Literature DB >> 32296143

Towards a multiscale crop modelling framework for climate change adaptation assessment.

Bin Peng1,2, Kaiyu Guan3,4,5,6, Jinyun Tang7, Elizabeth A Ainsworth8,9,10,11, Senthold Asseng12, Carl J Bernacchi13,8,9,10,11, Mark Cooper14, Evan H Delucia15,16,13,8,9,11, Joshua W Elliott17, Frank Ewert18,19, Robert F Grant20, David I Gustafson21, Graeme L Hammer14,22, Zhenong Jin23, James W Jones12, Hyungsuk Kimm15, David M Lawrence24, Yan Li25, Danica L Lombardozzi24, Amy Marshall-Colon16,13,8,9,11, Carlos D Messina26, Donald R Ort8,9,11,27, James C Schnable28,29, C Eduardo Vallejos30, Alex Wu14,22, Xinyou Yin31, Wang Zhou15.   

Abstract

Predicting the consequences of manipulating genotype (G) and agronomic management (M) on agricultural ecosystem performances under future environmental (E) conditions remains a challenge. Crop modelling has the potential to enable society to assess the efficacy of G × M technologies to mitigate and adapt crop production systems to climate change. Despite recent achievements, dedicated research to develop and improve modelling capabilities from gene to global scales is needed to provide guidance on designing G × M adaptation strategies with full consideration of their impacts on both crop productivity and ecosystem sustainability under varying climatic conditions. Opportunities to advance the multiscale crop modelling framework include representing crop genetic traits, interfacing crop models with large-scale models, improving the representation of physiological responses to climate change and management practices, closing data gaps and harnessing multisource data to improve model predictability and enable identification of emergent relationships. A fundamental challenge in multiscale prediction is the balance between process details required to assess the intervention and predictability of the system at the scales feasible to measure the impact. An advanced multiscale crop modelling framework will enable a gene-to-farm design of resilient and sustainable crop production systems under a changing climate at regional-to-global scales.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32296143     DOI: 10.1038/s41477-020-0625-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nat Plants        ISSN: 2055-0278            Impact factor:   15.793


  53 in total

1.  Prioritizing climate change adaptation needs for food security in 2030.

Authors:  David B Lobell; Marshall B Burke; Claudia Tebaldi; Michael D Mastrandrea; Walter P Falcon; Rosamond L Naylor
Journal:  Science       Date:  2008-02-01       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 2.  Crops and climate change: progress, trends, and challenges in simulating impacts and informing adaptation.

Authors:  Andrew J Challinor; Frank Ewert; Steve Arnold; Elisabeth Simelton; Evan Fraser
Journal:  J Exp Bot       Date:  2009-03-16       Impact factor: 6.992

Review 3.  Use of crop simulation modelling to aid ideotype design of future cereal cultivars.

Authors:  R P Rötter; F Tao; J G Höhn; T Palosuo
Journal:  J Exp Bot       Date:  2015-03-20       Impact factor: 6.992

4.  Quantifying impacts of enhancing photosynthesis on crop yield.

Authors:  Alex Wu; Graeme L Hammer; Al Doherty; Susanne von Caemmerer; Graham D Farquhar
Journal:  Nat Plants       Date:  2019-04-08       Impact factor: 15.793

5.  Improving process-based crop models to better capture genotype×environment×management interactions.

Authors:  Enli Wang; Hamish E Brown; Greg J Rebetzke; Zhigan Zhao; Bangyou Zheng; Scott C Chapman
Journal:  J Exp Bot       Date:  2019-04-29       Impact factor: 6.992

6.  Improving photosynthesis and crop productivity by accelerating recovery from photoprotection.

Authors:  Johannes Kromdijk; Katarzyna Głowacka; Lauriebeth Leonelli; Stéphane T Gabilly; Masakazu Iwai; Krishna K Niyogi; Stephen P Long
Journal:  Science       Date:  2016-11-18       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  Food for thought: lower-than-expected crop yield stimulation with rising CO2 concentrations.

Authors:  Stephen P Long; Elizabeth A Ainsworth; Andrew D B Leakey; Josef Nösberger; Donald R Ort
Journal:  Science       Date:  2006-06-30       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 8.  Contribution of Crop Models to Adaptation in Wheat.

