Literature DB >> 32298035

Managing head and neck cancer patients with tracheostomy or laryngectomy during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Maxwell P Kligerman1,2, Neelaysh Vukkadala1,2, Raymond K Y Tsang3, John B Sunwoo1, F Christopher Holsinger1, Jason Y K Chan4, Edward J Damrose1,2, Ann Kearney2, Heather M Starmer1.   

Abstract

Head and neck cancer patients with tracheostomies and laryngectomies, as well as their healthcare providers, face unique challenges in the context of the current COVID-19 pandemic. This document consolidates best available evidence to date and presents recommendations to minimize the risks of aerosolization and SARS-CoV-2 exposures in both the inpatient and outpatient settings. The cornerstones of these recommendations include the use of closed-circuit ventilation whenever possible, cuffed tracheostomy tubes, judicious use of heat moisture exchange units, appropriate personal protective equipment for providers and patients, meticulous hand hygiene, and minimal manipulation of tracheostomy tubes.
© 2020 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Aerosolization; COVID-19; Laryngectomy; SARS-CoV-2; Tracheostomy

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32298035      PMCID: PMC7262107          DOI: 10.1002/hed.26171

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Head Neck        ISSN: 1043-3074            Impact factor:   3.147


INTRODUCTION

The COVID‐19 pandemic has created unprecedented new challenges for the health care system, including a unique set of challenges for patients with head and neck cancer. Although multiple prior studies have outlined indications and risk mitigation strategies for tracheotomy in patients with COVID‐19, there remains no clear consensus for inpatient and outpatient management of head and neck cancer patients with tracheostomy and/or total laryngectomy (TL) during the pandemic.1, 2, 3 Given the highly contagious nature of the virus from respiratory droplets and aerosolization, patients with tracheostomy and TL have a particularly high risk of transmission to others and merit special attention in terms of strategies to minimize viral spread. Although elective surgery across the United States has come to a halt, urgent and emergent tracheostomy and TL continue for patients with head and neck cancer. Unlike in patients with traditional acute respiratory distress syndrome, practices emerging from China where the pandemic began suggest that long‐term intubation alone should not be a justification for tracheostomy in SARS‐CoV‐2‐positive patients. However, there are tens of thousands of head and neck cancer patients with long‐standing tracheostomy and TL who continue to require medical care in both the inpatient and outpatient contexts. This commentary compiles the best available evidence to provide recommendations aimed at minimizing transmission of COVID‐19 when caring for head and neck cancer patients with tracheostomies and TL. Policies are bound to vary by institution and specific patient requirements and available resources. Global transparent communication may help to reduce risk to health care workers and improve outcomes for individual patients and societies facing this unprecedented pandemic.

RISK OF AEROSOLIZATION AND DROPLET FORMATION IN PATIENTS WITH TRACHEOSTOMY

COVID‐19 can spread by direct contact, droplet, and likely also aerosolization.4, 8, 9 Aerosolization refers to the process by which small particles are formed and dispersed in the air. It is important to distinguish aerosolization from droplet formation, which refers to the process by which fluids in the form of large droplets come into direct contact with another person thereby causing infection. In contrast to droplets, aerosolized SARS‐CoV‐2 does not require personal contact with the source patient and has been shown to remain viable in the air for upwards of 3 hours. For this reason, procedures or patient groups with increased risk of aerosolization may significantly increase viral transmission.11, 12 Some common procedures known to lead to aerosolization include intubation, tracheotomy, airway suctioning, nebulizer treatments, manipulation of oxygen masks, and noninvasive positive pressure ventilation.13, 14 It remains unclear exactly how much and how often patients with tracheostomy and TL are aerosolizing. The amount likely differs based on unique patient factors. Based on data from the 2013 SARS‐CoV‐1 outbreak and early data from the current COVID‐19 pandemic, it is likely that patients with fresh tracheostomy or TL are at significantly higher risk of spreading viral particles compared to other patients given high rates of aerosolizing procedures and equipment, including suctioning requirements, nebulizer treatments, open stomas, and open humidification with trach collar.11, 15, 16 In addition to the risk of aerosolization, there is also an increased risk of droplet formation given frequent productive coughing in recent surgical patients. Given the increased risk of aerosolization and droplet formation in conjunction with the high rates of undocumented infections and asymptomatic carriers, precautions for all patients with tracheostomy and TL may be indicated.

