Literature DB >> 32280998

The vestibulo-masseteric reflex and the acoustic-masseteric reflex: a reliability and responsiveness study in healthy subjects.

Nicola Loi1, Andrea Manca1, Francesca Ginatempo1, Franca Deriu2.   

Abstract

The vestibulo-masseteric reflex (VMR or p11 wave), the acoustic-masseteric reflex (AMR or p1/n21 wave) and the mixed vestibulo-cochlear p11/n21 potential are responses of masseter muscles to sound that can be employed to evaluate brainstem function. This study was aimed at establishing the test-retest reliability and responsiveness of these reflex parameters according to the type of electrode configuration. Twenty-two healthy volunteers (M:F = 11:11; mean age 25.3 ± 5.2 years) participated in two testing sessions separated by one week. Zygomatic and mandibular montages were compared following unilateral and bilateral stimulations. For reliability purposes, intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), coefficient of variation of the method error (CVME) and standard error of measurement (SEM) were calculated. The minimal detectable difference (MDD) was also determined as a measure of responsiveness. Both VMR (p11 wave) and AMR could be consistently evoked from test to retest, although the frequency rate was significantly higher (all p values ≤ 0.009) with zygomatic (VMR: 97.7-100%; AMR: 86.9-97.6%) than mandibular montage (VMR: 84.7-89.8%; AMR: 65.0-67.8%), with no significant differences between unilateral and bilateral stimulations. Good-to-excellent reliability and responsiveness (high ICC, low CVME, SEM and MDD scores) were detected for corrected amplitudes and peak latencies for all reflex responses, whereas raw amplitudes were associated to poor reliability. The reliability of the zygomatic montage proved superior to the mandibular montage for all reflex responses. Given their high test-retest consistency and capability to study different features of the reflex arch, both peak latencies and corrected amplitudes should be reported and considered in the interpretation of reflex testing results.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Air-conducted stimuli; Masseter VEMP; Minimal detectable difference; Test–retest reliability; VEMP; Vestibular evoked myogenic potential

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32280998     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-020-05804-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  56 in total

1.  Surface EMG of jaw elevator muscles: effect of electrode location and inter-electrode distance.

Authors:  T Castroflorio; D Farina; A Bottin; M G Piancino; P Bracco; R Merletti
Journal:  J Oral Rehabil       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 3.837

2.  A monosynaptic pathway links the vestibular nuclei and masseter muscle motoneurons in rats.

Authors:  B Cuccurazzu; F Deriu; E Tolu; B J Yates; I Billig
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-01-10       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Abnormalities of vestibular-evoked myogenic potentials in idiopathic Parkinson's disease are associated with clinical evidence of brainstem involvement.

Authors:  Edoardo R de Natale; Francesca Ginatempo; Kai S Paulus; Giovanni M Pes; Andrea Manca; Eusebio Tolu; Virgilio Agnetti; Franca Deriu
Journal:  Neurol Sci       Date:  2015-01-08       Impact factor: 3.307

4.  Smallest real difference, a link between reproducibility and responsiveness.

Authors:  H Beckerman; M E Roebroeck; G J Lankhorst; J G Becher; P D Bezemer; A L Verbeek
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 4.147

5.  Paired neurophysiological and clinical study of the brainstem at different stages of Parkinson's Disease.

Authors:  E R de Natale; F Ginatempo; K S Paulus; A Manca; B Mercante; G M Pes; V Agnetti; E Tolu; F Deriu
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-01-12       Impact factor: 3.708

6.  Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement.

Authors:  J M Bland; D G Altman
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1986-02-08       Impact factor: 79.321

7.  Myogenic potentials generated by a click-evoked vestibulocollic reflex.

Authors:  J G Colebatch; G M Halmagyi; N F Skuse
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  1994-02       Impact factor: 10.154

8.  Intensity difference thresholds assessed with eighth nerve and auditory cortex potentials: compared values from cochlear and vascular responses.

Authors:  Y Cazals; J M Aran; J P Erre
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1983-06       Impact factor: 3.208

Review 9.  Otolithic Receptor Mechanisms for Vestibular-Evoked Myogenic Potentials: A Review.

Authors:  Ian S Curthoys; J Wally Grant; Ann M Burgess; Chris J Pastras; Daniel J Brown; Leonardo Manzari
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2018-05-25       Impact factor: 4.003

10.  Vestibular Evoked Myogenic Potentials Are Abnormal in Idiopathic REM Sleep Behavior Disorder.

Authors:  Edoardo Rosario de Natale; Francesca Ginatempo; Ilaria Laccu; Michela Figorilli; Andrea Manca; Beniamina Mercante; Monica Puligheddu; Franca Deriu
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2018-10-29       Impact factor: 4.003

View more
  1 in total

1.  The effect of EMG magnitude on the masseter vestibular evoked myogenic potential (mVEMP).

Authors:  Daniel J Romero; Gary P Jacobson; Richard A Roberts
Journal:  J Otol       Date:  2022-06-24
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.