Kelsey C Priest1,2, Travis I Lovejoy3,4,5, Honora Englander6, Sarah Shull5, Dennis McCarty3. 1. School of Medicine, MD/PhD Program, Oregon Health & Science University, 3181 SW Sam Jackson Park Rd, Mail Code: L357, Portland, OR, 97239, USA. priest@ohsu.edu. 2. School of Public Health, Oregon Health & Science University-Portland State University, Portland, OR, USA. priest@ohsu.edu. 3. School of Public Health, Oregon Health & Science University-Portland State University, Portland, OR, USA. 4. Department of Psychiatry, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA. 5. Center to Improve Veteran Involvement in Care, VA Portland Health Care System, Portland, OR, USA. 6. Division of Hospital Medicine & Section of Addiction Medicine, Department of Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Hospitalization of patients with opioid use disorder (OUD) is increasing, yet little is known about opioid agonist therapy (OAT: methadone and buprenorphine) administration during admission. OBJECTIVE: Describe and examine patient- and hospital-level characteristics associated with OAT receipt during hospitalization in the Veterans Health Administration (VHA). PARTICIPANTS: A total of 12,407 unique patients, ≥ 18 years old, with an OUD-related ICD-10 diagnosis within 12 months prior to or during index hospitalization in fiscal year 2017 from 109 VHA hospitals in the continental U.S. MAIN MEASURE: OAT received during hospitalization. KEY RESULTS: Few admissions received OAT (n = 1914; 15%) and when provided it was most often for withdrawal management (n = 834; 7%). Among patients not on OAT prior to admission who survived hospitalization (n = 10,969), 2.0% (n = 203) were newly initiated on OAT with linkage to care after hospital discharge. Hospitals varied in the frequency of OAT delivery (range, 0 to 43% of qualified admissions). Patients with pre-admission OAT (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] = 15.30; 95% CI [13.2, 17.7]), acute OUD diagnosis (AOR = 2.3; 95% CI [1.99, 2.66]), and male gender (AOR 1.52; 95% CI [1.16, 2.01]) had increased odds of OAT receipt. Patients who received non-OAT opioids (AOR 0.53; 95% CI [0.46, 0.61]) or surgical procedures (AOR 0.75; 95% CI [0.57, 0.99]) had decreased odds of OAT receipt. Large-sized (AOR = 2.0; 95% CI [1.39, 3.00]) and medium-sized (AOR = 1.9; 95% CI [1.33, 2.70]) hospitals were more likely to provide OAT. CONCLUSIONS: In a sample of VHA inpatient medical admissions, OAT delivery was infrequent, varied across the health system, and was associated with specific patient and hospital characteristics. Policy and educational interventions should promote hospital-based OAT delivery.
BACKGROUND: Hospitalization of patients with opioid use disorder (OUD) is increasing, yet little is known about opioid agonist therapy (OAT: methadone and buprenorphine) administration during admission. OBJECTIVE: Describe and examine patient- and hospital-level characteristics associated with OAT receipt during hospitalization in the Veterans Health Administration (VHA). PARTICIPANTS: A total of 12,407 unique patients, ≥ 18 years old, with an OUD-related ICD-10 diagnosis within 12 months prior to or during index hospitalization in fiscal year 2017 from 109 VHA hospitals in the continental U.S. MAIN MEASURE: OAT received during hospitalization. KEY RESULTS: Few admissions received OAT (n = 1914; 15%) and when provided it was most often for withdrawal management (n = 834; 7%). Among patients not on OAT prior to admission who survived hospitalization (n = 10,969), 2.0% (n = 203) were newly initiated on OAT with linkage to care after hospital discharge. Hospitals varied in the frequency of OAT delivery (range, 0 to 43% of qualified admissions). Patients with pre-admission OAT (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] = 15.30; 95% CI [13.2, 17.7]), acute OUD diagnosis (AOR = 2.3; 95% CI [1.99, 2.66]), and male gender (AOR 1.52; 95% CI [1.16, 2.01]) had increased odds of OAT receipt. Patients who received non-OAT opioids (AOR 0.53; 95% CI [0.46, 0.61]) or surgical procedures (AOR 0.75; 95% CI [0.57, 0.99]) had decreased odds of OAT receipt. Large-sized (AOR = 2.0; 95% CI [1.39, 3.00]) and medium-sized (AOR = 1.9; 95% CI [1.33, 2.70]) hospitals were more likely to provide OAT. CONCLUSIONS: In a sample of VHA inpatient medical admissions, OAT delivery was infrequent, varied across the health system, and was associated with specific patient and hospital characteristics. Policy and educational interventions should promote hospital-based OAT delivery.
Authors: Jessica J Wyse; Adam J Gordon; Steven K Dobscha; Benjamin J Morasco; Elizabeth Tiffany; Karen Drexler; Friedhelm Sandbrink; Travis I Lovejoy Journal: Subst Abus Date: 2018 Impact factor: 3.716
Authors: Andrea K Finlay; Ingrid A Binswanger; Christine Timko; David Smelson; Matthew A Stimmel; Mengfei Yu; Tom Bowe; Alex H S Harris Journal: J Subst Abuse Treat Date: 2018-10-02
Authors: Honora Englander; Konrad Dobbertin; Bonnie K Lind; Christina Nicolaidis; Peter Graven; Claire Dorfman; P Todd Korthuis Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2019-12 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Matthew O'Donnell; Honora Englander; Luke Strnad; Castigliano M Bhamidipati; Evan Shalen; Patricio A Riquelme Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2022-01-11 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Caroline A King; Ryan Cook; P Todd Korthuis; Dennis McCarty; Cynthia D Morris; Honora Englander Journal: J Addict Med Date: 2022-02-08 Impact factor: 4.647
Authors: Ashish P Thakrar; David Furfaro; Sara Keller; Ryan Graddy; Megan Buresh; Leonard Feldman Journal: J Hosp Med Date: 2021-06 Impact factor: 2.899
Authors: Joshua A Barocas; Mam Jarra Gai; Brenda Amuchi; Raagini Jawa; Benjamin P Linas Journal: Drug Alcohol Depend Date: 2020-08-01 Impact factor: 4.852