Literature DB >> 32299956

Influence of bedspacing on outcomes of hospitalised medicine service patients: a retrospective cohort study.

Rachel Kohn1,2,3, Michael O Harhay4,2,3,5, Brian Bayes2, Hummy Song3,6, Scott D Halpern4,2,3,5,7, Meeta Prasad Kerlin4,2,3, S Ryan Greysen4,3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Specialty wards cohort hospitalised patients to improve outcomes and lower costs. When demand exceeds capacity, patients overflow and are "bedspaced" to alternate wards. Some studies have demonstrated that bedspacing among medicine service patients is associated with adverse patient-centred outcomes, however, results have been inconsistent and have primarily been performed within national health systems. The objective of this study was to assess the association of bedspacing with patient-centred outcomes among United States patients admitted to general medicine services.
METHODS: We performed a retrospective cohort study of internal medicine, family medicine and geriatric service patients who were bedspaced vs cohorted for the entirety of their hospital stay within three large, urban United States hospitals (quaternary referral centre, tertiary referral centre and community hospital, with different patient demographics and case-mixes) in 2014 and 2015. We performed quantile regression to determine differences in length of stay (LOS) between bedspaced vs cohorted patients and logistic regression for in-hospital mortality and discharge to home.
RESULTS: Among 18 802 patients in 33 wards, 6119 (33%) patients were bedspaced. Bedspaced patients had significantly longer LOS compared with cohorted patients at the 25th (0.1 days, 95% CI: 0.05 to 0.2, p=0.001), 50th (0.2 days, 95% CI: 0.1 to 0.3, p=0.003) and 75th (0.3 days, 95% CI: 0.2 to 0.5, p<0.001) percentiles; and no statistically significant differences in odds of mortality (OR=0.9, 95% CI: 0.6 to 1.3, p=0.5) or discharge to home (OR=0.9, 95% CI: 0.9 to 1.0, p=0.06) in adjusted analyses.
CONCLUSION: Bedspacing is associated with adverse patient-centred outcomes. Future work is needed to confirm these findings, understand mechanisms contributing to adverse outcomes and identify factors that mitigate these adverse effects in order to provide high-value, patient-centred care to hospitalised patients. © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

Entities:  

Keywords:  health services research; healthcare quality improvement; hospital medicine; management

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32299956      PMCID: PMC7572738          DOI: 10.1136/bmjqs-2019-010675

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMJ Qual Saf        ISSN: 2044-5415            Impact factor:   7.035


  19 in total

1.  Comparison of Care Patterns and Rehospitalizations for Mechanically Ventilated Patients in New York and Ontario.

Authors:  Hannah Wunsch; Andrea D Hill; Damon C Scales; Robert A Fowler; May Hua
Journal:  Ann Am Thorac Soc       Date:  2019-04

2.  Hospital mortality, length of stay, and preventable complications among critically ill patients before and after tele-ICU reengineering of critical care processes.

Authors:  Craig M Lilly; Shawn Cody; Huifang Zhao; Karen Landry; Stephen P Baker; John McIlwaine; M Willis Chandler; Richard S Irwin
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2011-05-16       Impact factor: 56.272

3.  Discharge before noon: an achievable hospital goal.

Authors:  Benjamin Wertheimer; Ramon E A Jacobs; Martha Bailey; Sandy Holstein; Steven Chatfield; Brenda Ohta; Amy Horrocks; Katherine Hochman
Journal:  J Hosp Med       Date:  2014-01-20       Impact factor: 2.960

4.  Patient safety in patients who occupy beds on clinically inappropriate wards: a qualitative interview study with NHS staff.

Authors:  Lucy Goulding; Joy Adamson; Ian Watt; John Wright
Journal:  BMJ Qual Saf       Date:  2011-11-18       Impact factor: 7.035

5.  Discharge before noon: Effect on throughput and sustainability.

Authors:  Benjamin Wertheimer; Ramon E A Jacobs; Eduardo Iturrate; Martha Bailey; Katherine Hochman
Journal:  J Hosp Med       Date:  2015-06-30       Impact factor: 2.960

Review 6.  Variation in critical care services across North America and Western Europe.

Authors:  Hannah Wunsch; Derek C Angus; David A Harrison; Olivier Collange; Robert Fowler; Eric A J Hoste; Nicolette F de Keizer; Alexander Kersten; Walter T Linde-Zwirble; Alberto Sandiumenge; Kathryn M Rowan
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 7.598

7.  Does sepsis treatment differ between primary and overflow intensive care units?

Authors:  Kittane Vishnupriya; Olufunmilayo Falade; Addisu Workneh; Satish Chandolu; Regina Landis; Kaweesa Elizabeth; Reethi Iyengar; Scott Wright; Jonathan Sevransky
Journal:  J Hosp Med       Date:  2012-08-03       Impact factor: 2.960

8.  Impact of delayed transfer of critically ill patients from the emergency department to the intensive care unit.

Authors:  Donald B Chalfin; Stephen Trzeciak; Antonios Likourezos; Brigitte M Baumann; R Phillip Dellinger
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 7.598

9.  Are medical outliers associated with worse patient outcomes? A retrospective study within a regional NHS hospital using routine data.

Authors:  Neophytos Stylianou; Robin Fackrell; Christos Vasilakis
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2017-05-09       Impact factor: 2.692

10.  Lost in hospital: a qualitative interview study that explores the perceptions of NHS inpatients who spent time on clinically inappropriate hospital wards.

Authors:  Lucy Goulding; Joy Adamson; Ian Watt; John Wright
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2013-04-24       Impact factor: 3.377

View more
  1 in total

1.  High ward occupancy, bedspacing, and 60 day mortality for patients with myocardial infarction, stroke, and heart failure.

Authors:  Andreas Asheim; Sara Marie Nilsen; Stina Aam; Kjartan Sarheim Anthun; Fredrik Carlsen; Imre Janszky; Lars Johan Vatten; Johan Håkon Bjørngaard
Journal:  ESC Heart Fail       Date:  2022-03-28
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.