Literature DB >> 18766102

Variation in critical care services across North America and Western Europe.

Hannah Wunsch1, Derek C Angus, David A Harrison, Olivier Collange, Robert Fowler, Eric A J Hoste, Nicolette F de Keizer, Alexander Kersten, Walter T Linde-Zwirble, Alberto Sandiumenge, Kathryn M Rowan.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Critical care represents a large percentage of healthcare spending in developed countries. Yet, little is known regarding international variation in critical care services. We sought to understand differences in critical care delivery by comparing data on the distribution of services in eight countries.
DESIGN: Retrospective review of existing national administrative data. We identified sources of data in each country to provide information on acute care hospitals and beds, intensive care units and beds, intensive care admissions, and definitions of intensive care beds. Data were all referenced and from as close to 2005 as possible.
SETTING: United States, France, United Kingdom, Canada, Belgium, Germany, The Netherlands, and Spain. PATIENTS: Not available.
INTERVENTIONS: None.
MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: No standard definition existed for acute care hospital or intensive care unit beds across countries. Hospital beds varied three-fold from 221/100,000 population in the United States to 593/100,000 in Germany. Adult intensive care unit beds also ranged seven-fold from 3.3/100,000 population in the United Kingdom to 24.0/100,000 in Germany. Volume of intensive care unit admissions per year varied ten-fold from 216/100,000 population in the United Kingdom to 2353/100,000 in Germany. The ratio of intensive care unit beds to hospital beds was highly correlated across all countries except the United States (r = .90). There was minimal correlation between the number of intensive care unit beds per capita and health care spending per capita (r = .45), but high inverse correlation between intensive care unit beds and hospital mortality for intensive care unit patients across countries (r = -.82).
CONCLUSIONS: Absolute critical care services vary dramatically between countries with wide differences in both numbers of beds and volume of admissions. The number of intensive care unit beds per capita is not strongly correlated with overall health expenditure, but does correlate strongly with mortality. These findings demonstrate the need for critical care data from all countries, as they are essential for interpretation of studies, and policy decisions regarding critical care services.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18766102     DOI: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e318186aec8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Crit Care Med        ISSN: 0090-3493            Impact factor:   7.598


  198 in total

1.  [Intensive care capacities in Germany: provision and usage between 1991 and 2009].

Authors:  R Thattil; D Klepzig; M Schuster
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 1.041

2.  The ALIEN study: incidence and outcome of acute respiratory distress syndrome in the era of lung protective ventilation.

Authors:  Jesús Villar; Jesús Blanco; José Manuel Añón; Antonio Santos-Bouza; Lluís Blanch; Alfonso Ambrós; Francisco Gandía; Demetrio Carriedo; Fernando Mosteiro; Santiago Basaldúa; Rosa Lidia Fernández; Robert M Kacmarek
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2011-10-14       Impact factor: 17.440

3.  The variability of critical care bed numbers in Europe.

Authors:  A Rhodes; P Ferdinande; H Flaatten; B Guidet; P G Metnitz; R P Moreno
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2012-07-10       Impact factor: 17.440

4.  Should cost considerations be included in medical decisions? Not so sure….

Authors:  Maurizia Capuzzo; Andrew Rhodes
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2015-07-28       Impact factor: 17.440

5.  Clinical and investigative critical care medicine in Japan.

Authors:  Nobuaki Shime
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2016-01-13       Impact factor: 17.440

6.  ICU structures and organization: putting together all the pieces of a very complex puzzle.

Authors:  Andrew Rhodes; Rui P Moreno; Jean-Daniel Chiche
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2011-09-15       Impact factor: 17.440

7.  Recommendations on basic requirements for intensive care units: structural and organizational aspects.

Authors:  Andreas Valentin; Patrick Ferdinande
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2011-09-15       Impact factor: 17.440

8.  Intensive care unit admission in multiple sclerosis: increased incidence and increased mortality.

Authors:  Ruth Ann Marrie; Charles N Bernstein; Christine A Peschken; Carol A Hitchon; Hui Chen; Randy Fransoo; Allan Garland
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2014-05-07       Impact factor: 9.910

9.  The impact of the organization of high-dependency care on acute hospital mortality and patient flow for critically ill patients.

Authors:  Hannah Wunsch; David A Harrison; Andrew Jones; Kathryn Rowan
Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med       Date:  2015-01-15       Impact factor: 21.405

10.  Routine Admission to Intensive Care Unit After Cytoreductive Surgery and Heated Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy: Not Always a Requirement.

Authors:  Harveshp D Mogal; Edward A Levine; Nora F Fino; Chukwuemeka Obiora; Perry Shen; John H Stewart; Konstantinos I Votanopoulos
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2015-11-16       Impact factor: 5.344

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.