| Literature DB >> 32289023 |
Won Hyung Choi1,2, In Ah Lee3.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the anti-mycobacterial activity of Melia azedarach L. (M. azedarach) and Lobelia chinensis Lour. (L. chinensis) extracts against the growth of Mycobacterium tuberculosis (M. tuberculosis).Entities:
Keywords: Drug susceptibility; Lobelia chinensis Lour.; MGIT 960 system; Melia azedarach L.; Tuberculosis
Year: 2016 PMID: 32289023 PMCID: PMC7104029 DOI: 10.1016/j.apjtb.2016.08.007
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Asian Pac J Trop Biomed ISSN: 2221-1691
Figure 1Extraction process of M. azedarach (A) and L. chinensis (B).
The inhibitory effects of M. azedarach and L. chinensis extracts against the growth of M. tuberculosis (H37Rv and H37Ra) determined by the REMA.
| Medicinal plant | Extracts | Concentrations (μg/mL) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| H37Rv | H37Ra | ||||||
| 200 | 100 | 50 | 200 | 100 | 50 | ||
| + | + | − | + | + | − | ||
| Chloroform extract | + | + | +/− | + | + | +/− | |
| Ethyl acetate | + | + | +/− | + | + | +/− | |
| Methanol extract | + | + | +/− | + | + | +/− | |
| H2O extract | + | + | +/− | + | + | +/− | |
| + | + | +/− | + | + | +/− | ||
| Chloroform extract | + | + | − | + | + | − | |
| Ethyl acetate | + | + | +/− | + | + | +/− | |
| Methanol extract | + | + | +/− | + | + | +/− | |
| H2O extract | + | + | +/− | + | + | +/− | |
The M. tuberculosis was incubated with different concentrations (50–200 μg/mL) of the extracts at 37 °C for 5 days. The “+” and “−” sign indicates anti-M. tuberculosis activity and no activity respectively, and “+/−” sign shows 55%–65% inhibitory rates of the extracts against the growth of M. tuberculosis.
MICs of M. azedarach and L. chinensis extracts against the growth of M. tuberculosis (H37Rv and H37Ra) determined by different anti-M. tuberculosis indicator assays.
| Medicinal plants | Extracts | MIC (μg/mL) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| REMA | MGIT 960 system | ||
| 100 | > 800 | ||
| Chloroform extract | 100 | > 800 | |
| Ethyl acetate | 100 | > 800 | |
| Methanol extract | 100 | 400 | |
| H2O extract | 100 | > 800 | |
| 100 | 800 | ||
| Chloroform extract | 100 | > 800 | |
| Ethyl acetate | 100 | > 800 | |
| Methanol extract | 100 | > 800 | |
| H2O extract | 100 | > 800 | |
M. tuberculosis (H37Rv and H37Ra) were incubated with different concentrations (25–800 μg/mL) of the extracts at 37 °C, and their susceptibility was evaluated by different anti-M. tuberculosis-indicator assays. The results of the REMA and the MGIT 960 system assay were determined after 5 days and 28 days of incubation, respectively.
Figure 2The anti-M. tuberculosis activity of M. azedarach and L. chinensis extracts against the growth of M. tuberculosis H37Rv (A) and H37Ra (B).
Control: Untreated growth-M. tuberculosis; R: Rifampicin 10 μg/mL; I: Isoniazid 10 μg/mL; A: n-Hexane extract; B: CHCl3 extract; C: Ethyl acetate extract; D: Methanol extract; E: Distilled water extract. The M. tuberculosis (H37Rv and H37Ra) were incubated with different concentrations (25–800 μg/mL) of the extracts in the MGIT 960 system device at 37 °C for 4 weeks, respectively. ∗: P < 0.05 was considered to be statistically significant compared with control.