M Lotz1, T Budden2, S J Furney3,4, A Virós2. 1. Mathematics Institute, The University of Warwick, Warwick, UK. 2. Skin Cancer and Ageing Laboratory, Cancer Research UK Manchester Institute, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK. 3. Genomic Oncology Research Group, Department of Physiology and Medical Physics, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin, Ireland. 4. Centre for Systems Medicine, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin, Ireland.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Many cancer types display sex and age disparity in incidence and outcome. The mutational load of tumours, including melanoma, varies according to sex and age. However, there are no tools to explore systematically whether clinical variables such as age and sex determine the genomic landscape of cancer. OBJECTIVES: To establish a mathematical approach using melanoma mutational data to analyse how sex and age shape the tumour genome. METHODS: We model how age-related (clock-like) somatic mutations that arise during cell division, and extrinsic (environmental ultraviolet radiation) mutations accumulate in cancer genomes. RESULTS: Melanoma is driven primarily by cell-intrinsic age-related mutations and extrinsic ultraviolet radiation-induced mutations, and we show that these mutation types differ in magnitude and chronology and by sex in the distinct molecular melanoma subtypes. Our model confirms that age and sex are determinants of cellular mutation rate, shaping the final mutation composition. We show mathematically for the first time how, similarly to noncancer tissues, melanoma genomes reflect a decline in cell division during ageing. We find that clock-like mutations strongly correlate with the acquisition of ultraviolet-induced mutations, but critically, men present a higher number and rate of cell-division-linked mutations. CONCLUSIONS: These data indicate that the contribution of environmental damage to melanoma likely extends beyond genetic damage to affect cell division. Sex and age determine the final mutational composition of melanoma.
BACKGROUND: Many cancer types display sex and age disparity in incidence and outcome. The mutational load of tumours, including melanoma, varies according to sex and age. However, there are no tools to explore systematically whether clinical variables such as age and sex determine the genomic landscape of cancer. OBJECTIVES: To establish a mathematical approach using melanoma mutational data to analyse how sex and age shape the tumour genome. METHODS: We model how age-related (clock-like) somatic mutations that arise during cell division, and extrinsic (environmental ultraviolet radiation) mutations accumulate in cancer genomes. RESULTS: Melanoma is driven primarily by cell-intrinsic age-related mutations and extrinsic ultraviolet radiation-induced mutations, and we show that these mutation types differ in magnitude and chronology and by sex in the distinct molecular melanoma subtypes. Our model confirms that age and sex are determinants of cellular mutation rate, shaping the final mutation composition. We show mathematically for the first time how, similarly to noncancer tissues, melanoma genomes reflect a decline in cell division during ageing. We find that clock-like mutations strongly correlate with the acquisition of ultraviolet-induced mutations, but critically, men present a higher number and rate of cell-division-linked mutations. CONCLUSIONS: These data indicate that the contribution of environmental damage to melanoma likely extends beyond genetic damage to affect cell division. Sex and age determine the final mutational composition of melanoma.
Authors: Dirk Schadendorf; Alexander C J van Akkooi; Carola Berking; Klaus G Griewank; Ralf Gutzmer; Axel Hauschild; Andreas Stang; Alexander Roesch; Selma Ugurel Journal: Lancet Date: 2018-09-15 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: David C Whiteman; Peter Watt; David M Purdie; Maria Celia Hughes; Nicholas K Hayward; Adèle C Green Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2003-06-04 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: Constance H Li; Stephenie D Prokopec; Ren X Sun; Fouad Yousif; Nathaniel Schmitz; Paul C Boutros Journal: Nat Commun Date: 2020-08-28 Impact factor: 14.919
Authors: Lucas D Trucco; Piyushkumar A Mundra; Kate Hogan; Pablo Garcia-Martinez; Amaya Viros; Amit K Mandal; Nicolas Macagno; Caroline Gaudy-Marqueste; Donald Allan; Franziska Baenke; Martin Cook; Clare McManus; Berta Sanchez-Laorden; Nathalie Dhomen; Richard Marais Journal: Nat Med Date: 2018-12-03 Impact factor: 53.440
Authors: Ludmil B Alexandrov; Philip H Jones; David C Wedge; Julian E Sale; Peter J Campbell; Serena Nik-Zainal; Michael R Stratton Journal: Nat Genet Date: 2015-11-09 Impact factor: 38.330
Authors: Francis Blokzijl; Joep de Ligt; Myrthe Jager; Valentina Sasselli; Sophie Roerink; Nobuo Sasaki; Meritxell Huch; Sander Boymans; Ewart Kuijk; Pjotr Prins; Isaac J Nijman; Inigo Martincorena; Michal Mokry; Caroline L Wiegerinck; Sabine Middendorp; Toshiro Sato; Gerald Schwank; Edward E S Nieuwenhuis; Monique M A Verstegen; Luc J W van der Laan; Jeroen de Jonge; Jan N M IJzermans; Robert G Vries; Marc van de Wetering; Michael R Stratton; Hans Clevers; Edwin Cuppen; Ruben van Boxtel Journal: Nature Date: 2016-10-03 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: Amaya Viros; Jane Fridlyand; Juergen Bauer; Konstantin Lasithiotakis; Claus Garbe; Daniel Pinkel; Boris C Bastian Journal: PLoS Med Date: 2008-06-03 Impact factor: 11.069
Authors: E Elizabeth Patton; Kristen L Mueller; David J Adams; Niroshana Anandasabapathy; Andrew E Aplin; Corine Bertolotto; Marcus Bosenberg; Craig J Ceol; Christin E Burd; Ping Chi; Meenhard Herlyn; Sheri L Holmen; Florian A Karreth; Charles K Kaufman; Shaheen Khan; Sebastian Kobold; Eleonora Leucci; Carmit Levy; David B Lombard; Amanda W Lund; Kerrie L Marie; Jean-Christophe Marine; Richard Marais; Martin McMahon; Carla Daniela Robles-Espinoza; Ze'ev A Ronai; Yardena Samuels; Maria S Soengas; Jessie Villanueva; Ashani T Weeraratna; Richard M White; Iwei Yeh; Jiyue Zhu; Leonard I Zon; Marc S Hurlbert; Glenn Merlino Journal: Cancer Cell Date: 2021-02-04 Impact factor: 31.743
Authors: Timothy Budden; Caroline Gaudy-Marqueste; Sarah Craig; Yuan Hu; Charles H Earnshaw; Shilpa Gurung; Amelle Ra; Victoria Akhras; Patrick Shenjere; Ruth Green; Lynne Jamieson; John Lear; Luisa Motta; Carlos Caulín; Deemesh Oudit; Simon J Furney; Amaya Virós Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2021-04-01 Impact factor: 13.801