Literature DB >> 32292255

Pelvic incidence in a femoroacetabular impingement population.

Cort D Lawton1, Bennet A Butler2, Ryan S Selley2, Kathryn A Barth2, Earvin S Balderama3, Tyler J Jenkins2, Ujash Sheth2, Vehniah K Tjong2, Michael A Terry2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: We aim to determine if pelvic incidence (PI) differed between a symptomatic femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) population and a control.
METHODS: We retrospectively identified a cohort of symptomatic FAI patients and compared measured PI to a control group.
RESULTS: The PI was significantly lower in the FAI group compared to the control (51.32±1.07 vs. 55.63±1.04; P < 0.01).
CONCLUSION: The mean PI was significantly decreased in the FAI population compared to a control.
© 2020 Professor P K Surendran Memorial Education Foundation. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  False profile; Femoroacetabular impingement; Pelvic incidence; Spinopelvic parameters

Year:  2020        PMID: 32292255      PMCID: PMC7150430          DOI: 10.1016/j.jor.2020.03.056

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Orthop        ISSN: 0972-978X


  28 in total

Review 1.  The concept of femoroacetabular impingement: current status and future perspectives.

Authors:  Michael Leunig; Paul E Beaulé; Reinhold Ganz
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-12-10       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Use of the False-Profile Radiographic View to Measure Pelvic Incidence.

Authors:  Ryan T Li; Raymond W Liu; Mithun Neral; Heath Gould; Emily Hu; Shane Nho; Michael J Salata
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 6.202

3.  Functional acetabular orientation varies between supine and standing radiographs: implications for treatment of femoroacetabular impingement.

Authors:  James R Ross; Eric P Tannenbaum; Jeffrey J Nepple; Bryan T Kelly; Christopher M Larson; Asheesh Bedi
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 4.  Femoroacetabular impingement.

Authors:  Asheesh Bedi; Bryan T Kelly
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2013-01-02       Impact factor: 5.284

5.  Prevalence of radiographic findings thought to be associated with femoroacetabular impingement in a population-based cohort of 2081 healthy young adults.

Authors:  Lene B Laborie; Trude G Lehmann; Ingvild Ø Engesæter; Deborah M Eastwood; Lars B Engesæter; Karen Rosendahl
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2011-05-25       Impact factor: 11.105

6.  Sagittal alignment of the spine and pelvis in the presence of L5-s1 isthmic lysis and low-grade spondylolisthesis.

Authors:  Pierre Roussouly; Sohrab Gollogly; Eric Berthonnaud; Hubert Labelle; Mark Weidenbaum
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2006-10-01       Impact factor: 3.468

7.  The impact of positive sagittal balance in adult spinal deformity.

Authors:  Steven D Glassman; Keith Bridwell; John R Dimar; William Horton; Sigurd Berven; Frank Schwab
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2005-09-15       Impact factor: 3.468

8.  Prevalence of cam-type deformity on hip magnetic resonance imaging in young males: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Stephan Reichenbach; Peter Jüni; Stefan Werlen; Eveline Nüesch; Christian W Pfirrmann; Sven Trelle; Alex Odermatt; Willy Hofstetter; Reinhold Ganz; Michael Leunig
Journal:  Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken)       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 4.794

9.  Sagittal alignment in lumbosacral fusion: relations between radiological parameters and pain.

Authors:  J Y Lazennec; S Ramaré; N Arafati; C G Laudet; M Gorin; B Roger; S Hansen; G Saillant; L Maurs; R Trabelsi
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 3.134

10.  Influence of lower limbs discrepancy and pelvic coronal rotation on pelvic incidence, pelvic tilt and sacral slope.

Authors:  Piotr Janusz; Marcin Tyrakowski; Jad Bou Monsef; Kris Siemionow
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-03-03       Impact factor: 3.134

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.