Literature DB >> 32278440

Coronary artery bypass grafting versus percutaneous coronary intervention for myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock.

Nathaniel R Smilowitz1, Carlos L Alviar2, Stuart D Katz2, Judith S Hochman2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Myocardial infarction (MI) complicated by cardiogenic shock (CS) is associated with high mortality. Early coronary revascularization improves survival, but the optimal mode of revascularization remains uncertain. We sought to characterize practice patterns and outcomes of coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with MI complicated by CS.
METHODS: Patients hospitalized for MI with CS between 2002 and 2014 were identified from the United States National Inpatient Sample. Trends in management were evaluated over time. Propensity score matching was performed to identify cohorts with similar baseline characteristics and MI presentations who underwent PCI and CABG. The primary outcome was in-hospital all-cause mortality.
RESULTS: A total of 386,811 hospitalizations for MI with CS were identified; 67% were STEMI. Overall, 62.4% of patients underwent revascularization, with PCI in 44.9%, CABG in 14.1%, and a hybrid approach in 3.4%. Coronary revascularization for MI and CS increased over time, from 51.5% in 2002 to 67.4% in 2014 (P for trend < .001). Patients who underwent CABG were more likely to have diabetes mellitus (35.5% vs. 29.2%, P < .001) and less likely to present with STEMI (48.7% vs. 80.9%, P < .001) than those who underwent PCI. CABG (without PCI) was associated with lower mortality than PCI (without CABG) overall (18.9% vs. 29.0%, P < .001) and in a propensity-matched subgroup of 19,882 patients (19.0% vs. 27.0%, P < .001).
CONCLUSIONS: CABG was associated with lower in-hospital mortality than PCI among patients with MI complicated by CS. Due to the likelihood of residual confounding, a randomized trial of PCI versus CABG in patients with MI, CS, and multi-vessel coronary disease is warranted. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32278440      PMCID: PMC7442583          DOI: 10.1016/j.ahj.2020.01.020

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am Heart J        ISSN: 0002-8703            Impact factor:   4.749


  19 in total

1.  Quantification of incomplete revascularization and its association with five-year mortality in the synergy between percutaneous coronary intervention with taxus and cardiac surgery (SYNTAX) trial validation of the residual SYNTAX score.

Authors:  Vasim Farooq; Patrick W Serruys; Christos V Bourantas; Yaojun Zhang; Takashi Muramatsu; Ted Feldman; David R Holmes; Michael Mack; Marie Claude Morice; Elisabeth Ståhle; Antonio Colombo; Ton de Vries; Marie-angèle Morel; Keith D Dawkins; Arie-Pieter Kappetein; Friedrich W Mohr
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2013-06-13       Impact factor: 29.690

2.  PCI Strategies in Patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction and Cardiogenic Shock.

Authors:  Holger Thiele; Ibrahim Akin; Marcus Sandri; Georg Fuernau; Suzanne de Waha; Roza Meyer-Saraei; Peter Nordbeck; Tobias Geisler; Ulf Landmesser; Carsten Skurk; Andreas Fach; Harald Lapp; Jan J Piek; Marko Noc; Tomaž Goslar; Stephan B Felix; Lars S Maier; Janina Stepinska; Keith Oldroyd; Pranas Serpytis; Gilles Montalescot; Olivier Barthelemy; Kurt Huber; Stephan Windecker; Stefano Savonitto; Patrizia Torremante; Christiaan Vrints; Steffen Schneider; Steffen Desch; Uwe Zeymer
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2017-10-30       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  Complete Revascularization with Multivessel PCI for Myocardial Infarction.

