Lucy Goulding1, Joy Adamson1, Ian Watt2, John Wright3. 1. Department of Health Sciences, University of York, UK. 2. Department of Health Sciences/Hull York Medical School, University of York, York, UK. 3. Bradford Institute for Health Research, Bradford, UK.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Prior research suggests that the placement of patients on clinically inappropriate hospital wards may increase the risk of experiencing patient safety issues. OBJECTIVE: To explore patients' perspectives of the quality and safety of the care received during their inpatient stay on a clinically inappropriate hospital ward. DESIGN: Qualitative study using semi-structured interviews. PARTICIPANTS AND SETTING: Nineteen patients who had spent time on at least one clinically inappropriate ward during their hospital stay at a large NHS teaching hospital in England. RESULTS: Patients would prefer to be treated on the correct specialty ward, but it is generally accepted that this may not be possible. When patients are placed on inappropriate wards, they may lack a sense of belonging. Participants commented on potential failings in communication, medical staff availability, nurses' knowledge and the resources available, each of which may contribute to unsafe care. CONCLUSIONS: Patients generally acknowledge the need for placement on inappropriate wards due to demand for inpatient beds, but may report dissatisfaction in terms of preference and belonging. Importantly, patients recount issues resulting from this placement that may compromise their safety. Hospital managers should be encouraged to appreciate this insight and potential threat to safe practice and where possible avoid inappropriate ward transfers and admissions. Where such admissions are unavoidable, staff should take action to address the gaps in safety of care that have been identified.
BACKGROUND: Prior research suggests that the placement of patients on clinically inappropriate hospital wards may increase the risk of experiencing patient safety issues. OBJECTIVE: To explore patients' perspectives of the quality and safety of the care received during their inpatient stay on a clinically inappropriate hospital ward. DESIGN: Qualitative study using semi-structured interviews. PARTICIPANTS AND SETTING: Nineteen patients who had spent time on at least one clinically inappropriate ward during their hospital stay at a large NHS teaching hospital in England. RESULTS: Patients would prefer to be treated on the correct specialty ward, but it is generally accepted that this may not be possible. When patients are placed on inappropriate wards, they may lack a sense of belonging. Participants commented on potential failings in communication, medical staff availability, nurses' knowledge and the resources available, each of which may contribute to unsafe care. CONCLUSIONS: Patients generally acknowledge the need for placement on inappropriate wards due to demand for inpatient beds, but may report dissatisfaction in terms of preference and belonging. Importantly, patients recount issues resulting from this placement that may compromise their safety. Hospital managers should be encouraged to appreciate this insight and potential threat to safe practice and where possible avoid inappropriate ward transfers and admissions. Where such admissions are unavoidable, staff should take action to address the gaps in safety of care that have been identified.
Authors: Vikki A Entwistle; Dorothy McCaughan; Ian S Watt; Yvonne Birks; Jill Hall; Maggie Peat; Brian Williams; John Wright Journal: Qual Saf Health Care Date: 2010-12
Authors: Emanuela Estera Boncea; Paul Expert; Kate Honeyford; Anne Kinderlerer; Colin Mitchell; Graham S Cooke; Luca Mercuri; Céire E Costelloe Journal: BMJ Qual Saf Date: 2021-01-25 Impact factor: 7.035
Authors: Rachel Kohn; Michael O Harhay; Brian Bayes; Hummy Song; Scott D Halpern; Meeta Prasad Kerlin; S Ryan Greysen Journal: BMJ Qual Saf Date: 2020-04-16 Impact factor: 7.035