| Literature DB >> 32299433 |
Liangsen Liu1,2,3, Fangzhong Wang1,2,4, Guangsheng Pei1,2,3, Jinyu Cui1,2,3, Jinjin Diao1,2,3, Mingming Lv1,2,3, Lei Chen1,2,3, Weiwen Zhang5,6,7,8.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) is essential for human diet. However, high production cost of DHA using C. cohnii makes it currently less competitive commercially, which is mainly caused by low DHA productivity. In recent years, repeated fed-batch strategies have been evaluated for increasing the production of many fermentation products. The reduction in terms of stability of culture system was one of the major challenges for repeated fed-batch fermentation. However, the possible mechanisms responsible for the decreased stability of the culture system in the repeated fed-batch fermentation are so far less investigated, restricting the efforts to further improve the productivity. In this study, a repeated fed-batch strategy for DHA production using C. cohnii M-1-2 was evaluated to improve DHA productivity and reduce production cost, and then the underlying mechanisms related to the gradually decreased stability of the culture system in repeated fed-batch culture were explored through LC- and GC-MS metabolomic analyses.Entities:
Keywords: Crypthecodinium cohnii; Docosahexaenoic acid; Metabolomic; Productivity; Repeated fed-batch culture; Stability
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32299433 PMCID: PMC7164216 DOI: 10.1186/s12934-020-01349-6
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Microb Cell Fact ISSN: 1475-2859 Impact factor: 5.328
Fig. 1Repeated fed-batch cultivation of two cycles under different glucose concentrations at 25 °C and pH 6.5. a Repeated fed-batch culture with initial glucose monohydrate concentration 27 g/L and maintenance concentration 5–15 g/L of glucose; b Repeated fed-batch culture with initial glucose monohydrate concentration 27 g/L and maintenance concentration 15–27 g/L of glucose; c Repeated fed-batch culture with initial glucose monohydrate concentration 45 g/L and maintenance concentration 27–45 g/L of glucose
Comparison of DHA production at the end of each cycle using different glucose concentrations
| Glucose Conc. (g/L) | Cycle | Fermentation time (h) | Dry cell weight (g/L) | DHA (g/L) | DHA productivitya (mg/L/h) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5.00–15.00 | Cycle 1 | 120 | 30.38 ± 0.12 | 3.41 ± 0.03 | 28.44 ± 0.24 |
| 5.00–15.00 | Cycle 2 | 120 | 26.72 ± 0.49 | 2.99 ± 0.01 | 24.93 ± 0.10 |
| 15.00–27.00 | Cycle 1 | 120 | 45.17 ± 0.71 | 5.42 ± 0.02 | 45.14 ± 0.15 |
| 15.00–27.00 | Cycle 2 | 120 | 43.57 ± 1.37 | 5.14 ± 0.04 | 42.84 ± 0.30 |
| 27.00–45.00 | Cycle 1 | 120 | 34.69 ± 0.35 | 3.90 ± 0.01 | 32.54 ± 0.12 |
| 27.00–45.00 | Cycle 2 | 120 | 40.62 ± 0.63 | 4.25 ± 0.03 | 35.40 ± 0.25 |
aDHA productivity of each cycle (the DHA produced at the end of each cycle/the time of each cycle operation)
Fig. 3DHA content (% DCW, w/w) in repeated fed-batch cultivation of two and four cycles. a DHA content of two cycles under different glucose concentrations. The DHA content in cycle 1 was set as 100% under different glucose concentrations respectively, and the percentage changes in cycle 2 were shown; b DHA content of two cycles under different medium replacement ratios. The DHA content in cycle 2 under medium replacement ratio of 90% was set as 100%, and the percentage changes in cycle 2 under medium replacement ratio of 80% and 70% were shown; c DHA content of four cycles. The DHA content in cycle 1 was set as 100%, and the percentage changes in other cycles were shown. Asterisks indicated significant differences, as evaluated by a statistical Student’s T-test (*p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001)
