| Literature DB >> 32296538 |
Liling Gu1,2, Tao Li3, Xiongbo Song3, Xianteng Yang4, Senlei Li4, Long Chen4, Pingju Liu5, Xiaoyuan Gong3, Cheng Chen3, Li Sun4.
Abstract
Methacrylated gelatin (GelMA)/bacterial cellulose (BC) composite hydrogels have been successfully prepared by immersing BC particles in GelMA solution followed by photo-crosslinking. The morphology of GelMA/BC hydrogel was examined by scanning electron microscopy and compared with pure GelMA. The hydrogels had very well interconnected porous network structure, and the pore size decreased from 200 to 10 µm with the increase of BC content. The composite hydrogels were also characterized by swelling experiment, X-ray diffraction, thermogravimetric analysis, rheology experiment and compressive test. The composite hydrogels showed significantly improved mechanical properties compared with pure GelMA. In addition, the biocompatility of composite hydrogels were preliminarily evaluated using human articular chondrocytes. The cells encapsulated within the composite hydrogels for 7 days proliferated and maintained the chondrocytic phenotype. Thus, the GelMA/BC composite hydrogels might be useful for cartilage tissue engineering.Entities:
Keywords: bacterial cellulose; cartilage tissue engineering; hydrogel; methacrylated gelatin
Year: 2019 PMID: 32296538 PMCID: PMC7147361 DOI: 10.1093/rb/rbz050
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Regen Biomater ISSN: 2056-3426
Figure 1Characterization of methacrylated gelatin (GelMA) and bacterial cellulose (BC) particles. (A) Scheme of gelatin methacrylation. (B) 1H NMR spectra of GelMA and gelatin. (C) Size distribution of BC particles. (D) Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) of BC particles. (E) Size distribution of BC nanofibers. (F) SEM of BC particles
Figure 2Formation and morphology of the GelMA/BC composite hydrogel. (A) Scheme of GelMA/BC hydrogel formation. (B–F) Cross-sectional SEM images of hydrogels. 0BC (control), 1BC (1 mg/ml), 2BC (2 mg/ml), 4BC (4 mg/ml) and 8BC (8 mg/ml), respectively. Insets were pore size distribution of each hydrogels
Figure 3Characterization of the GelMA/BC composite hydrogels. (A) Water uptake, (B) X-ray diffraction (XRD) curves and (C) thermal gravimetric analysis of the hydrogels. Data were presented as mean ± standard deviation (n = 3, *P < 0.05)
Figure 4Frequency sweep studies indicating G′/G″ at different hydrogel concentrations
Figure 5Amplitude sweep studies depicting G′/G″ at different hydrogel concentrations and corresponding crossover values
Figure 6Mechanical properties of the GelMA/BC composite hydrogels. (A) Photographs of 0BC and 8BC hydrogels under compression. (B) Compressive stress–strain curves. (C) Compressive modulus (n = 3, *P < 0.05)
Figure 7Confocal images showing the live/dead staining of the encapsulated chondrocytes
Figure 8Immunofluorescent staining of encapsulated chondrocytes