| Literature DB >> 36221936 |
Julio I Farjat-Pasos1, Jorge Nuche1, Jules Mesnier1, Vassili Panagides1, Stephanie Cloutier2, Christine Houde2, Josep Rodés-Cabau1,2.
Abstract
Transcatheter patent foramen ovale (PFO) closure is a safe and effective treatment for secondary prevention after a PFO-associated stroke as demonstrated in multiple large randomized clinical trials. However, these trials excluded a significant proportion of patients who could have benefited from percutaneous PFO closure due to coexisting potential confounders such as additional thromboembolic risk factors, namely thrombophilia. Since scarce and conflicting data existed on such patients, current clinical management guidelines on patients with PFO mainly recommended against PFO closure in patients with thrombophilia and failed to provide any recommendation on the type and duration of antithrombotic treatment after transcatheter PFO closure. In the past 2 years, there has been new evidence supporting transcatheter PFO closure as a clinically meaningful alternative (vs. medical treatment) in this high-risk group of patients, along with additional data supporting the important role of systematic screening for thrombophilia in PFO-associated cerebrovascular events. This review article provides an updated overview of the incidence, clinical characteristics and outcomes of PFO closure in patients with thrombophilia, also commenting on the most appropriate medical treatment after PFO closure and future perspectives in the field.Entities:
Keywords: Foramen ovale, patent; Ischemic stroke; Thrombophilia
Year: 2022 PMID: 36221936 PMCID: PMC9561223 DOI: 10.5853/jos.2022.01697
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Stroke ISSN: 2287-6391 Impact factor: 8.632