Wei Huang1, Gen Li1, Zihang Wang2, Lin Zhou2, Xin Yin1, Tianshu Yang1, Pei Wang1, Xu Teng1, Yajuan Feng2, Hefen Yu1. 1. Beijing Key Laboratory of Cancer Invasion and Metastasis Research, Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China. 2. School of Information Science and Technology, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, China.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: The study aims to analyze the expression of N6-methyladenosine (m6A)-modified genes in rectum adenocarcinoma (READ) and identify reliable prognostic biomarkers to predict the prognosis of READ. MATERIALS AND METHODS: RNA sequence data of READ and corresponding clinical survival data were obtained from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) database. N6-methyladenosine (m6A)-modified genes in READ were downloaded from the "m6Avar" database. Differentially expressed m6A-modified genes in READ stratified by different clinicopathological characteristics were identified using the "limma" package in R. Protein-protein interaction (PPI) network and co-expression analysis of differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were performed using "STRING" and Cytoscape, respectively. Principal component analysis (PCA) was done using R. In addition, Gene Ontology (GO) and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathways were used to functionally annotate the differentially expressed genes in different subgroups. Univariate Cox regression analyses were conducted to identify the powerful independent prognostic factors in READ associated with overall survival (OS). A robust likelihood-based survival model was built using the "rbsurv" package to screen for survival-associated signature genes. The Support Vector Machine (SVM) was used to predict the prognosis of READ through the risk score of survival-associated signature genes. Correlation analysis were carried out using GraphPad prism 8. RESULTS: We screened 974 differentially expressed m6A-modified genes among four types of READ samples. Two READ subgroups (group 1 and group 2) were identified by K means clustering according to the expression of DEGs. The two subgroups were significantly different in overall survival and pathological stages. Next, 118 differentially expressed genes between the two subgroups were screened and the expression of 112 genes was found to be related to the prognosis of READ. Next, a panel of 10 survival-associated signature genes including adamtsl1, csmd2, fam13c, fam184a, klhl4, olfml2b, pdzd4, sec14l5, setbp1, tmem132b was constructed. The signature performed very well for prognosis prediction, time-dependent receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) analysis displaying an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.863, 0.8721, and 0.8752 for 3-year survival rate, prognostic status, and pathological stage prediction, respectively. Correlation analysis showed that the expression levels of the 10 m6A-modified genes were positively correlated with that of m6A demethylase FTO and ALKBH5. CONCLUSION: This study identified potential m6A-modified genes that may be involved in the pathophysiology of READ and constructed a novel gene expression panel for READ risk stratification and prognosis prediction.
OBJECTIVES: The study aims to analyze the expression of N6-methyladenosine (m6A)-modified genes in rectum adenocarcinoma (READ) and identify reliable prognostic biomarkers to predict the prognosis of READ. MATERIALS AND METHODS: RNA sequence data of READ and corresponding clinical survival data were obtained from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) database. N6-methyladenosine (m6A)-modified genes in READ were downloaded from the "m6Avar" database. Differentially expressed m6A-modified genes in READ stratified by different clinicopathological characteristics were identified using the "limma" package in R. Protein-protein interaction (PPI) network and co-expression analysis of differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were performed using "STRING" and Cytoscape, respectively. Principal component analysis (PCA) was done using R. In addition, Gene Ontology (GO) and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathways were used to functionally annotate the differentially expressed genes in different subgroups. Univariate Cox regression analyses were conducted to identify the powerful independent prognostic factors in READ associated with overall survival (OS). A robust likelihood-based survival model was built using the "rbsurv" package to screen for survival-associated signature genes. The Support Vector Machine (SVM) was used to predict the prognosis of READ through the risk score of survival-associated signature genes. Correlation analysis were carried out using GraphPad prism 8. RESULTS: We screened 974 differentially expressed m6A-modified genes among four types of READ samples. Two READ subgroups (group 1 and group 2) were identified by K means clustering according to the expression of DEGs. The two subgroups were significantly different in overall survival and pathological stages. Next, 118 differentially expressed genes between the two subgroups were screened and the expression of 112 genes was found to be related to the prognosis of READ. Next, a panel of 10 survival-associated signature genes including adamtsl1, csmd2, fam13c, fam184a, klhl4, olfml2b, pdzd4, sec14l5, setbp1, tmem132b was constructed. The signature performed very well for prognosis prediction, time-dependent receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) analysis displaying an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.863, 0.8721, and 0.8752 for 3-year survival rate, prognostic status, and pathological stage prediction, respectively. Correlation analysis showed that the expression levels of the 10 m6A-modified genes were positively correlated with that of m6A demethylase FTO and ALKBH5. CONCLUSION: This study identified potential m6A-modified genes that may be involved in the pathophysiology of READ and constructed a novel gene expression panel for READ risk stratification and prognosis prediction.
Authors: Junhong Choi; Ka-Weng Ieong; Hasan Demirci; Jin Chen; Alexey Petrov; Arjun Prabhakar; Seán E O'Leary; Dan Dominissini; Gideon Rechavi; S Michael Soltis; Måns Ehrenberg; Joseph D Puglisi Journal: Nat Struct Mol Biol Date: 2016-01-11 Impact factor: 15.369
Authors: Philip Knuckles; Tina Lence; Irmgard U Haussmann; Dominik Jacob; Nastasja Kreim; Sarah H Carl; Irene Masiello; Tina Hares; Rodrigo Villaseñor; Daniel Hess; Miguel A Andrade-Navarro; Marco Biggiogera; Mark Helm; Matthias Soller; Marc Bühler; Jean-Yves Roignant Journal: Genes Dev Date: 2018-03-13 Impact factor: 11.361
Authors: Ian A Roundtree; Guan-Zheng Luo; Zijie Zhang; Xiao Wang; Tao Zhou; Yiquang Cui; Jiahao Sha; Xingxu Huang; Laura Guerrero; Phil Xie; Emily He; Bin Shen; Chuan He Journal: Elife Date: 2017-10-06 Impact factor: 8.140