Authors:  Shamir R Mehta; David A Wood; Robert F Storey; Roxana Mehran; Kevin R Bainey; Helen Nguyen; Brandi Meeks; Giuseppe Di Pasquale; Jose López-Sendón; David P Faxon; Laura Mauri; Sunil V Rao; Laurent Feldman; P Gabriel Steg; Álvaro Avezum; Tej Sheth; Natalia Pinilla-Echeverri; Raul Moreno; Gianluca Campo; Benjamin Wrigley; Sasko Kedev; Andrew Sutton; Richard Oliver; Josep Rodés-Cabau; Goran Stanković; Robert Welsh; Shahar Lavi; Warren J Cantor; Jia Wang; Juliet Nakamya; Shrikant I Bangdiwala; John A Cairns
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2019-09-01       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  Clinical Characteristics and Outcomes of Patients With Myocardial Infarction and Cardiogenic Shock Undergoing Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery: Data From The Society of Thoracic Surgeons National Database.

Authors:  Deepak Acharya; Brian C Gulack; Renzo Y Loyaga-Rendon; James E Davies; Xia He; J Matthew Brennan; Vinod H Thourani; Matthew L Williams
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2015-12-22       Impact factor: 4.330

5.  Trends in mechanical circulatory support use and hospital mortality among patients with acute myocardial infarction and non-infarction related cardiogenic shock in the United States.

Authors:  Mahek Shah; Soumya Patnaik; Brijesh Patel; Pradhum Ram; Lohit Garg; Manyoo Agarwal; Sahil Agrawal; Shilpkumar Arora; Nilay Patel; Joyce Wald; Ulrich P Jorde
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2017-11-13       Impact factor: 5.460

6.  Coronary artery bypass graft surgery provides better survival in patients with acute coronary syndrome or ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction experiencing cardiogenic shock after percutaneous coronary intervention: a propensity score analysis.

Authors:  Fu-Chun Chiu; Sheng-Nan Chang; Jou-Wei Lin; Juey-Jen Hwang; Yih-Sharng Chen
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2009-06-10       Impact factor: 5.209

7.  Epidemiology of Shock in Contemporary Cardiac Intensive Care Units.

Authors:  David D Berg; Erin A Bohula; Sean van Diepen; Jason N Katz; Carlos L Alviar; Vivian M Baird-Zars; Christopher F Barnett; Gregory W Barsness; James A Burke; Paul C Cremer; Jennifer Cruz; Lori B Daniels; Andrew P DeFilippis; Affan Haleem; Steven M Hollenberg; James M Horowitz; Norma Keller; Michael C Kontos; Patrick R Lawler; Venu Menon; Thomas S Metkus; Jason Ng; Ryan Orgel; Christopher B Overgaard; Jeong-Gun Park; Nicholas Phreaner; Robert O Roswell; Steven P Schulman; R Jeffrey Snell; Michael A Solomon; Bradley Ternus; Wayne Tymchak; Fnu Vikram; David A Morrow
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes       Date:  2019-03

8.  Intraaortic balloon support for myocardial infarction with cardiogenic shock.

Authors:  Holger Thiele; Uwe Zeymer; Franz-Josef Neumann; Miroslaw Ferenc; Hans-Georg Olbrich; Jörg Hausleiter; Gert Richardt; Marcus Hennersdorf; Klaus Empen; Georg Fuernau; Steffen Desch; Ingo Eitel; Rainer Hambrecht; Jörg Fuhrmann; Michael Böhm; Henning Ebelt; Steffen Schneider; Gerhard Schuler; Karl Werdan
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2012-08-26       Impact factor: 91.245

9.  Temporal Trends and Outcomes of Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Interventions for Cardiogenic Shock in the Setting of Acute Myocardial Infarction: A Report From the CathPCI Registry.

Authors:  Siddharth A Wayangankar; Sripal Bangalore; Lisa A McCoy; Hani Jneid; Faisal Latif; Wassef Karrowni; Konstantinos Charitakis; Dmitriy N Feldman; Habib A Dakik; Laura Mauri; Eric D Peterson; John Messenger; Mathew Roe; Debabrata Mukherjee; Andrew Klein
Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2016-01-20       Impact factor: 11.195

10.  Current spectrum of cardiogenic shock and effect of early revascularization on mortality. Results of an International Registry. SHOCK Registry Investigators.

Authors:  J S Hochman; J Boland; L A Sleeper; M Porway; J Brinker; J Col; A Jacobs; J Slater; D Miller; H Wasserman
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1995-02-01       Impact factor: 29.690

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.