Literature DB >> 30921457

Improving process-based crop models to better capture genotype×environment×management interactions.

Enli Wang1, Hamish E Brown2, Greg J Rebetzke1, Zhigan Zhao1, Bangyou Zheng3, Scott C Chapman3,4.   

Abstract

In spite of the increasing expectation for process-based crop modelling to capture genotype (G) by environment (E) by management (M) interactions to support breeding selections, it remains a challenge to use current crop models to accurately predict phenotypes from genotypes or from candidate genes. We use wheat as a target crop and the APSIM farming systems model (Holzworth et al., 2014) as an example to analyse the current status of process-based crop models with a major focus on need to improve simulation of specific eco-physiological processes and their linkage to underlying genetic controls. For challenging production environments in Australia, we examine the potential opportunities to capture physiological traits, and to integrate genetic and molecular approaches for future model development and applications. Model improvement will require both reducing the uncertainty in simulating key physiological processes and enhancing the capture of key observable traits and underlying genetic control of key physiological responses to environment. An approach consisting of three interactive stages is outlined to (i) improve modelling of crop physiology, (ii) develop linkage from model parameter to genotypes and further to loci or alleles, and (iii) further link to gene expression pathways. This helps to facilitate the integration of modelling, phenotyping, and functional gene detection and to effectively advance modelling of G×E×M interactions. While gene-based modelling is not always needed to simulate G×E×M, including well-understood gene effects can improve the estimation of genotype effects and prediction of phenotypes. Specific examples are given for enhanced modelling of wheat in the APSIM framework.
© The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society for Experimental Biology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  APSIM; crop modelling; early vigour; gene-based modelling; genotype–phenotype prediction; trait evaluation

Year:  2019        PMID: 30921457     DOI: 10.1093/jxb/erz092

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Bot        ISSN: 0022-0957            Impact factor:   6.992


  7 in total

1.  Optimized cultivar deployment improves the efficiency and stability of sunflower crop production at national scale.

Authors:  Pierre Casadebaig; Arnaud Gauffreteau; Amélia Landré; Nicolas B Langlade; Emmanuelle Mestries; Julien Sarron; Ronan Trépos; Patrick Vincourt; Philippe Debaeke
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2022-03-16       Impact factor: 5.699

2.  Integration of Crop Growth Models and Genomic Prediction.

Authors:  Akio Onogi
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2022

Review 3.  Towards a multiscale crop modelling framework for climate change adaptation assessment.

Authors:  Bin Peng; Kaiyu Guan; Jinyun Tang; Elizabeth A Ainsworth; Senthold Asseng; Carl J Bernacchi; Mark Cooper; Evan H Delucia; Joshua W Elliott; Frank Ewert; Robert F Grant; David I Gustafson; Graeme L Hammer; Zhenong Jin; James W Jones; Hyungsuk Kimm; David M Lawrence; Yan Li; Danica L Lombardozzi; Amy Marshall-Colon; Carlos D Messina; Donald R Ort; James C Schnable; C Eduardo Vallejos; Alex Wu; Xinyou Yin; Wang Zhou
Journal:  Nat Plants       Date:  2020-04-15       Impact factor: 15.793

4.  New Food Crop Domestication in the Age of Gene Editing: Genetic, Agronomic and Cultural Change Remain Co-evolutionarily Entangled.

Authors:  David L Van Tassel; Omar Tesdell; Brandon Schlautman; Matthew J Rubin; Lee R DeHaan; Timothy E Crews; Aubrey Streit Krug
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2020-06-11       Impact factor: 5.753

5.  Simulating the effect of flowering time on maize individual leaf area in contrasting environmental scenarios.

Authors:  Sebastien Lacube; Loïc Manceau; Claude Welcker; Emilie J Millet; Brigitte Gouesnard; Carine Palaffre; Jean-Marcel Ribaut; Graeme Hammer; Boris Parent; François Tardieu
Journal:  J Exp Bot       Date:  2020-09-19       Impact factor: 6.992

Review 6.  Functional-Structural Plant Models Mission in Advancing Crop Science: Opportunities and Prospects.

Authors:  Soualihou Soualiou; Zhiwei Wang; Weiwei Sun; Philippe de Reffye; Brian Collins; Gaëtan Louarn; Youhong Song
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2021-12-23       Impact factor: 5.753

7.  Use of 3D modeling to refine predictions of canopy light utilization: A comparative study on canopy photosynthesis models with different dimensions.

Authors:  Shenghao Gu; Weiliang Wen; Tianjun Xu; Xianju Lu; Zetao Yu; Xinyu Guo; Chunjiang Zhao
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2022-08-18       Impact factor: 6.627

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.