RISK REDUCTION STRATEGIES

Flow charts of strategies aimed at minimizing risk of transmission are shown in Figures 1 and 2. The cornerstones of these recommendations include the use of closed‐circuit ventilation whenever possible, cuffed tracheostomy tubes, judicious use of heat moisture exchange units (HMEs) as tolerated, appropriate personal protective equipment (PPE) for providers and patients at all times, and minimal manipulation of tracheostomy tubes. These strategies are described in the following section in more detail.
FIGURE 1

Outpatient guidelines for patients with tracheostomies or laryngectomies

FIGURE 2

Inpatient guidelines for patients with tracheostomies or laryngectomies

Outpatient guidelines for patients with tracheostomies or laryngectomies Inpatient guidelines for patients with tracheostomies or laryngectomies

Closed circuit ventilation with in‐line suction

Closed circuit ventilation, particularly in cases of known or suspected COVID‐19, may decrease the risk of aerosolization and droplet formation. Cuffed tracheostomy tubes should be used in these circumstances to decrease leaks in the circuit. Use of in‐line suction, even for patients who may not require chronic closed‐circuit ventilation, may also decrease risk of aerosolization and droplets (Figure 3). Nebulizer treatments should be avoided or used with caution as well to minimize risk of aerosolization.
FIGURE 3

Example configuration for in‐line suction without positive pressure ventilation. Figure A demonstrates a two‐valve adapter; Figure B demonstrates an HME on one valve (black arrow) and suction on the other (blue arrow) [Color figure can be viewed at http://wileyonlinelibrary.com]

Example configuration for in‐line suction without positive pressure ventilation. Figure A demonstrates a two‐valve adapter; Figure B demonstrates an HME on one valve (black arrow) and suction on the other (blue arrow) [Color figure can be viewed at http://wileyonlinelibrary.com]

Heat moisture exchange units

Heat moisture exchange units (HMEs) may reduce both aerosolization and droplet formation. Whenever tolerated, HMEs should be used instead of open tracheostomy collar with humidified air. Atos Medical has recently developed the Provox Micron HME filter that may be a helpful option for patients with suspected or confirmed COVID‐19. While efficacy for COVID‐19 has not specifically been tested, previous viral filtration efficacy was demonstrated to be 99%. Although the Micron was initially designed for patients following laryngectomy, it may be used with a 15‐mm hub adaptor for patients with tracheostomy. Standard HMEs without viral filtration may be used for patients without known infection or symptoms. Cuffed tracheostomy tubes are ideal for SARS‐CoV‐2‐positive patients as they may decrease leak around the HME and tracheostomy tube and can decrease airflow through the oropharynx and nasopharynx. However, these potential benefits must be balanced against the increased suction requirements while the cuff is up as patients will be less able to self‐clear secretions.

Appropriate use of PPE

PPE is essential to mitigate the risk of transmission.19, 20 Proper fit testing is essential for effective filtration with N95 masks. For all patients with tracheostomy/TL who are known to be SARS‐CoV‐2 positive or under investigation, the clinician should wear appropriate aerosolization PPE, including at a minimum an N95 mask, face shield, gown, and gloves at all times. For patients who are asymptomatic and/or SARS‐CoV‐2 negative, providers should at minimum wear droplet precaution PPE, including a surgical mask with face shield, gown, and gloves at all times while in the room. If there are any procedures that may lead to aerosolization (ie, trach change and/or suctioning without an inline suction), then the provider should wear aerosolization PPE, including an N95 respirator, regardless of patient SARS‐CoV‐2 status due to unknown false‐negative COVID PCR testing rates at this time and high rates of asymptomatic carriers. Removal of PPE after exposure to an individual infected with COVID is one of the highest risk periods for contamination. Apart from provision of PPE, prior training of proper gown up and gown down of PPE must be provided to all health care workers involved in caring for patients with suspected or confirmed SARS‐CoV‐2. All staff should be vigilant in adhering to the gown up and gown down protocol. Patients should also wear PPE to decrease risk of transmission. Any patient known to be SARS‐CoV‐2 positive or under investigation should wear a surgical mask over nose and mouth, regardless of tracheostomy/TL status. Patients not on a closed ventilation circuit should also wear a surgical mask over their stoma if tolerated as this may decrease spread of droplets from leakage around the stoma and/or HME. Any SARS‐CoV‐2‐negative or asymptomatic patients who are immunocompromised (ie, patients receiving active chemotherapy, active radiation, active immunotherapy, with a history of lung transplant, less than 1 year status post solid organ or bone marrow transplant, or with neutropenia) should wear a mask over the nose and mouth at all times while in the health care setting to decrease their own risk of becoming infected.

