Joshua A Barocas1,2, Golnaz Eftekhari Yazdi1, Alexandra Savinkina1, Shayla Nolen1, Caroline Savitzky1, Jeffrey H Samet3, Honora Englander4, Benjamin P Linas1,2. 1. Section of Infectious Diseases, Boston Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA. 2. Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts, USA. 3. Clinical Addiction Research and Education Unit, Section of General Internal Medicine, Boston Medical Center, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts, USA. 4. Division of Hospital Medicine, Oregon Health Sciences University, Portland, Oregon, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The expansion of the US opioid epidemic has led to significant increases in infections, such as infective endocarditis (IE), which is tied to injection behaviors. We aimed to estimate the population-level IE mortality rate among people who inject opioids and compare the risk of IE death against the risks of death from other causes. METHODS: We developed a microsimulation model of the natural history of injection opioid use. We defined injection behavior profiles by both injection frequency and injection techniques. We accounted for competing risks of death and populated the model with primary and published data. We modeled cohorts of 1 million individuals with different injection behavior profiles until age 60 years. We combined model-generated estimates with published data to project the total expected number of IE deaths in the United States by 2030. RESULTS: The probabilities of death from IE by age 60 years for 20-, 30-, and 40-year-old men with high-frequency use with higher infection risk techniques compared to lower risk techniques for IE were 53.8% versus 3.7%, 51.4% versus 3.1%, and 44.5% versus 2.2%, respectively. The predicted population-level attributable fraction of 10-year mortality from IE among all risk groups was 20%. We estimated that approximately 257 800 people are expected to die from IE by 2030. CONCLUSIONS: The expected burden of IE among people who inject opioids in the United States is large. Adopting a harm reduction approach, including through expansion of syringe service programs, to address injection behaviors could have a major impact on decreasing the mortality rate associated with the opioid epidemic.
BACKGROUND: The expansion of the US opioid epidemic has led to significant increases in infections, such as infective endocarditis (IE), which is tied to injection behaviors. We aimed to estimate the population-level IE mortality rate among people who inject opioids and compare the risk of IE death against the risks of death from other causes. METHODS: We developed a microsimulation model of the natural history of injection opioid use. We defined injection behavior profiles by both injection frequency and injection techniques. We accounted for competing risks of death and populated the model with primary and published data. We modeled cohorts of 1 million individuals with different injection behavior profiles until age 60 years. We combined model-generated estimates with published data to project the total expected number of IE deaths in the United States by 2030. RESULTS: The probabilities of death from IE by age 60 years for 20-, 30-, and 40-year-old men with high-frequency use with higher infection risk techniques compared to lower risk techniques for IE were 53.8% versus 3.7%, 51.4% versus 3.1%, and 44.5% versus 2.2%, respectively. The predicted population-level attributable fraction of 10-year mortality from IE among all risk groups was 20%. We estimated that approximately 257 800 people are expected to die from IE by 2030. CONCLUSIONS: The expected burden of IE among people who inject opioids in the United States is large. Adopting a harm reduction approach, including through expansion of syringe service programs, to address injection behaviors could have a major impact on decreasing the mortality rate associated with the opioid epidemic.
Authors: Sarah E Wakeman; Joshua P Metlay; Yuchiao Chang; Grace E Herman; Nancy A Rigotti Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2017-05-19 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Joshua D Lee; Edward V Nunes; Patricia Novo; Ken Bachrach; Genie L Bailey; Snehal Bhatt; Sarah Farkas; Marc Fishman; Phoebe Gauthier; Candace C Hodgkins; Jacquie King; Robert Lindblad; David Liu; Abigail G Matthews; Jeanine May; K Michelle Peavy; Stephen Ross; Dagmar Salazar; Paul Schkolnik; Dikla Shmueli-Blumberg; Don Stablein; Geetha Subramaniam; John Rotrosen Journal: Lancet Date: 2017-11-14 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Louisa Degenhardt; Amy Peacock; Samantha Colledge; Janni Leung; Jason Grebely; Peter Vickerman; Jack Stone; Evan B Cunningham; Adam Trickey; Kostyantyn Dumchev; Michael Lynskey; Paul Griffiths; Richard P Mattick; Matthew Hickman; Sarah Larney Journal: Lancet Glob Health Date: 2017-10-23 Impact factor: 26.763
Authors: Thomas D Brothers; Dan Lewer; Nicola Jones; Samantha Colledge-Frisby; Michael Farrell; Matthew Hickman; Duncan Webster; Andrew Hayward; Louisa Degenhardt Journal: PLoS Med Date: 2022-07-19 Impact factor: 11.613
Authors: Ruchi Bhandari; Talia Alexander; Frank H Annie; Umar Kaleem; Affan Irfan; Sudarshan Balla; R Constance Wiener; Chris Cook; Aravinda Nanjundappa; Mark Bates; Ellen Thompson; Gordon S Smith; Judith Feinberg; Melanie A Fisher Journal: PLoS One Date: 2022-07-15 Impact factor: 3.752
Authors: Eric A Meyerowitz; Sarimer Sanchez; Michael K Mansour; Virginia A Triant; Marcia B Goldberg Journal: Open Forum Infect Dis Date: 2020-11-13 Impact factor: 3.835
Authors: Ashley G Ceniceros; Nupur Shridhar; Melissa Fazzari; Uriel Felsen; Aaron D Fox Journal: Open Forum Infect Dis Date: 2021-02-18 Impact factor: 3.835
Authors: Joshua A Barocas; Alexandra Savinkina; Joella Adams; Raagini Jawa; Zoe M Weinstein; Jeffrey H Samet; Benjamin P Linas Journal: Lancet Public Health Date: 2021-11-30