Comparison of DHA production by repeated fed-batch culture using different medium replacement ratios
| Replacement ratio (%) | Cycle | Fermentation time (h) | Dry cell weight (g/L) | DHA (g/L) | DHA productivity (mg/L/h) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 90a | Cycle 2 | 120 | 43.57 ± 1.37 | 5.14 ± 0.04 | 42.84 ± 0.30 |
| 80 | Cycle 2 | 120 | 45.84 ± 0.52 | 5.43 ± 0.02 | 45.28 ± 0.13 |
| 70 | Cycle 2 | 120 | 41.24 ± 0.78 | 4.34 ± 0.15 | 36.13 ± 1.29 |
aThe results were from Table 1
Fig. 2Repeated fed-batch cultivation of four cycles for DHA production at 25 °C and pH 6.5
Comparison of DHA production of each cycle in repeated fed-batch culture of four cycles
| Repeated fed-batch | Fermentation time (h) | Dry cell weight (g/L) | DHA (g/L) | DHA productivity (mg/L/h) | Fatty acid composition (%)a | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| C12:0 | C14:0 | C16:0 | C18:0 | C18:1 | C22:6 | |||||
| Cycle 1 | 120 | 46.80 ± 0.87 | 6.18 ± 0.01 | 51.54 ± 0.06 | 3.08 ± 0.36 | 14.28 ± 1.13 | 18.77 ± 0.56 | 2.58 ± 0.36 | 12.18 ± 0.18 | 49.12 ± 2.04 |
| Cycle 2 | 120 | 45.98 ± 0.24 | 6.05 ± 0.03 | 50.43 ± 0.22 | 3.74 ± 0.26 | 14.00 ± 0.20 | 19.45 ± 0.18 | 2.19 ± 0.03 | 11.61 ± 0.23 | 49.02 ± 0.50 |
| Cycle 3 | 120 | 46.48 ± 0.29 | 6.11 ± 0.06 | 50.94 ± 0.54 | 3.88 ± 0.04 | 12.95 ± 0.84 | 19.16 ± 0.93 | 2.85 ± 0.36 | 12.09 ± 0.36 | 49.06 ± 1.48 |
| Cycle 4 | 120 | 44.76 ± 0.08* | 5.88 ± 0.08 | 48.97 ± 0.64 | 3.58 ± 0.35 | 12.82 ± 0.58 | 20.25 ± 0.38 | 3.43 ± 0.73 | 11.40 ± 0.34 | 48.53 ± 0.49 |
aLauric acid (C12:0). Myristic acid (C14:0). Palmitic acid (C16:0). Stearic acid (C18:0). Oleic acid (C18:1). Docosahexaenoic acid (C22:6)
* Significant differences between cycle 4 and cycle 1 evaluated by a statistical Student’s T-test (*p < 0.05)
Comparison of DHA productivity using C. cohnii by different culture strategies
| Culture strategy | Carbon source | Fermentation time (h) | DHA productivity (mg/L/h) | References | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fed-batch | CCMP 316 | Glucose | 135 | 9.78 | [ |
| Batch | ATCC 30772 | Glucose | 91 | 17.58 | [ |
| Fed-batch | CCMP 316 | Carob pulp | 100 | 19.00 | [ |
| Fed-batch | ATCC 30556 | Date syrup | 240 | 23.54 | [ |
| Fed-batch | ATCC 30772 | Acetic acid | 400 | 47.50 | [ |
| Fed-batch | ATCC 30772 | Ethanol | 220 | 53.18 | [ |
| Fed-batch | M-1-2 | Glucose | 168 | 57.08 | [ |
| Repeated fed-batch cycle 1 | M-1-2 | Glucose | 120 | 51.54 | This study |
| Repeated fed-batch cycle 2 | M-1-2 | Glucose | 120 | 50.43 | This study |
| Repeated fed-batch cycle 3 | M-1-2 | Glucose | 120 | 50.94 | This study |
| Repeated fed-batch cycle 4 | M-1-2 | Glucose | 120 | 48.97 | This study |
Fig. 4Heatmaps of LC–MS metabolomic profiles of repeated fed-batch cultivation with 4 cycles. a 60 h; b 96 h. The first number represents the number of cycles and the third number represents biological replicates of 1–60 h-1
Fig. 5PCA of GC–MS metabolomic profiles of repeated fed-batch cultivation with 4 cycles. The first and second number labeled on top right legends (e.g. cycle 1–60 h) represent the number of cycle and cultivation time, respectively
Fig. 6Network visualization of the WGCNA analysis. a Module–trait associations. Each row and column representing a module eigen-metabolite or a trait respectively, the first column to time and the second column to cycle; b The visualization of top 10 most highly connected metabolites from blue module under the topological overlap threshold at 0.48; c The visualization of top 10 most highly connected metabolites from turquoise module under the topological overlap threshold at 0.62