| Literature DB >> 32282016 |
Akram Y Elgendy1, Jeffrey L Saver2, Zahid Amin3, Konstantinos Dean Boudoulas4, John D Carroll5, Islam Y Elgendy6, Iris Q Grunwald7,8, Zachary M Gertz9, Ziyad M Hijazi10, Eric M Horlick11, Scott E Kasner12, David M Kent13, Preetham Kumar14, Clifford J Kavinsky15, David S Liebeskind2, Helmi Lutsep16, Mohammad K Mojadidi9, Steven R Messé12, Jean-Louis Mas17, Heinrich P Mattle18, Bernhard Meier19, Ahmad Mahmoud20, Ahmed N Mahmoud21, Fabian Nietlispach22, Nimesh K Patel9, John F Rhodes23, Mark Reisman21, Robert J Sommer24, Horst Sievert7,8, Lars Søndergaard25, Muhammad O Zaman20, David Thaler13, Jonathan M Tobis14.
Abstract
Importance: Recent epidemiologic and therapeutic advances have transformed understanding of the role of and therapeutic approach to patent foramen ovale (PFO) in ischemic stroke. Patent foramen ovale is likely responsible for approximately 5% of all ischemic strokes and 10% of those occurring in young and middle-aged adults. Observations: Randomized clinical trials have demonstrated that, to prevent recurrent ischemic stroke in patients with PFO and an otherwise-cryptogenic index ischemic stroke, PFO closure is superior to antiplatelet medical therapy alone; these trials have provided some evidence that, among medical therapy options, anticoagulants may be more effective than antiplatelet agents. Conclusions and Relevance: These new data indicate a need to update classification schemes of causative mechanisms in stroke, developed in an era in which an association between PFO and stroke was viewed as uncertain. We propose a revised general nomenclature and classification framework for PFO-associated stroke and detailed revisions for the 3 major stroke subtyping algorithms in wide use.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32282016 DOI: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2020.0458
Source DB: PubMed Journal: JAMA Neurol ISSN: 2168-6149 Impact factor: 18.302