| Literature DB >> 32291385 |
Michele Filosi1, Tony Kam-Thong2, Laurent Essioux2, Pierandrea Muglia3, Elisabetta Trabetti4, Will Spooren2, Bertram Müller-Myshok5, Enrico Domenici6,7.
Abstract
Notwithstanding several research efforts in the past years, robust and replicable molecular signatures for autism spectrum disorders from peripheral blood remain elusive. The available literature on blood transcriptome in ASD suggests that through accurate experimental design it is possible to extract important information on the disease pathophysiology at the peripheral level. Here we exploit the availability of a resource for molecular biomarkers in ASD, the Italian Autism Network (ITAN) collection, for the investigation of transcriptomic signatures in ASD based on a discordant sibling pair design. Whole blood samples from 75 discordant sibling pairs selected from the ITAN network where submitted to RNASeq analysis and data analyzed by complementary approaches. Overall, differences in gene expression between affected and unaffected siblings were small. In order to assess the contribution of differences in the relative proportion of blood cells between discordant siblings, we have applied two different cell deconvolution algorithms, showing that the observed molecular signatures mainly reflect changes in peripheral blood immune cell composition, in particular NK cells. The results obtained by the cell deconvolution approach are supported by the analysis performed by WGCNA. Our report describes the largest differential gene expression profiling in peripheral blood of ASD subjects and controls conducted by RNASeq. The observed signatures are consistent with the hypothesis of immune alterations in autism and an increased risk of developing autism in subjects exposed to prenatal infections or stress. Our study also points to a potential role of NMUR1, HMGB3, and PTPRN2 in ASD.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32291385 PMCID: PMC7156413 DOI: 10.1038/s41398-020-0778-x
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Transl Psychiatry ISSN: 2158-3188 Impact factor: 6.222
Demographic information on the subset of the ITAN collection used in this study.
| Sibling pairs | Autism | PDD-NOS | ASP | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gender concordance (N of subjects) | Male | 27 | 5 | 6 | 38 |
| Female | 4 | 1 | 0 | 5 | |
| Discordant | 24 | 4 | 4 | 32 | |
| Ethnicity ( | CEU | 41 | 8 | 6 | 55 |
| Other | 14 | 2 | 4 | 20 | |
| Age | Cases | 10.02 | 10.00 | 12.7 | 10.33 |
| CTRL | 11.34 | 10.5 | 15.1 | 11.7 | |
PDD-NOS Pervasive development disorder not otherwise specified, ASP Asperger syndrome.
DGE model results ordered by FDR.
| (a) Standard model | (b) xCell enrichment | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Name | LogFC | FDR | LogFC | FDR | ||
| HMGB3 | −0.306 | 6.15e-08 | −0.250 | 2.02e-05 | ||
| NMUR1 | −0.345 | 3.30e-06 | −0.224 | 2.11e-05 | ||
| PTPRN2 | 0.294 | 6.47e-06 | 0.290 | 3.36e-05 | ||
| NKG7 | −0.355 | 8.01e-06 | −0.207 | 6.71e-04 | 9.93e−01 | |
| PIF1 | −0.413 | 105e-05 | −0.299 | 7.54e-04 | 9.93e−01 | |
| KLRD1 | −0.240 | 1.23e-05 | −0.145 | 7.39e-04 | 9.93e−01 | |
| FKBP11 | −0.210 | 1.36e-05 | −0.159 | 1.31e-03 | 9.93e−01 | |
| GLNY | −0.451 | 1.75e-05 | −0.302 | 5.76e-04 | 9.93e−01 | |
| CLIC3 | −0.415 | 2.07e-05 | −0.269 | 1.69e-03 | 9.98e−01 | |
| MANF | −0.176 | 2.69e-05 | −0.141 | 1.36e-03 | 9.93e−01 | |
(a) Results obtained by the paired design, including technical and demographic covariates (“standard model”).
(b) Results obtained by including in the standard model the cell composition score derived by cell deconvolution analysis with xCell as additional covariate. Only results for FDR < 0.05 from the standard model are shown in the table.
Fig. 1Differential gene expression analysis.
Volcano plots and QQ-plots for the standard model (a, b) and for the model with cell composition score as covariate (c, d). The inclusion of cell enrichment scores in the DGE model results with a decrease of the inflation rate as measured by the lambda (lambda = 1.23 in (b); lambda = 0.975 in (d)).
Differential composition and cell type enrichment by using two different deconvolution approaches.
| (a) CIBERSORT differential cell composition | (b) xCell differential cell composition | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cell types | logFC enrich | FDR | Cell types | logFC enrich | FDR | ||
| NK.cells.resting | −0.0215673 | 3.66e−04 | 8.05e−03 | NK cells | −0.0030001 | 7.45e−03 | 6.81e−02 |
| Neutrophils | 0.0340265 | 1.11e−02 | 1.22e−01 | Tgd cells | −0.0008546 | 9.08e−03 | 6.81e−02 |
| B.cells.naïve | 0.0084004 | 4.30e−02 | 2.68e−01 | naïve B cells | 0.0038983 | 3.69e−02 | 1.39e−01 |
| T.cells.CD8 | −0.0134798 | 5.95e−02 | 2.68e−01 | CD4+ Tem | −0.0029231 | 3.70e−02 | 1.39e−01 |
| Macrophages.M0 | 0.0006095 | 6.10e−02 | 2.68e−01 | B cells | 0.0064601 | 5.44e−02 | 1.63e−01 |
(a) On the left, using CIBERSORT with LM 22 base matrix.
(b) On the right, using xCell algorithm FDR correction with the Benjamini–Hochberg method.
Fig. 2WGCNA Module analysis.
a Module eigengene correlation with sample traits. b Expression heatmap for module 10—“brown”. At the bottom, the eigengene values for each sample. Hierarchical clustering on the top shows three groups for NK cell composition, with the right group enriched for ASD samples. c Distribution of the module eigengene for brown module 10 and red module 13. The top panel shows a shift of the distribution peak on the left for autism and Asperger, while PDD-NOS are closer to controls.