Hygiene

Although the importance of hand hygiene to minimize transmission is well established, patients with tracheostomy and TL have some special considerations. Apart from acquiring the virus from inhalation of droplets infected with the virus, tracheostomy and TL patients may become infected if their hands contaminated with the virus touch the respiratory mucosa of the tracheostoma. Thorough hand hygiene should be performed immediately prior to and following any contact with the tracheostomy or laryngectomy stoma. Patients who use a tracheoesophageal voice prosthesis (TEP) should use an HME interface for voicing to minimize hand to stoma contact. Patients using an electrolarynx should clean their device frequently with disinfectant wipes and those using a pneumatic tube or Taiwan tube artificial larynx should clean the device with hydrogen peroxide following each use.

Minimize exposures and procedures

All nonurgent procedures that can be reasonably delayed (ie, elective tracheostomy tube change or TEP exchange) should be postponed and manipulation of the tracheostomy and/or laryngectomy site should be minimized. TEP leakage may be managed by the temporary use of a plug or thickened liquids when possible. Similarly, all nonurgent clinic visits should be postponed and/or converted to telehealth visits when possible. The absolute minimum number of providers required to safely care for and evaluate each patient should be used.

SARS‐CoV‐2 screening

When PCR testing for the virus becomes more widely available in the surgeon's practice, preoperative testing for all patients scheduled for tracheostomy and/or TL should be strongly considered. There may also be a role for SARS‐CoV2 testing for patients with tracheostomy or TL who are admitted to the inpatient setting for an extended period of time, but this may vary based on the individual patient's risk, hospital setting, and other considerations such as endemic risk.

CONCLUSIONS

Head and neck cancer patients with tracheostomy and TL as well as their health care providers face unique challenges in the context of the current COVID‐19 pandemic. Although practices and recommendations are bound to evolve over time, this document may serve as a foundation for future efforts to help minimize the risk of aerosolization and SARS‐CoV‐2 exposures.
  17 in total

1.  Images in clinical medicine. Coughing and aerosols.

Authors:  Julian W Tang; Gary S Settles
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2008-10-09       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  A pneumatic artificial larynx popularized in Hong Kong.

Authors:  S E Chalstrey; N R Bleach; D Cheung; C A van Hasselt
Journal:  J Laryngol Otol       Date:  1994-10       Impact factor: 1.469

Review 3.  Practical Aspects of Otolaryngologic Clinical Services During the 2019 Novel Coronavirus Epidemic: An Experience in Hong Kong.

Authors:  Jason Y K Chan; Eddy W Y Wong; Wayne Lam
Journal:  JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2020-06-01       Impact factor: 6.223

Review 4.  Safety Recommendations for Evaluation and Surgery of the Head and Neck During the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Authors:  Babak Givi; Bradley A Schiff; Steven B Chinn; Daniel Clayburgh; N Gopalakrishna Iyer; Scharukh Jalisi; Michael G Moore; Cherie-Ann Nathan; Lisa A Orloff; James P O'Neill; Noah Parker; Chad Zender; Luc G T Morris; Louise Davies
Journal:  JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2020-06-01       Impact factor: 6.223

5.  Expert Recommendations for Tracheal Intubation in Critically ill Patients with Noval Coronavirus Disease 2019.

Authors:  Ming-Zhang Zuo; Yu-Guang Huang; Wu-Hua Ma; Zhang-Gang Xue; Jia-Qiang Zhang; Ya-Hong Gong; Lu Che
Journal:  Chin Med Sci J       Date:  2020-02-27

Review 6.  Aerosol generating procedures and risk of transmission of acute respiratory infections to healthcare workers: a systematic review.

Authors:  Khai Tran; Karen Cimon; Melissa Severn; Carmem L Pessoa-Silva; John Conly
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-04-26       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Letter: Precautions for Endoscopic Transnasal Skull Base Surgery During the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Authors:  Zara M Patel; Juan Fernandez-Miranda; Peter H Hwang; Jayakar V Nayak; Robert Dodd; Hamed Sajjadi; Robert K Jackler
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2020-07-01       Impact factor: 4.654

Review 8.  Managing head and neck cancer patients with tracheostomy or laryngectomy during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Authors:  Maxwell P Kligerman; Neelaysh Vukkadala; Raymond K Y Tsang; John B Sunwoo; F Christopher Holsinger; Jason Y K Chan; Edward J Damrose; Ann Kearney; Heather M Starmer
Journal:  Head Neck       Date:  2020-04-23       Impact factor: 3.147

9.  Approaching Otolaryngology Patients During the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Authors:  Chong Cui; Qi Yao; Di Zhang; Yu Zhao; Kun Zhang; Eric Nisenbaum; Pengyu Cao; Keqing Zhao; Xiaolong Huang; Dewen Leng; Chunhan Liu; Ning Li; Yan Luo; Bing Chen; Roy Casiano; Donald Weed; Zoukaa Sargi; Fred Telischi; Hongzhou Lu; James C Denneny; Yilai Shu; Xuezhong Liu
Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2020-05-12       Impact factor: 3.497

10.  Effectiveness of precautions against droplets and contact in prevention of nosocomial transmission of severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS).

