OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to propose an improved scan method to shorten irradiation time and reduce radiation exposure. METHODS: The maxilla of a human head CT phantom and a Catphan phantom were used for qualitative and quantitative assessment, respectively. The phantoms were scanned by a 160-row multidetector CT scanner using volumetric and helical scanning. In volumetric scanning, the tube current varied from 120 to 60 to 30 to 20 mA with a tube voltage of 120 kV. Images were reconstructed with a bone kernel using iterative reconstruction (IR) and filtered back projection. As a reference protocol, helical scanning was performed using our clinical setting with 120 kV. Two dental radiologists independently graded the quality of dental images using a 4-point scale (4, superior to reference; 1, unacceptable). For the quantitative assessment, we assessed the system performance from each scan. RESULTS: There was no significant difference between the image quality of volumetric scanning using the 60 mA protocol reconstructed with IR and that of the reference (3.08 and 3.00, p = 0.3388). The system performance values at 1.0 cycles/mm of volumetric scanning and 60 mA protocol reconstructed with IR and reference were 0.0038 and 0.0041, respectively. The effective dose of volumetric scanning using the 60 mA protocol was 51.8 µSv, which is a 64.2% reduction to that of the reference. CONCLUSIONS: We proposed an improved scan method resulting in a 64.2% reduction of radiation dose with one-fourth of irradiation time by combining volumetric scanning and IR technique in multidetector CT.
OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to propose an improved scan method to shorten irradiation time and reduce radiation exposure. METHODS: The maxilla of a human head CT phantom and a Catphan phantom were used for qualitative and quantitative assessment, respectively. The phantoms were scanned by a 160-row multidetector CT scanner using volumetric and helical scanning. In volumetric scanning, the tube current varied from 120 to 60 to 30 to 20 mA with a tube voltage of 120 kV. Images were reconstructed with a bone kernel using iterative reconstruction (IR) and filtered back projection. As a reference protocol, helical scanning was performed using our clinical setting with 120 kV. Two dental radiologists independently graded the quality of dental images using a 4-point scale (4, superior to reference; 1, unacceptable). For the quantitative assessment, we assessed the system performance from each scan. RESULTS: There was no significant difference between the image quality of volumetric scanning using the 60 mA protocol reconstructed with IR and that of the reference (3.08 and 3.00, p = 0.3388). The system performance values at 1.0 cycles/mm of volumetric scanning and 60 mA protocol reconstructed with IR and reference were 0.0038 and 0.0041, respectively. The effective dose of volumetric scanning using the 60 mA protocol was 51.8 µSv, which is a 64.2% reduction to that of the reference. CONCLUSIONS: We proposed an improved scan method resulting in a 64.2% reduction of radiation dose with one-fourth of irradiation time by combining volumetric scanning and IR technique in multidetector CT.
Authors: Mannudeep K Kalra; Mischa Woisetschläger; Nils Dahlström; Sarabjeet Singh; Maria Lindblom; Garry Choy; Petter Quick; Bernhard Schmidt; Martin Sedlmair; Michael A Blake; Anders Persson Journal: J Comput Assist Tomogr Date: 2012 May-Jun Impact factor: 1.826
Authors: Simon Veldhoen; Maximilian Schöllchen; H Hanken; C Precht; F O Henes; G Schön; H D Nagel; U Schumacher; M Heiland; G Adam; M Regier Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2016-05-11 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Mark S Pearce; Jane A Salotti; Mark P Little; Kieran McHugh; Choonsik Lee; Kwang Pyo Kim; Nicola L Howe; Cecile M Ronckers; Preetha Rajaraman; Alan W Sir Craft; Louise Parker; Amy Berrington de González Journal: Lancet Date: 2012-06-07 Impact factor: 79.321