Literature DB >> 32297349

Skin reactions of N95 masks and medial masks among health-care personnel: A self-report questionnaire survey in China.

Ying Zuo1, Wei Hua1,2, Yaxin Luo3, Li Li1,2.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Keywords:  N95 masks; acne; adverse skin reaction; health-care personnel; medical masks

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32297349      PMCID: PMC7262031          DOI: 10.1111/cod.13555

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Contact Dermatitis        ISSN: 0105-1873            Impact factor:   6.419


× No keyword cloud information.
Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID‐19) was first recognized in December 2019 and was later declared as a pandemic by the World Health Organization (WHO). Health‐care personnel (HCP) in affected areas were exposed to prolonged use of masks for prevention of infection. This study aims to characterize adverse reactions related to masks among the HCP in China.

METHODS

A cross‐sectional survey was conducted among 583 Chinese HCP in February 2020, using a self‐administered online questionnaire that was created using a crowdsourcing platform (equivalent to Amazon Mechanical Turk), which recruited 407 participants (response of 69.8%). Three participants were excluded because of improper mask types. Thus, a total of 404 participants constituted our final sample. Participants were requested to document skin, eye, and respiratory tract symptoms and suspected etiologic factors related to the use of masks (Table 1). Underlying inflammatory facial dermatoses (IFDs) and allergic disorders were queried. Ethical approval for this study was granted by the Ethics Committee of the West China Hospital, Sichuan University (2020‐225).

RESULTS

Overall, 198 (49.0%) HCP reported mask‐related skin reactions (Table 1), of whom 169 (85.4%) had facial skin problems, 69 (17.1%) reported respiratory tract problems, and 25 (6.2%) had eye symptoms. Suspected risk factors are listed in Table 2. Of all investigated HCP, 45.0% (N = 182) admitted touching the mask surface occasionally owing to discomfort, and 8.9% (N = 36) removed their masks because they could not tolerate it. Of the 129 participants with underlying IFD, 44.2% (N = 57) reported exacerbation, including 43.6% (N = 44) of acne patients, 37.5% (N = 9) with seborrheic dermatitis, and all 14 acne rosacea patients.
TABLE 2

Association between mask‐related facial skin symptoms and potential risk factors

Risk factorTotal, N (%)Skin symptoms a , N (%)OR (95%CI) crude P OR (95%CI) adjusted b P b
Sex
Male100 (24.8)33 (19.5)11
Female304 (75.2)136 (80.5) 1.6 (1.0‐2.6) .039* 1.6 (1.0‐2.6).073
Allergy
No269 (66.6)105 (62.1)11
Yes135 (33.4)64 (37.9)1.4 (0.9‐2.1).111.27 (0.8‐2.0).30
Underlying IFD
No275 (68.1)102 (60.4)11
Yes129 (31.9)67 (39.6) 1.8 (1.2‐2.8) .005* 1.7 (1.1‐2.7) .016*
Mask
Medical366 (90.6)147 (87.0)11
N9538 (9.4)22 (13.0) 2.05 (1.0‐4.0) .035* 2.63 (1.3‐5.4) .009*
Frequency/day
<1113 (28.0)38 (22.5)11
1107 (26.5)40 (23.7)1.2 (0.7‐2.1).561.1 (0.6‐2.0).69
≥2184 (45.5)91 (53.8) 1.9 (1.2‐3.1) .008* 1.7 (1.0‐2.9).061
Duration
<4 h174 (43.1)54 (32.0)11
4‐8 h146 (36.1)68 (40.2) 1.9 (1.2‐3.1) .008* 1.8 (1.1‐3.0) .020*
>8 h84 (20.8)47 (27.8) 2.8 (1.7‐4.8) <.001* 2.7 (1.5‐4.7) <.001*

Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval; IFD, inflammatory facial dermatosis; OR, odds ratio; *P <0 .05; Bold means there is statistically significant difference.