Authors:  W H Seto; D Tsang; R W H Yung; T Y Ching; T K Ng; M Ho; L M Ho; J S M Peiris
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2003-05-03       Impact factor: 79.321

View more
  16 in total

1.  Follow-up of a national web-based survey on the SARS-CoV-2 infectious state of otorhinolaryngologists in Germany.

Authors:  Michael Herzog; Achim G Beule; Jan-Christoffer Lüers; Orlando Guntinas-Lichius; Leigh J Sowerby; Vasyl Bogdanov; Daniel Grafmans
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2021-06-04       Impact factor: 1.284

2.  Clinical and surgical management of patients with head and neck cancer in a COVID-19 dedicated center in Italy.

Authors:  Jacopo Galli; Stefano Settimi; Laura Tricarico; Giovanni Almadori; Gaetano Paludetti
Journal:  Head Neck       Date:  2020-06-01       Impact factor: 3.147

3.  Recommendations from the Canadian Association of Head and Neck Surgical Oncology for the Management of Head and Neck Cancers during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Authors:  Daniel A O'Connell; Hadi Seikaly; Andre Isaac; Justin Pyne; Robert D Hart; David Goldstein; John Yoo
Journal:  J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2020-07-29

4.  A Consensus Statement for the Management and Rehabilitation of Communication and Swallowing Function in the ICU: A Global Response to COVID-19.

Authors:  Amy Freeman-Sanderson; Elizabeth C Ward; Anna Miles; Irene de Pedro Netto; Sallyanne Duncan; Yoko Inamoto; Jackie McRae; Natasha Pillay; Stacey A Skoretz; Margaret Walshe; Martin B Brodsky
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2020-11-07       Impact factor: 3.966

Review 5.  SARS-CoV-2 Infection in Cancer Patients: Effects on Disease Outcomes and Patient Prognosis.

Authors:  Gaurav Seth; Saira Sethi; Shristi Bhattarai; Geetanjali Saini; Chandra Bhushan Singh; Ritu Aneja
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2020-11-05       Impact factor: 6.639

Review 6.  Voice Therapy in the Context of the COVID-19 Pandemic: Guidelines for Clinical Practice.

Authors:  Adrián Castillo-Allendes; Francisco Contreras-Ruston; Lady Catherine Cantor-Cutiva; Juliana Codino; Marco Guzman; Celina Malebran; Carlos Manzano; Axel Pavez; Thays Vaiano; Fabiana Wilder; Mara Behlau
Journal:  J Voice       Date:  2020-08-07       Impact factor: 2.009

7.  Results of a national web-based survey on the SARS-CoV-2 infectious state of otorhinolaryngologists in Germany.

Authors:  Michael Herzog; Achim G Beule; Jan-Christoffer Lüers; Orlando Guntinas-Lichius; Leigh J Sowerby; Daniel Grafmans
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2020-09-08       Impact factor: 2.503

Review 8.  Considerations for head and neck oncology practices during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic: Wuhan and Toronto experience.

Authors:  Vincent Wu; Christopher W Noel; David Forner; Zhi-Jian Zhang; Kevin M Higgins; Danny J Enepekides; John M Lee; Ian J Witterick; John J Kim; John N Waldron; Jonathan C Irish; Qing-Quan Hua; Antoine Eskander
Journal:  Head Neck       Date:  2020-04-27       Impact factor: 3.147

Review 9.  Managing head and neck cancer patients with tracheostomy or laryngectomy during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Authors:  Maxwell P Kligerman; Neelaysh Vukkadala; Raymond K Y Tsang; John B Sunwoo; F Christopher Holsinger; Jason Y K Chan; Edward J Damrose; Ann Kearney; Heather M Starmer
Journal:  Head Neck       Date:  2020-04-23       Impact factor: 3.147

10.  The New Normal of ENT OPD: Adapting Safe Practices.

Authors:  Aditya Yeolekar; Sudhir Bhalerao; Maya Bhalerao
Journal:  Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2020-09-14
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.