BACKGROUND:Linezolid has antimycobacterial activity in vitro and is increasingly used for patients with highly drug-resistant tuberculosis. METHODS: We enrolled 41 patients who had sputum-culture-positive extensively drug-resistant (XDR) tuberculosis and who had not had a response to any available chemotherapeutic option during the previous 6 months. Patients were randomly assigned to linezolid therapy that started immediately or after 2 months, at a dose of 600 mg per day, without a change in their background regimen. The primary end point was the time to sputum-culture conversion on solid medium, with data censored 4 months after study entry. After confirmed sputum-smear conversion or 4 months (whichever came first), patients underwent a second randomization to continued linezolid therapy at a dose of 600 mg per day or 300 mg per day for at least an additional 18 months, with careful toxicity monitoring. RESULTS: By 4 months, 15 of the 19 patients (79%) in the immediate-start group and 7 of the 20 (35%) in the delayed-start group had culture conversion (P=0.001). Most patients (34 of 39 [87%]) had a negative sputum culture within 6 months after linezolid had been added to their drug regimen. Of the 38 patients with exposure tolinezolid, 31 (82%) had clinically significant adverse events that were possibly or probably related to linezolid, including 3 patients who discontinued therapy. Patients who received 300 mg per day after the second randomization had fewer adverse events than those who continued taking 600 mg per day. Thirteen patients completed therapy and have not had a relapse. Four cases of acquired resistance to linezolid have been observed. CONCLUSIONS:Linezolid is effective at achieving culture conversion among patients with treatment-refractory XDR pulmonary tuberculosis, but patients must be monitored carefully for adverse events. (Funded by the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases and the Ministry of Health and Welfare, South Korea; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00727844.).
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND:Linezolid has antimycobacterial activity in vitro and is increasingly used for patients with highly drug-resistant tuberculosis. METHODS: We enrolled 41 patients who had sputum-culture-positive extensively drug-resistant (XDR) tuberculosis and who had not had a response to any available chemotherapeutic option during the previous 6 months. Patients were randomly assigned to linezolid therapy that started immediately or after 2 months, at a dose of 600 mg per day, without a change in their background regimen. The primary end point was the time to sputum-culture conversion on solid medium, with data censored 4 months after study entry. After confirmed sputum-smear conversion or 4 months (whichever came first), patients underwent a second randomization to continued linezolid therapy at a dose of 600 mg per day or 300 mg per day for at least an additional 18 months, with careful toxicity monitoring. RESULTS: By 4 months, 15 of the 19 patients (79%) in the immediate-start group and 7 of the 20 (35%) in the delayed-start group had culture conversion (P=0.001). Most patients (34 of 39 [87%]) had a negative sputum culture within 6 months after linezolid had been added to their drug regimen. Of the 38 patients with exposure to linezolid, 31 (82%) had clinically significant adverse events that were possibly or probably related to linezolid, including 3 patients who discontinued therapy. Patients who received 300 mg per day after the second randomization had fewer adverse events than those who continued taking 600 mg per day. Thirteen patients completed therapy and have not had a relapse. Four cases of acquired resistance to linezolid have been observed. CONCLUSIONS:Linezolid is effective at achieving culture conversion among patients with treatment-refractory XDR pulmonary tuberculosis, but patients must be monitored carefully for adverse events. (Funded by the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases and the Ministry of Health and Welfare, South Korea; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00727844.).
Authors: Friederike Traunmüller; Michael V Schintler; Stephan Spendel; Martin Popovic; Oliver Mauric; Erwin Scharnagl; Christian Joukhadar Journal: Int J Antimicrob Agents Date: 2010-04-24 Impact factor: 5.283
Authors: Antonello Di Paolo; Paolo Malacarne; Emanuele Guidotti; Romano Danesi; Mario Del Tacca Journal: Clin Pharmacokinet Date: 2010-07 Impact factor: 6.447
Authors: Giovanni Sotgiu; Lia D'Ambrosio; Rosella Centis; Ida Mura; Paolo Castiglia; Antonio Spanevello; Giovanni Battista Migliori Journal: J Thorac Dis Date: 2015-09 Impact factor: 2.895
Authors: Nicole Salazar-Austin; Alvaro A Ordonez; Alice Jenh Hsu; Jane E Benson; Mahadevappa Mahesh; Elizabeth Menachery; Jafar H Razeq; Max Salfinger; Jeffrey R Starke; Aaron M Milstone; Nicole Parrish; Eric L Nuermberger; Sanjay K Jain Journal: Lancet Infect Dis Date: 2015-11-16 Impact factor: 25.071
Authors: David F Bruhn; Michael S Scherman; Aman P Singh; Lei Yang; Jiuyu Liu; Anne J Lenaerts; Richard E Lee Journal: Bioorg Med Chem Lett Date: 2015-12-07 Impact factor: 2.823
Authors: Maria Carla Martini; Tianbi Zhang; John T Williams; Robert B Abramovitch; Pamela J Weathers; Scarlet S Shell Journal: J Ethnopharmacol Date: 2020-07-27 Impact factor: 4.360
Authors: Filipa Mota; Ravindra Jadhav; Camilo A Ruiz-Bedoya; Alvaro A Ordonez; Mariah H Klunk; Joel S Freundlich; Sanjay K Jain Journal: ACS Infect Dis Date: 2020-04-09 Impact factor: 5.084