Literature DB >> 36221937

Establishment of the Heart and Brain Team for Patent Foramen Ovale Closure in Stroke Patients: An Expert Opinion.

Jong S Kim1, Vincent Thijs2, Matias Yudi3, Kazunori Toyoda4, Masayuki Shiozawa4, Jin Zening5, Brian Clapp6, Bert Albers7, Hans-Christoph Diener8.   

Abstract

The online 2021 Asian-Pacific Heart and Brain Summit was organized to present and discuss experiences within leading Asian-Pacific centers with regard to institutional heart and brain teams managing the diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up of cryptogenic stroke (CS) patients with patent foramen ovale (PFO). This manuscript presents a narrative review of presentations and discussions during the summit meeting. Percutaneous PFO closure is an established therapy for CS patients in whom PFO is considered to be causal. Guidelines and consensus statements emphasize the importance of multidisciplinary clinical decision-making regarding PFO closure with the involvement of several clinical specialties, including neurology, cardiology, and hematology. It is also recommended that the patient be closely involved in this process. The heart and brain team is a collaborative platform that facilitates such a multidisciplinary decision-making process and patient involvement. It also creates opportunities for education and evaluation of the healthcare provided to patients with CS. This review provides insights into the implementation, composition, organization, and operation of a heart and brain team. Methods and metrics are suggested to evaluate the team's role. We suggest that an efficient heart and brain team can implement guideline-recommended multidisciplinary clinical decision-making with regard to PFO closure in CS patients and play an important role in the management of these patients.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Clinical decision-making; Patent foramen ovale; Secondary prevention; Stroke

Year:  2022        PMID: 36221937      PMCID: PMC9561221          DOI: 10.5853/jos.2022.02103

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Stroke        ISSN: 2287-6391            Impact factor:   8.632


  28 in total

Review 1.  SCAI expert consensus statement on operator and institutional requirements for PFO closure for secondary prevention of paradoxical embolic stroke: The American Academy of Neurology affirms the value of this statement as an educational tool for neurologists.

Authors:  Eric Horlick; Clifford J Kavinsky; Zahid Amin; Konstantinos Dean Boudoulas; John D Carroll; Ziyad M Hijazi; Dana Leifer; Helmi L Lutsep; John F Rhodes; Jonathan M Tobis
Journal:  Catheter Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2019-03-21       Impact factor: 2.692

2.  Predictors for atrial fibrillation detection after cryptogenic stroke: Results from CRYSTAL AF.

Authors:  Vincent N Thijs; Johannes Brachmann; Carlos A Morillo; Rod S Passman; Tommaso Sanna; Richard A Bernstein; Hans-Christoph Diener; Vincenzo Di Lazzaro; Marilyn M Rymer; Laurence Hogge; Tyson B Rogers; Paul D Ziegler; Manish D Assar
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2015-12-18       Impact factor: 9.910

3.  Closure or medical therapy for cryptogenic stroke with patent foramen ovale.

Authors:  Anthony J Furlan; Mark Reisman; Joseph Massaro; Laura Mauri; Harold Adams; Gregory W Albers; Robert Felberg; Howard Herrmann; Saibal Kar; Michael Landzberg; Albert Raizner; Lawrence Wechsler
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2012-03-15       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  Cryptogenic Stroke and High-Risk Patent Foramen Ovale: The DEFENSE-PFO Trial.

Authors:  Pil Hyung Lee; Jae-Kwan Song; Jong S Kim; Ran Heo; Sahmin Lee; Dae-Hee Kim; Jong-Min Song; Duk-Hyun Kang; Sun U Kwon; Dong-Wha Kang; Dongwhane Lee; Hyuk Sung Kwon; Sung-Cheol Yun; Byung Joo Sun; Jae-Hyeong Park; Jae-Hwan Lee; Hye Seon Jeong; Hee-Jung Song; Jei Kim; Seung-Jung Park
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2018-03-12       Impact factor: 24.094

5.  Patent Foramen Ovale Closure or Antiplatelet Therapy for Cryptogenic Stroke.

Authors:  Lars Søndergaard; Scott E Kasner; John F Rhodes; Grethe Andersen; Helle K Iversen; Jens E Nielsen-Kudsk; Magnus Settergren; Christina Sjöstrand; Risto O Roine; David Hildick-Smith; J David Spence; Lars Thomassen
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2017-09-14       Impact factor: 91.245

6.  Percutaneous Closure of Patent Foramen Ovale in Patients With Migraine: The PREMIUM Trial.

Authors:  Jonathan M Tobis; Andrew Charles; Stephen D Silberstein; Sherman Sorensen; Brijeshwar Maini; Phillip A Horwitz; John C Gurley
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2017-12-05       Impact factor: 24.094

7.  Patent Foramen Ovale Closure: Opportunity Closed in Old Patients?

Authors:  Jong S Kim; Keun-Sik Hong
Journal:  J Stroke       Date:  2021-05-31       Impact factor: 6.967

8.  Practice advisory update summary: Patent foramen ovale and secondary stroke prevention: Report of the Guideline Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology.

Authors:  Steven R Messé; Gary S Gronseth; David M Kent; Jorge R Kizer; Shunichi Homma; Lee Rosterman; John D Carroll; Koto Ishida; Navdeep Sangha; Scott E Kasner
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2020-04-29       Impact factor: 11.800

9.  Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion: An Alternative to Triple Therapy in Stroke Patients Undergoing Carotid Angioplasty.

Authors:  Ignacio Cruz-González; Blanca Trejo-Velasco; Laura Redondo-Robles; Luis López-Mesonero; Rocío González-Ferreiro; Jean Carlos Núñez; Javier Rodríguez-Collado; Pedro L Sánchez
Journal:  J Stroke       Date:  2020-05-31       Impact factor: 6.967

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.