Literature DB >> 19660378

Coronary artery bypass graft surgery provides better survival in patients with acute coronary syndrome or ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction experiencing cardiogenic shock after percutaneous coronary intervention: a propensity score analysis.

Fu-Chun Chiu1, Sheng-Nan Chang, Jou-Wei Lin, Juey-Jen Hwang, Yih-Sharng Chen.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to find the best treatment strategy in patients who had acute coronary syndrome and ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction sustaining cardiogenic shock.
METHODS: Patients having cardiogenic shock owing to acute coronary syndrome and ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction who required hemodynamic support with intra-aortic balloon counterpulsation were retrospectively retrieved from the clinical information system in a tertiary medical center in Taiwan. A propensity score-based matching process was applied to find equalized groups with documented involvement of more than 2 coronary vessels who received percutaneous coronary intervention only (PCI only group) and who underwent subsequent coronary artery bypass graft surgery after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI+CABG group). A logistic regression model was used to find the factors associated with 30-day mortality.
RESULTS: The propensity analysis identified 44 patients in the PCI only group (35 men, 65 +/- 2 years, and 9 women, 75 +/- 4 years) and the other 44 patients in the PCI+CABG group (31 men, 67 +/- 2 years, and 13 women, 71 +/- 2 years) who had comparable baseline characteristics. The 30-day mortality, 40.9% in the PCI only group and 20.5% in the PCI+CABG group, was positively associated with percutaneous coronary intervention only (odds ratio, 3.33; 95% confidence intervals, 1.14-10.0; P = .03), increased age (odds ratio, 1.06 for each year; 95% confidence intervals, 1.01-1.12; P = .01) and a need to use extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (odds ratio, 9.64; 95% confidence intervals, 2.19-42.4; P < .001).
CONCLUSIONS: This study has shown the survival benefit of surgical intervention in high-risk patients with acute coronary syndrome or ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction who had cardiogenic shock after percutaneous coronary intervention.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19660378     DOI: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2009.03.038

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg        ISSN: 0022-5223            Impact factor:   5.209


  4 in total

1.  Coronary artery bypass grafting versus percutaneous coronary intervention for myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock.

Authors:  Nathaniel R Smilowitz; Carlos L Alviar; Stuart D Katz; Judith S Hochman
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  2020-03-12       Impact factor: 4.749

Review 2.  Optimal revascularization for complex coronary artery disease.

Authors:  Javaid Iqbal; Patrick W Serruys; David P Taggart
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2013-09-17       Impact factor: 32.419

3.  Should Bilateral Internal Thoracic Artery Grafting Be Used in Patients After Recent Myocardial Infarction?

Authors:  Dan Loberman; Dmitry Pevni; Rephael Mohr; Yosef Paz; Nahum Nesher; Mohamad Khaled Midlij; Yanai Ben-Gal
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2017-07-21       Impact factor: 5.501

4.  Immediate surgical coronary revascularisation in patients presenting with acute myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Nawid Khaladj; Dmitry Bobylev; Sven Peterss; Sabina Guenther; Maximilian Pichlmaier; Erik Bagaev; Andreas Martens; Malakh Shrestha; Axel Haverich; Christian Hagl
Journal:  J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2013-07-03       Impact factor: 1.637

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.