Ear and scalp adverse discomforts caused by mask straps were excluded as we focused on the side effect of the mask on the face.

Multiple logistic regression analysis was used.

Mask‐related skin symptoms reported by health‐care personnel (N = 404, multiple answers possible) Association between mask‐related facial skin symptoms and potential risk factors Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval; IFD, inflammatory facial dermatosis; OR, odds ratio; *P <0 .05; Bold means there is statistically significant difference. Ear and scalp adverse discomforts caused by mask straps were excluded as we focused on the side effect of the mask on the face. Multiple logistic regression analysis was used.

DISCUSSION

Our study describes mask‐related adverse reactions in HCP. The higher prevalence of skin symptoms among women might be related to a lower threshold for reporting adverse reactions. The most frequent symptoms were pressure related. Symptoms suggesting allergic or irritant reactions, such as itch, redness, and rashes, were also prevalent. Previously, N95 and surgical masks have been documented to contain formaldehyde and other preservatives,2, 3 which might induce contact dermatitis. Friction, warmth, and moisture from respiration may enhance symptoms. Skin barrier dysfunction and potential skin microbiota disorder of IFD might make patients more vulnerable to the mask side effects. A survey in Singapore reported acne to be the most common adverse reaction (59.6%, N = 65) to N95 masks. This is consistent with our findings of a high exacerbating rate (43.6%, N = 44) of acne. Meanwhile, it should be noted that use of masks could pose a great risk for rosacea patients because all HCP with rosacea (N = 14) reported an exacerbation. N95 masks have higher air impermeability and stronger local pressure, which may lead to more skin symptoms. Our survey revealed a high share of mask incompliance due to discomfort, which could favour transmission of pathogens. In conclusion, this survey found that mask‐related skin symptoms were common in Chinese HCP and that those with underlying IFDs should be particularly cautious, as flares were associated with prolonged mask use. N95 masks were associated with more reactions than medical masks. This indicates a need to provide affected HCP with effective dermatological treatment and establish prevention methods for occupational skin disorders at a national level.

AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS

Ying Zuo:Conceptualization; data curation; formal analysis; investigation; methodology; resources; supervision; writing‐original draft; writing‐review and editing. Wei HUA: Conceptualization; investigation; methodology; project administration; visualization; writing‐review and editing. Yaxin Luo: Data curation; formal analysis. Li Li: Funding acquisition; project administration; supervision; writing‐review and editing.

CONFLICTS OF INTEREST

The authors declare no conflicts of interests. Appendix S1. ONLINE SUPPLEMENTAL APPENDICES, Original questionnaire, please refer to the Questionnaire File Click here for additional data file. TABLE S1 Mask‐related symptoms reported by HCP (N = 404, multiple answers). HCP, health‐care personnel TABLE S2 Exacerbation of underlying inflammatory facial dermatoses(IFD). ( N=129, multiple answers) TABLE S3 Exacerbation of underlying IFDs (N = 129, multiple answers). IFDs, inflammatory facial dermatoses Click here for additional data file.
TABLE 1

Mask‐related skin symptoms reported by health‐care personnel (N = 404, multiple answers possible)

Skin symptomNumberPercentage
Discomforts caused by mask straps9022.3
Facial indentation7618.8
Itch6014.9
Redness or erythema5112.6
Rash5012.4
Dry or scaling skin4711.6
Burning153.7
Pain or prickling133.2
Swelling51.2
Numbness51.2
Greasy skin41.0
Total19849.0
  4 in total

1.  Allergic contact dermatitis from formaldehyde textile resins in surgical uniforms and nonwoven textile masks.

Authors:  Jeff Donovan; Sandy Skotnicki-Grant
Journal:  Dermatitis       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 4.845

2.  Skin reactions among Bulgarian dental students: A self-report questionnaire survey.

Authors:  Iliyana Stoeva; Maria Dencheva; Nikolai Georgiev; Atanas Chonin
Journal:  Contact Dermatitis       Date:  2019-08-05       Impact factor: 6.600

3.  Adverse skin reactions to personal protective equipment against severe acute respiratory syndrome--a descriptive study in Singapore.