Authors:  Karine Chenu; John Roy Porter; Pierre Martre; Bruno Basso; Scott Cameron Chapman; Frank Ewert; Marco Bindi; Senthold Asseng
Journal:  Trends Plant Sci       Date:  2017-04-04       Impact factor: 18.313

Review 9.  Breeding drought-tolerant maize hybrids for the US corn-belt: discovery to product.

Authors:  Mark Cooper; Carla Gho; Roger Leafgren; Tom Tang; Carlos Messina
Journal:  J Exp Bot       Date:  2014-03-04       Impact factor: 6.992

10.  Photosystem II Subunit S overexpression increases the efficiency of water use in a field-grown crop.

Authors:  Katarzyna Głowacka; Johannes Kromdijk; Katherine Kucera; Jiayang Xie; Amanda P Cavanagh; Lauriebeth Leonelli; Andrew D B Leakey; Donald R Ort; Krishna K Niyogi; Stephen P Long
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2018-03-06       Impact factor: 14.919

View more
  11 in total

1.  What processes must we understand to forecast regional-scale population dynamics?

Authors:  Jesse R Lasky; Mevin B Hooten; Peter B Adler
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2020-12-09       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 2.  Abiotic Stresses in Plants and Their Markers: A Practice View of Plant Stress Responses and Programmed Cell Death Mechanisms.

Authors:  Bruno Paes de Melo; Paola de Avelar Carpinetti; Otto Teixeira Fraga; Paolo Lucas Rodrigues-Silva; Vinícius Sartori Fioresi; Luiz Fernando de Camargos; Marcia Flores da Silva Ferreira
Journal:  Plants (Basel)       Date:  2022-04-19

Review 3.  Crop breeding for a changing climate: integrating phenomics and genomics with bioinformatics.

Authors:  Jacob I Marsh; Haifei Hu; Mitchell Gill; Jacqueline Batley; David Edwards
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2021-04-14       Impact factor: 5.699

4.  CubeSats deliver new insights into agricultural water use at daily and 3 m resolutions.

Authors:  Bruno Aragon; Matteo G Ziliani; Rasmus Houborg; Trenton E Franz; Matthew F McCabe
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-06-09       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 5.  Tackling G × E × M interactions to close on-farm yield-gaps: creating novel pathways for crop improvement by predicting contributions of genetics and management to crop productivity.

Authors:  Mark Cooper; Kai P Voss-Fels; Carlos D Messina; Tom Tang; Graeme L Hammer
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2021-03-18       Impact factor: 5.699

6.  Reproductive resilience but not root architecture underpins yield improvement under drought in maize.

Authors:  Carlos Messina; Dan McDonald; Hanna Poffenbarger; Randy Clark; Andrea Salinas; Yinan Fang; Carla Gho; Tom Tang; Geoff Graham; Graeme L Hammer; Mark Cooper
Journal:  J Exp Bot       Date:  2021-07-10       Impact factor: 6.992

Review 7.  Targeting Nitrogen Metabolism and Transport Processes to Improve Plant Nitrogen Use Efficiency.

Authors:  Samantha Vivia The; Rachel Snyder; Mechthild Tegeder
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2021-03-01       Impact factor: 5.753

Review 8.  Optimizing Crop Water Use for Drought and Climate Change Adaptation Requires a Multi-Scale Approach.

Authors:  James D Burridge; Alexandre Grondin; Vincent Vadez
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2022-04-29       Impact factor: 5.753

9.  Plants predict the mineral mines - A methodological approach to use indicator plant species for the discovery of mining sites.

Authors:  Zeeshan Ahmad; Shujaul Mulk Khan; Sue Page; Saad Alamri; Mohamed Hashem
Journal:  J Adv Res       Date:  2021-10-18       Impact factor: 12.822

10.  Founder transformants of cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) obtained through the introduction of DS-Red, Rec, Rep and CRISPR/Cas9 expressing constructs for developing base lines of recombinase mediated gene stacking.

Authors:  Sabin Aslam; Sultan Habibullah Khan; Aftab Ahmad; Sriema Lalani Walawage; Abhaya M Dandekar
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-02-03       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.