; Long-Long Cao; Mi Lin; Ruhong Tu; Chao-Hui Zheng; Chang-Ming Huang; Ping Li
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2019-03-25

9.  Prognostic value of serum inflammatory markers in colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Sung Chul Lee; Jung Wook Huh; Woo Yong Lee; Seong Hyeon Yun; Hee Cheol Kim; Yong Beom Cho; Yoon Ah Park; Jung Kyong Shin
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2020-04-18       Impact factor: 2.571

10.  Feasibility of esophagectomy for esophageal cancer in elderly patients: a case-control study.

Authors:  Nobuhiro Tsuchiya; Chikara Kunisaki; Sho Sato; Yusaku Tanaka; Kei Sato; Jun Watanabe; Kazuhisa Takeda; Takashi Kosaka; Hirotoshi Akiyama; Itaru Endo
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2021-07-14       Impact factor: 3.445

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.