Authors:  Chris C I Foo; Anthony T J Goon; Yung-Hian Leow; Chee-Leok Goh
Journal:  Contact Dermatitis       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 6.600

4.  Skin reactions of N95 masks and medial masks among health-care personnel: A self-report questionnaire survey in China.

Authors:  Ying Zuo; Wei Hua; Yaxin Luo; Li Li
Journal:  Contact Dermatitis       Date:  2020-06-01       Impact factor: 6.419

  4 in total
  43 in total

1.  PPE-associated dermatoses: effect on work and wellbeing.

Authors:  Aarthy K Uthayakumar; Evangelia Panagou; Seshi Manam; Anna Schauer; Ophelia Veraitch; Steve Walker; Emma Edmonds; Jennifer Crawley; Claire Martyn-Simmons
Journal:  Future Healthc J       Date:  2021-03

Review 2.  Adverse Effects of COVID-19 and Face Masks: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Akshitha Thatiparthi; Jeffrey Liu; Amylee Martin; Jashin J Wu
Journal:  J Clin Aesthet Dermatol       Date:  2021-09-01

3.  Skin Exposures, Hand Eczema and Facial Skin Disease in Healthcare Workers During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Cross-sectional Study.

Authors:  Nils Hamnerius; Ann Pontén; Ola Bergendorff; Magnus Bruze; Jonas Björk; Cecilia Svedman
Journal:  Acta Derm Venereol       Date:  2021-09-08       Impact factor: 3.875

Review 4.  Mask Acne in Skin of Color: A Significant Dermatological Condition Amidst the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Authors:  Sahana P Raju; Mukta Sachdev; Niti Khunger; Nina Madnani
Journal:  J Clin Aesthet Dermatol       Date:  2022-04

5.  SARS-CoV-2: skin diseases, mask wearing and unpleasant sensations.

Authors:  B Cribier; C Taieb; M Saint Aroman; J Shourick
Journal:  J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol       Date:  2021-06-03       Impact factor: 9.228

6.  Mask-induced skin changes during COVID pandemic: A cross-sectional web-based survey among physicians in a tertiary care teaching hospital.

Authors:  Gaurav Dash; Nibedita Patro; Binayak Chandra Dwari; Kumar Abhisekh
Journal:  J Cosmet Dermatol       Date:  2022-02-28       Impact factor: 2.189

7.  Face Mask-induced Itch: A Self-questionnaire Study of 2,315 Responders During the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Authors:  Jacek C Szepietowski; Łukasz Matusiak; Marta Szepietowska; Piotr K Krajewski; Rafał Białynicki-Birula
Journal:  Acta Derm Venereol       Date:  2020-05-28       Impact factor: 3.875

8.  Face Mask Usage among Young Polish People during the COVID-19 Epidemic-An Evolving Scenario.

Authors:  Radomir Reszke; Marta Szepietowska; Piotr K Krajewski; Łukasz Matusiak; Rafał Białynicki-Birula; Jacek C Szepietowski
Journal:  Healthcare (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-27

9.  Inconveniences due to the use of face masks during the COVID-19 pandemic: A survey study of 876 young people.

Authors:  Łukasz Matusiak; Marta Szepietowska; Piotr Krajewski; Rafał Białynicki-Birula; Jacek C Szepietowski
Journal:  Dermatol Ther       Date:  2020-06-26       Impact factor: 3.858

10.  Short-term skin reactions following use of N95 respirators and medical masks.

Authors:  Wei Hua; Ying Zuo; Ruoyu Wan; Lidan Xiong; Jie Tang; Lin Zou; Xiaohong Shu; Li Li
Journal:  Contact Dermatitis       Date:  2020-06-08       Impact factor: 6.419

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.